Something I've been thinking about lately.
Where is the line between replacing a computer and upgrading it?
What needs to have been done before it qualifies for having been "replaced"?
The guts? Everything? The case? The storage?
I've been pondering upon this, when I thought to myself the other day, about upgrading to LGA2011 (or if AMDs Bulldozer match them).
It apparantly will need quad-channel RAM, so, a lot of things will need to be replaced. I'm also looking into going CrossfireX (or adding another 460 for SLi) meaning GPU will most likely be replaced as well.
Although I intend, at least for now, to keep my case, SSD, HDDs, ODD and non-modular PSU and peripherals.
To me, this is an upgrade, not a replacement.
Where would you draw the line?