I mean, it's not very complicated isn'it ? A mass killing ''stopped'' by someone after 26 death and 20 wounded (which, considering the size of the congregation and the building, presumably amount to ''an awful percentage of people inside the church)is not a very good proof of ''GOOD GUYS WITH GUNS'' stopping killing.
- - - Updated - - -
Whopping success if he was an armed guard.
However, as was pointed out earlier. firearms aren't allowed in churches my friend. That is why they are prime targets.
A great example of a country that has an EXTREMELY low gun violence rate is Switzerland. So low it doesn't even register. And guess what? Every male is required to own a gun when they reach 18.
Sure, they require each and every male upon reaching the age of 18 to join the armed forces. I think it would do our youth some good. It might teach them some discipline. It certainly did me.
I know it will never happen but one can always "wish". Sadly, most people in the world wouldn't be able to handle the military life, either physically or mentally.
Last edited by Allybeboba; 2017-11-07 at 02:38 PM.
Exactly. What the right is afraid of is actual law enforcement agencies, both local, state, and federal being given the opportunity to inject their policy prescriptions into state and national floor debate, because they experience the flood of firearms and how it affects their communities on a daily basis. Throw in some statistical inference and scientific studies on firearm violence, you have the right-wing meltdown of the century when "good guys with a gun" cannot be used to falsify firearm violence data.
I agree with you on that. We should not just think everything is fine the way things are. I once thought that. But it was later after much consideration and knowledge of the existing laws and short comings of some of them, which made me think there is for sure, more we can do.