View Poll Results: Which class should be nerfed?

Voters
60. This poll is closed
  • Warrior

    5 8.33%
  • Paladin

    13 21.67%
  • Mage

    1 1.67%
  • Warlock

    2 3.33%
  • Priest

    3 5.00%
  • Shaman

    0 0%
  • Hunter

    3 5.00%
  • Death Knight

    16 26.67%
  • Druid

    6 10.00%
  • Rogue

    11 18.33%
  1. #1
    Belium
    Guest

    It's time to be PvP logical?

    Let's make a poll, just to make PvP-troll happy?

    Which class should be nerfed now/next?
    Global answer would be, even if not said out loud ;
    "every other damn class than my own, ofc."

    Correct, I am? ???

  2. #2
    Deleted

    Re: It's time to be PvP logical?

    Pointless thread #2453275

  3. #3
    Belium
    Guest

    Re: It's time to be PvP logical?

    Pointless PvP QQ is pointless aswell.
    I mean, PvP equals balanced, ever?

  4. #4

    Re: It's time to be PvP logical?

    I can't belive yet another thread about balancing PvP, it can not be done without nerfing the classes PvE-wise as well.

    Every class have suffered nerfs for abilities that made them to powerful in PvP, this have caused them to be more or less gimped in PvE. Imo the Arena have fucked up the entire game for those that enjoy PvE, the damage from the pure dps-classes have been nerfed over and over to the point they now are equal or in some cases below others.

    I don't hope for nerfs, i hope for buffing the classes that need it and letting those that don't need it to stay at where they are now.
    Quote Originally Posted by coolcatchris
    also, we're not glass cannons anymore, we haven't been for ages. either that or everyone is a cannon, and some are plate cannons.

  5. #5

    Re: It's time to be PvP logical?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gadirm
    I can't belive yet another thread about balancing PvP, it can not be done without nerfing the classes PvE-wise as well.
    Are you fucking serious man?

    "Blast the enemy for 911-1190, no effect on other players." HOW HARD WAS THAT? I just made new spell in 15seconds without touching pvp, only pve. It works same way pvp -> pve.

  6. #6

    Re: It's time to be PvP logical?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unohdus
    Are you fucking serious man?

    "Blast the enemy for 911-1190, no effect on other players." HOW HARD WAS THAT? I just made new spell in 15seconds without touching pvp, only pve. It works same way pvp -> pve.
    I don't think blizz wants a spellbook full of pve/pvp only spells.

  7. #7
    Belium
    Guest

    Re: It's time to be PvP logical?

    Quote Originally Posted by eddym3103
    I don't think blizz wants a spellbook full of pve/pvp only spells.
    /agreed

  8. #8

    Re: It's time to be PvP logical?

    0 votes on priest O_0...

    Well, i voted on paladin because they are to easy to play (retri) and its kinda weird that protection is the healing tree


    Edit: they don't need nerfs, but make retri harder and remove all stupid pvp talents from prot


  9. #9

    Re: It's time to be PvP logical?

    Putting blind and sap and gouge on the same diminishing returns wouldnt hurt PvE dps :-P Rogues are more OP then pallys.
    When people say "pls" just because its shorter then "please", I feel totally justified to say "No" just because its shorter then "Yes".

  10. #10

    Re: It's time to be PvP logical?

    In b4 Sicarus' usual nonsense.

  11. #11

    Re: It's time to be PvP logical?

    I think most of these votes aren't coming from 2200+ rated players and can't really say much. This new prot paladin healers is so OP (10 sec hammer) , but on the other hand druids barkskin/innervate is just messed up.

  12. #12

    Re: It's time to be PvP logical?

    Feral,Retadins/Prot-healing-din,Rogues,DKs... that's my opinion.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •