1. #1

    Slow/slow vs slow/fast....

    Why does everyone use a slow/fast combo instead of slow/slow combo for spec 32/39? I mean would a slow off hand have better damage because of BCB and necrosis?

  2. #2
    Deleted

    Re: Slow/slow vs slow/fast....

    They would also proc less often. Doh.

    Oh, and less Cinderglacier procs.

  3. #3

    Re: Slow/slow vs slow/fast....

    Cinderglacier? o but why.

  4. #4

    Re: Slow/slow vs slow/fast....

    Quote Originally Posted by Janz
    They would also proc less often. Doh.

    Oh, and less Cinderglacier procs.
    So slow is main hand is mainly for KM procs and the fast off hand for all the procs BCB/Necrosis/Razorice orCinderglacier? I see I think Im beginning to get the hang of this, even though I reach over 3.1 k dps in a 25 Sarth, which I was second on the list and the one who came in first was another death knight same spec but with a fast off hand and better gear...so would the grass cutter be a good one to start off with?

  5. #5

    Re: Slow/slow vs slow/fast....

    Quote Originally Posted by Abominatrix
    Cinderglacier? o but why.
    I find Cinderglacier to work out better unless there is a mage is in the group then I switch to Razorice...common courtesy ^.^

  6. #6

    Re: Slow/slow vs slow/fast....

    Quote Originally Posted by Nookey
    5% passive dmg increase > 20% procc, especially with that fucked up PPM
    This is true...hmmm

  7. #7

    Re: Slow/slow vs slow/fast....

    razor ice on slow MH, CG or fallen crusader on offhand.
    all hail king frost strike

  8. #8

    Re: Slow/slow vs slow/fast....

    i go dual fc dummy and raid test showed its best for me and for my dw spec, ri/cg is the off-rune for 32/39 by default fc for mainhand

    btw fc is ppm and procs from styles too so everything else on mainhand is a waste of dps

  9. #9

    Re: Slow/slow vs slow/fast....

    Veering off the question... Let's get a blunt answer here. Slow main hand and fast off hand? Yes or no?

  10. #10

    Re: Slow/slow vs slow/fast....

    Quote Originally Posted by Bohrizan
    Veering off the question... Let's get a blunt answer here. Slow main hand and fast off hand? Yes or no?
    Yes, slow/fast is the way to go.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •