Idea for flare [NERF]

[Deleted]

Fix'd XD

But seriously, if you look at the tool tip:

Detect Invisibility
2% of base mana 30 yd range
Instant cast
Allows the friendly target to detect lesser invisibility for 10 min.

And

Lesser Invisibility
Instant
Gives the Succubus Lesser Invisibility for up to 5 min. This spell can only be used out of combat.

That's all its for.

everything i ever knew was a lie...

[Dungly]

Its ok becuase I wanna cast a spell......I CAST FLARE!

[DerpderpHAMMA]

ITT:a rogue who was in a random bg and right before he stunlocked a hunter he threw out a random flare and he died.

[lookatmypet]

You must be an upset rogue that walked into our flare and got killed.

[Cyph3r]

I've noticed quite a few people saying that flare needs a buff if anything, and yet no one has pointed out the news from the front page:

Marksmanship

* Flare now has a 40 yards range, up from 30 yards.

[Voices]

if your a decent rogue (lol) you would be able to get past flare...its happend many times to my hunter on arena be using timing etc..

[Snes]

I mean getting rid of a druids or rogues stealth abilities just because a flare flew over them or they tiptoed into it briefly is ridiculous. At least let a quick rogue be able to get a cheap shot if you are too slow to react and scatter, trap, ect.

Because you shouldn't be punished for walking into a blatantly obvious lit-up patch of ground in front of you, right?
The hunter has to make a decision of where to place the flare.
The rogue should avoid the flare. If they aren't bad.

Your logic: Rogues shouldn't have to worry about utilizing their stealth, they should be able to mindlessly wander a battlefield with no consequences for what is the equivalent of standing in fire; it is the opponents who are the only ones who should have to actually think and then react to said rogue.

Bad logic.

[Rakavys]

If you are a hunter and you need to use fear to beat a rogue 1v1 then you really suck.

[sicness]

u got CoS for it

sounds like a QQ post wanting to be a decent post for me

Uh... cloak does NOT work against flare.

The issue with flare is it's slow animation in relation to when it actually works on the ground, which is instantly. I'm not sure why it's been buffed to 40 yards either as that wasn't really necessary.

[Snes]

If you are a hunter and you need to use fear to beat a rogue 1v1 then you really suck.

Anyone who has to have multiple classes rolled into one sucks.

---------- Post added 2010-09-29 at 03:38 PM ----------

Uh... cloak does NOT work against flare.

The issue with flare is it's slow animation in relation to when it actually works on the ground, which is instantly. I'm not sure why it's been buffed to 40 yards either as that wasn't really necessary.

It's probably for instances (ie: Heroic DM where stealthed pats are) as well as to make up for the loss of volley.

[Bombkirby]

No, its fine. Not like the hunter will know WHERE to throw it anyways. Its sheer dumb luck to hit a rogue with flare. You have the advantage rogues.

[Hyolith]

I've noticed quite a few people saying that flare needs a buff if anything, and yet no one has pointed out the news from the front page:

Increasing the range from 30 yards to 40 yards is not exactly a buff. Plus when in the world would I ever need to throw a flare 40 yards out in front of me, the odds of it actually hitting a stealthed target is pretty slim. Unless it was into a heated battle.

[ASO]

That'll do pig, that'll do.