OP glyph?

[doublebarrel]

Glyph of Holy Light -- Your Holy Light grants 10% of its heal amount to up to 5 friendly targets within 10 yards (up from 5 yards) of the initial target.

i mean i know glyph's are good and all but that sounds OTT think blizz need to make all glyphs equal and improve spells.

should be able to choose between glyphs.

not sure why i post here know all u palas gna flame me but happy days

[TDWP]

its not OP becuase when was the last time u saw a paly spam Holy Light

[Beasty]

Uh, when the paladin was a good player? Anyway that Glyph is very situational.

[TDWP]

no, becuase all we do is FoL

[TDWP]

edit:

and Holy Light when needed

[Beasty]

Haha if you say so then.

[TDWP]

right......?

[Itsdarkandcoldoutside]

It is funny that alot of healers do Fol when the tank is taking small amounts of damage and HL when the tank is taking tons.. It really should be the other way around HL is more mana efficient so you can just sit back tank is taking some slow regular damge so pop it on here and there then the tank takes much faster damage spam Fol try to top the tank up faster. Had a priest healer that kept trying to keep the tank up while taking lots of damage with GH (ofc failing) and took ages till he would even try listening to me. When he finally did listen and spammed FH that fight guess what.. it was easy :P

[Chaste]

It is funny that alot of healers do Fol when the tank is taking small amounts of damage and HL when the tank is taking tons.. It really should be the other way around HL is more mana efficient so you can just sit back tank is taking some slow regular damge so pop it on here and there then the tank takes much faster damage spam Fol try to top the tank up faster. Had a priest healer that kept trying to keep the tank up while taking lots of damage with GH (ofc failing) and took ages till he would even try listening to me. When he finally did listen and spammed FH that fight guess what.. it was easy :P

Except that FoL is more efficient than HL. The exact opposite of priests. HL is more HPS, but less HPM.

[Gruitka]

This glyph will give Holy paladins a little bit of breathing room on AOE dmg I hardly see this glypgh as Overpowered. Try beating Loken in Halls of Lightning with a Holy Palladin not impossible but deffinately challenging for the Palladin.

Cheers

[psicorp]

It really should be the other way around HL is more mana efficient

fail

[cerbul]

Btw, I did Loken as a paladin and I must say that EVEN MOBS HIT HARDER then that boss. And you don't need any aoe heal at all. All you need is to move away from the boss when he starts casting that aoe blast.
I must repeat. Is not paladins not being able to heal is the other healers that TRIVIALIZED the content by being able to outheal situations where NO HEALER IN THIS GAME SHOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO HEAL, but start searching for boss strategy instead.
And let's be serious, do you really think that Loken makes aoe damage that has to be healed? Wrong! If you move correctly the fight doesn't need any special heals at all.
But well, some of you not only that don;t want to use cc anymore but want to aoe heal everything ans start making every boss tank and spank? I really don't play this game for this... And if you think that buffing all healing classes to be able to make all fights tank and spank regardless of healers, is the solution I sugest you better play another game.
I miss the days when I was struggling to get done Shadow Labyrinth, Black Moras, Magisters Terrace, and lost alot of saturday nights for it.

[Aloysius]

Lol psicorp

not even sure why you bothered to respond to that. Why anyone would say HL is more mana efficient is beyond me...

Anyhow, you guys are obviously missing out on how to play holy spec, which includes holy shock as a major contributor to your healing rotation (works fantastically well with beacon), especially with infusion of light. Also, have any of you done patchwerk, razuvious or loatheb??

FL glyph is fail.
HL glyph is nice, but not OP.

[LoLHoly]

This is full of fail.

The HL's ONLY saving grace (to not being OP) is the 5 yard range. If it was 20-40, etc it would be very OP.

As for everything else said about the lack of casting HL, its all BS. Do some reading, HL is the big hitter for end-game raiders. It also allows proper use of Beacon for groups so that you can effectively keep the MT up while topping DPS and other's health bars.

Yes, FoL is still more mana efficient. /applaud Math
It's not always very group efficient. /hug GCD and hard hitting wotlk mobs.

[Firecrest]

The extended range will be nice, but not OP. It will simply be better able to make it to the melee now as before it often would not. What with the tank being in front of the boss and the melee being behind.

[Deleted]

@ TBC i remember my friend used HL rank 7 and had lot's of crit / Haste and made it more effiecient then FoL

[Offhand]

FoL spam only cut it until around the end of t5.

[Firecrest]

FoL spam only cut it until around the end of t5.

FoL spam owned between the 3.0 patch and WotLK release.

[Offhand]

FoL spam owned between the 3.0 patch and WotLK release.

This is true.

[zarondd]

No downranking of HL hurts HL viability more then anything.