1. #1

    WD vs Kinetic ripper

    I've been checking stats over and over again on the 2 weapons I've linked below, but I simply cant figure out which I should take. somebody could give me their point of view?

    http://static.mmo-champion.com/mmoc/...t_9722_221.jpg
    (Kinetic ripper 10 man leviathan)

    http://www.wowhead.com/?item=39714
    (Webbed death)

    If you live life on the edge...
    Then dont QQ when vanish fails!

  2. #2

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    WD is faster, so for me it wins over KR.

  3. #3
    High Overlord
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Slovakia
    Posts
    141

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    KR is more for a shaman than rogue... the best offhand is Bladetwister, if you don't have it, stick to WD.

    http://www.wowwiki.com/Bladetwister

  4. #4

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    Quote Originally Posted by gathriel
    KR is more for a shaman than rogue...
    Except shamans don't use fast offhands :<
    This user has been banned.

  5. #5

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    I see where you come from about the weapon speed but isn't a .1 speed loss worth the other stats you gain? I currently have both and am still deciding what I like better.

  6. #6

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    Shouldn't underestimate the 0.1 speed difference. Combat potency is making up for a lot of your damage.

  7. #7

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    I was running around with both for a while, fooling around and such..

    I noticed a small gain while using the Kinetic Ripper, so I've stuck with it. Only a small gain.. but a gain, nonetheless.

  8. #8

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    I've checked it in several spreadsheets and ingame, Webbed Death gives an higher dps output.
    http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o12/Vexn/Axe.png

    Please read the signature rules.

  9. #9

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    Quote Originally Posted by Varithorn1
    Except shamans don't use fast offhands :<
    Really?
    Last time I played mine the thing was slow/fast with WF/FT.
    That was at 70 though...So I need to get a slow OH now?

  10. #10
    Partying in Valhalla
    Annoying's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Socorro, NM, USA
    Posts
    10,657

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaemi
    I've checked it in several spreadsheets and ingame, Webbed Death gives an higher dps output.
    Key word: Spreadsheets.

    Get one, save yourself and us the time. If you're really lazy you can even go off of "general" advice such as the weapon ranking on the EJ pocket guide.

  11. #11

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    Don/t forget the Golem Shart Sticker

    http://www.wowhead.com/?item=45246

    It is very nice - I have it and WD and I use the GSS for a nice DPS boost.

  12. #12

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    Quote Originally Posted by Prandur
    Really?
    Last time I played mine the thing was slow/fast with WF/FT.
    That was at 70 though...So I need to get a slow OH now?
    I.. what? Maybe at 3.0 you mean?

    Ok no, that's off-topic. Nevermind. Anyway, Webbed Death will likely be better because of the speed, but I just use Kinetic Ripper because it's annoying to use two different weapon types at once.

  13. #13

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    Umm, last I checked, both Fists and Daggers were both under the specialization of Close Quarters Combat. So its not really 2 weapon types unless you actually just for cosmetic purposes.

  14. #14
    Partying in Valhalla
    Annoying's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Socorro, NM, USA
    Posts
    10,657

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    Quote Originally Posted by martinkaca
    Umm, last I checked, both Fists and Daggers were both under the specialization of Close Quarters Combat. So its not really 2 weapon types unless you actually just for cosmetic purposes.
    They have minor normalization differences. However, as an offhand, unless you shiv, the normalization won't matter.

    http://www.wowwiki.com/Normalization

  15. #15

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    Quote Originally Posted by Annoying
    They have minor normalization differences. However, as an offhand, unless you shiv, the normalization won't matter.

    http://www.wowwiki.com/Normalization
    that has no relevance to what he said. He was pointing out that Fists and Daggers come under the same weapon spec, so "it's annoying to use two different weapon types at once." Would not apply.

  16. #16
    Partying in Valhalla
    Annoying's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Socorro, NM, USA
    Posts
    10,657

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    I was just noting against the quote "So its not really 2 weapon types unless you actually just for cosmetic purposes."

    I was just clarifying.

  17. #17

    Re: WD vs Kinetic ripper

    Quote Originally Posted by martinkaca
    Umm, last I checked, both Fists and Daggers were both under the specialization of Close Quarters Combat. So its not really 2 weapon types unless you actually just for cosmetic purposes.
    Yes, I just meant looks and sounds. I thought the word types would make it different from saying specs. Nevermind.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •