Quote:
The Wall Street Journal - ‘The Walking Dead’ Recap: Season 6, Episode 7, ‘Heads Up’
http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2015/...de-7-heads-up/
"Glenn surviving is not believable. It is not believable that he was pushed off the dumpster with his head pointed away from it, and landed with his head right next to it. It is not believable that two men landed in a clutch of dozens of walkers, one was torn to shreds and the other was not harmed at all. It’s even less believable when you see how much of his body was exposed to the walkers."
"That’s all secondary, however, to the worst sin: they wrote a powerful story that culminated in a horrible tragedy. And then they backtracked on it. Glenn getting trapped, falling off the dumpster, apparently dying, was the climax of a three-episode tale that showed off absolutely fantastic storytelling. Every second was exhausting, and visceral, and while Glenn’s death was shocking and upsetting, it served that story. More than served it, it made that story. Now they’ve erased that."
"But it was a poorly executed cliffhanger, and Glenn under the dumpster will join Bobby in the shower, the cork on the Island of Lost, and the St. Elsewhere snow globe in slideshows of far-fetched TV plot twists."
Time magazine - What Tonight’s Walking Dead Means for Television
http://time.com/4123840/the-walking-dead-recap/
"Glenn escaping seemingly certain death by, basically, crawling away seemed particularly chintzy."
"Having played the “fake death” card once, the series can’t, really, again — but it’s hard not to see how, with all the attention the series garnered from one fake-out, they wouldn’t be tempted. Death-defying acts are addictive, even if they sap the audience’s trust little by little."
Rolling Stone - 'The Walking Dead' Recap: Welcome Back?
http://www.rollingstone.com/tv/recap...-back-20151122
"We've got some good news and some bad news. The good news? Glenn's alive. The bad news? See the good news."
"Right here and now, though? It's hard to understand the point of all this tomfoolery.... It surely wasn't to strengthen the storytelling, because Glenn's survival actually screws that up — on two levels. For one, it unravels the spiky "compassion kills" theme that had been clinging tightly to the season's first four episodes. More importantly, an improbable escape defuses tension, which isn't a smart choice for an action-horror show."
"Because this week's episode — “Heads Up" — puts its big twist before the opening credits, the rest of the show feels especially anticlimactic. For the third week in a row, The Walking Dead didn't really advance the plot in any significant way, at least until the end."
The NY Times - ‘The Walking Dead’ Season 6, Episode 7: It’s the Not Knowing
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/22/ar...wing.html?_r=0
"I noted a couple of weeks ago that I stopped caring one way or the other, after the show extravagantly milked the mystery in the weakest episode of the season. ... And while I’m all for narrative experimentation to elicit emotion, especially from long-running series, there’s a thin line between inventiveness and shenanigans."
"The whole Glenn thing fell on the wrong side for me, for several reasons. For one thing, it’s simply implausible that with so many zombies descending upon him, not one would give him a nibble. I’m sure fresh innards are the Cronut of the walker diet but do you mean to tell me there wasn’t a single leg-man in the crowd? Glenn’s were just laying there, uncovered by Nicholas, ready for the feasting."
"Thematically, “The Walking Dead” draws much of its emotional power from the fact that everyone is on the menu.... But if you can’t trust that the people it’s apparently killed are really dead, it undercuts its own greatest strength."
"Finally, there was the gimmickry of this particular stunt. Not just the initial misdirection and later moves like painting Glenn’s name on the death wall just so Maggie could erase it later, but themetatextual gamesmanship, like the show releasing a vague statement claiming “some version of Glenn” will eventually return and then removing Steven Yeun’s name from the credits for a few episodes."
The Daily Beast - ‘The Walking Dead’: Yes, Glenn Is Alive and We All Just Got Trolled
http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...t-trolled.html
"Cop-out. Cheap trick. Rip-off. There are lots of ways to describe what happened in the first five minutes of Sunday’s Walking Dead episode, “Heads Up,” in which Glenn, who appeared to meet his doom in this season’s third episode, “Thank You,” miraculously survived falling off a dumpster into a throng of hundreds of bloodthirsty walkers.
The unsavory conclusion, either way, remains the same: in creating false suspense and undermining the life-or-death stakes it thrives on, The Walking Dead just lost at its own game."
"It would be one thing if AMC’s zombie epic brought Glenn back through some unforeseen feat of storytelling, finding some imaginative way to defy all the doubters who declared the stunt a no-win situation. Killing Glenn would mean giving a beloved character a pointless death then stringing audiences along with false hope for weeks, they said. And letting him live against such impossible odds would mean ignoring some of the show’s fundamental rules for no reason other than pulling off a cheap stunt.
That is, unless the show’s writers introduced some creative alternative to the conundrum. No such luck. Instead of some daring escape or5 rescue effort, The Walking Dead opted for the most obvious way out of its impossible situation: it simply had Glenn crawl under the dumpster, while all those walkers inexplicably ignored him, until he was nearly out of reach."
Variety - ‘Talking Dead’ Plays Role Of ‘Walking Dead’s’ Cheerful Cheerleader
http://variety.com/2015/tv/columns/t...mc-1201646550/
“Talking Dead” exists for one simple reason.... Nobody should expect or harbor any illusions about it being “Meet the Press. … Still, the show continues to treat its viewers as if they’re as mindless as the zombies who populate the mother ship. Or worse, treat a fan base that’s obviously pretty sophisticated and diverse as if they were all teenage groupies."
"Chris Hardwick’s role as host is obviously intended to be one of unbridled enthusiasm. But after the weeks of speculation prompted by the “Is Glenn dead?” story line, there were all sorts of questions he could have asked – without being negative or accusatory – instead of just acting as a cheerleader and apologist."
"And while a bit of artistic license is understandable, one needn’t be a nitpicker to feel that even a show about zombies shouldn’t become the TV version of the boy who cried wolf.