Originally Posted by
Rukari
I'm seeing a lot of Sylvanas hate lately and which while its not unexpected given how alliance fanboys can be, it is wholly unjustified. So let's take a look at the basic arguments leveled against her and see how legitimate they are.
Some amount of story spoilers, so consider yourself warned.
Argument: "Sylvanas is using former agents of the Scourge - Val Kyr."
Counter: Both factions are using former agents of the Scourge - Death Knights.
Whilst that is true, Death Knights where in their past lives heroes who died fighting the Scourge, the Val'kyr are scourge and if you go by one of the dungeons are people willing to become scourge.
Argument: "Necromancy is unnatural and evil."
Counter: Necromancy is no more unnatural than any other form of magic, it's simply taboo.
Furthermore, the existence of Death Knights and Warlocks within both factions shows that 'evil' magics like Death magic and Fel magic are given a pass if the cause is considered worthy.
If the end justifies the means for Warlocks and Death Knights, then it should for Sylvanas as well, what nobler cause is there than the continuation of your species?
Different again, DKs and Worlocks summon mindless undead and daemons, Sylvanas is forcing the souls of people back into their corpses with little choice if they want the curse of undeath, Necromancy is the foulest of all magics and has never ended well for the user.
Argument: "Sylvanas is raising an undead army to do her bidding... just like Arthas"
Counter: Forsaken have free will, the Scourge don't, as such, the only similarity is that both armies are undead. If all armies of undead are synonymous does that mean all armies of living are equivalent to each other as well?
The Forsaken are 'born' under her leadership which is no different than any child being born in Stormwind being ruled over by Varian. Welcome to monarchies.
Oh, and you know what other raised dead don't have free will? Ghouls.
Raising a mindless undead army to carry out orders? Gee, that sounds familiar. Oh right, Army of the Dead, that DK spell.
Death Knights are more evil than Sylvanas and use far more questionable measures, they just have less authority and aren't in the spotlight.
Is it really different? She forces people to become Forsaken (same way Arthas did). Also this is what she does to Koltira
Upon meeting Ravensun, it is revealed that she is in reality Sylvanas Windrunner. After the Alliance is defeated, Sylvanas confronts Koltira about the truce with Thassarian, and scolds him for being weak. A portal to the Undercity is opened and Koltira is pulled through by a hooked chain, where Sylvanas will attempt to purge him of his compassion for Thassarian and make him more of a servant of the Horde - more specifically, a servant of Sylvanas and the Forsaken
Argument: "Sylvanas uses the plague despite Garrosh's orders, she's committing war crimes."
Counter: First - There are no treaties in Azeroth preventing the usage of such weapons, not to mention these weapons are no more horrific than the spells players use on a regular basis, the only difference here is scale. Disease spells are just as much biological weapons, and curses could be consider even worse. Warlocks go around stealing souls.
Second - What authority does Garrosh really have over Sylvanas? Vol'jin likewise not only defies Garrosh, but threatens to kill him and everyone sings his praises. Cairne challenged him to a duel for leadership, I don't see anyone calling him out for his gross insubordination.
Garrosh is her Warchief if she doesn't want to obey him then she can leave the Horde, a for Vol'jin he says what he says for the good of the horde, same with Cairne....all the banshee queen cares about is her self and her people. As for the treaties it doesn't matter she was ordered not to use her foul plague again and yet she does with little care for who she kills, it wouldn't surprise me if she ordered the attack on the horde and alliance at Wrathgate
Argument: "Forsaken don't have Free Will"
Counter: (Recent Lore Spoilers)
The betrayal of Putress and Godfrey, as well as her watching Koltira in disguise, all point to this as being an entirely baseless accusation.
The only evidence you ever get of Forsaken being mind controlled is when Sylvanas has you charm newly raised Forsaken in WPL, however, this happens after she gets killed by a newly raised Godfrey, thus pointing at this as a new development and safety measure.
Furthermore, Alliance apparently also charm militia men into being cannon fodder, which is arguable worse. So if that's evidence that Forsaken are mind controlled, then it's also evidence that humans are mind controlled.
I wouldn't compare what humans do to the militia men to what Sylvanas does to Koltira, as for Putress we only have her word he turned against her, all those years and she had no idea?
Argument: "Sylvanas thinks undeath is a curse, so it's evil for her to bring other people into undeath."
Counter: I hear people say "Life sucks" all the time, I suppose we should call Child Services if they ever have kids and lock them in prison?
That is your best defence? really? been forced to live again in an existence most of the Forsaken hate and you compare it to a throw away comment. What next? will you compare HiV to the common cold?
Argument: "Sylvanas is emo"
Counter: Displaying sad emotions doesn't automatically make someone emo, especially when they have every reason to be sad.
And if Sylvanas is emo then Varian is butthurt.
Oh boo-hoo, you were a gladiator, get over it, cry baby.
Varian didn't spend the rest of his life crying in a crypt nor did he spend every waking hour planning revenge no matter the cost, Varian wanted revenge...sylvanas was obsessed with it.
Argument: "Sylvanas has gone mad!"
Counter: If Sylvanas's actions can be classified as anything, it's necessary. She needs to replenish the ranks of the Forsaken or they will go extinct. They will all die out. That is a fact.
You can't justifiably call Sylvanas 'mad' or 'crazy' for choosing the survival of her people as her first priority. She's their leader, that should be her first priority above all else.
Yes some of them are raised specifically to fight...during the middle of a battle, during a war, desperate times = desperate measures.
That doesn't mean they all are raised as expendable shock troops, no more than some children being raised to be fighters means that that race only breeds as a military investment.
Undeath is a curse and they should be allowed to die out, to feel the warm embrace of death not the frozen grasp of undeath, Sylvanas has gone mad because everything she originally fought against she is becoming and now with the death of Arthas she has nothing left to focus on...it wouldnt surprise me if she does go mad at some point.
(As Suggested by Xeraluin)
Argument: "Sylvanas is forcing 'innocents' into undeath"
Counter: Crowley forces 'innocents' into worgenism, telling them they can partake in the curse and join him, or he'll leave them to fend for themselves against the Forsaken, to put it frankly, leave them to die.