*cough*
People are paid what employers can afford. The general rule is that small businesses is what keeps towns and rural communities alive and they cannot grow if they cannot hire.With the federal minimum wage being only $7.25 per hour
That's not gonna change under "implementable" communism, that is communism that still has some connection with the outside world. English is not a universal language, but money is.people are living in modern slavery just making enough money to barely survive
People are always gonna be poor in a fiat currency society. Higher wages on the bottom means either more money is printed for compensation, lowering the value of currency, or people are simply going to starve since there's noone to give you a job.
It's a net gain for everyone in the US if the growth of jobs can increase within 2 years. It's now up to the businesses that has got a tax cut to levels seen in Europe and Asia to create jobs. It's also up to americans to create and grow new small businesses.The republicans in the senate just voted to give an express lane that is going to make inequality far worse.
It places responsibility on americans, but it can benefit the lower income bracket by giving them more jobs and in harder to reach areas. Of course it will benefit the higher bracket too, but why would you try hard to become rich in the US when you practically get the money thrown at you overseas. Exaggeration I know, but the US Corporate Tax Rate was much higher than many other places in the world, so it does make it more appealing to become richer here.
It depends. You can live better in Southern United States even with a minimum wage job.
If you live in Northern United States and got a crap job, you kinda need to live with others to survive, or get a really good job and never lose it.
I am going to make a few assumptions here: You are either a high schooler or new college student. You also don't know anything about poverty and equality. What is considered poverty in the US isn't really poverty. Poverty is what "Income equality" caused in Venezuela. People are eating their own pets to survive. Hugo Chavez ran a campaign "which advocated an end to corruption, increased spending on social programs, and redistribution of the country’s oil wealth" - Encyclopedia Britannica biography of Hugo Chavez . Little more than a decade later and the people are STARVING TO DEATH IN THE STREETS. This is what income redistribution gets you.
What do the "poor" have in the US? I can't find the source again, but I read an article that showed that 70% of those in "Poverty" have air conditioning, 50% have personal computers, 40% have gaming systems and other leisure items. There are very very few who are actually going hungry in the US. Inequality isn't a reason to revolt, dying is.
There is no perfect system where pure income equality can exist. The best you can do is attempt to give an equality of opportunity and even then this is nearly impossible.
I did not say that. And nope, the Second Amendment is here to stay as a min during our lifetimes. More than likely many life times to come.
Listen, the way I felt during Obama's term, is not something you have any control over. Opinion is all. And like noses, we all have them. :P
I'd say Denmark is pretty good where it is, most of the poor people are drug users or people who fucked up by gambling or whatever. If you can't get a job you can get welfare and live just fine, especially if you move out of big cities. I have a education, couldnt find a job, got a janitor job and now I have my own house, and aint missing anything. We have minimum wage, that is way above what is needed "just to survive" like in the US. I don't get people who insist on living in cities then complain they cant afford anything. Suck it up, move out on the country and drive/take public transport 30m-1hr to your job. I have 1 hr each way to the city every day.