So I was watching the Colbert report when they brought on Amy Farell, author of
Fat Shame, a book defending obesity and attacking the American culture for having negative views on fat people. Now I understand the psychological part -- about how it shouldn't be a huge stigma to have some paunch in the stomach, but obesity
isn't healthy. Unless everything I've ever read on the subject has been crazy propaganda, obesity increases risk for a ton of diseases/conditions, high blood pressure, diabetes, heart attacks, other conditions. And saying "Fat people will live longer during a nuclear war!" is stupid. That's like defending anorexia because "they can fit into smaller spaces".
But I'm irritated at one thing in specific that she said. When Colbert said "So you're saying it's healthy and good to be obese??" she responded with, "Well, yes, in fact, most 'fat' people are generally healthier than those underweight". Soooooooo..... what about people who are at a
healthy BMI? I mean if we are talking about a BMI of 50 vs a BMI of 10, I don't know, I haven't seen any studies, but being anorexic is awful
as is being overweight. People who defend obesity always say "It's better to be
overweight than
underweight". Well, sure, but what about being NOT fat but also NOT deathly thin? No one said you have to go from 400lbs to 90lbs. Someone with a BMI of 20 is potentially going to be FAR healthier than someone obese OR anorexic.
Just because being overweight is not necessarily as bad as being underweight,
doesn't make it good. Am I crazy? Show me the (legit) study that says being overweight is super healthy and neither risky nor potentially harmful, and I'll backpedal...
I would put this in general off-topic, but I was afraid it might get moved here, and it makes more sense being here anyways.