Page 1 of 5
1
2
3
... LastLast
  1. #1

    Acount Wide Feats of Strength

    I came up with this a few days ago so hear me out. Lets say you're one of the guys that don't want to switch your main toon because you have done so much on him(titles/feat of strength) Blizzard could implement a system so that if you gain a feat of strength on a character that will then go over to any existing characters as well as new toon's.

    Lets say you got champion of ulduar or the immortal, now when you make a new toon you wont get those right away but you have to be the appropriate level to use it (lvl 80) Same goes for scarab lord (lvl 60). When some people make new characters they want everything to be fresh and new and have zero achivement's but since most feats of strength are not obtainable anymore this system would be kinda good. As for mounts they could make that account wide as well but maybe not mounts that are still obtainable.

  2. #2
    I think they need to make it more of a priority to make most achievements account wide.

  3. #3
    Terrible idea! There is no real value to having account wide achieves, feats, or sharing special "earned" mounts (scorpion and blizz store mounts obv are a different situation).

    1. If its obtainable, go get it on your fresh toon.
    2. If its unobtainable, you should have worked harder in the first place. Provide some other reason than, "I want a cool title/mount/achieve on this toon, without the effort."

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Dystrukshun View Post
    2. If its unobtainable, you should have worked harder in the first place. Provide some other reason than, "I want a cool title/mount/achieve on this toon, without the effort."
    An argument that doesn't make sense. I play a Warrior now for Guild purposes; my Paladin has all the cool stuff I earned over the years. I don't see what's wrong with me having access to the things I earnt on any character. I was there, I did the raids/PVP/events, I put in the hours. It was just on a character that sadly I don't spend the majority of my time on.

    If anything, I'd argue the lack of ability to switch things about encourages people to never ever playing anything but that one character. Which is bad, because rolling other classes can give you a great insight into them that say merely reading a guide doesn't.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Dystrukshun View Post
    Terrible idea! There is no real value to having account wide achieves, feats, or sharing special "earned" mounts (scorpion and blizz store mounts obv are a different situation).

    1. If its obtainable, go get it on your fresh toon.
    2. If its unobtainable, you should have worked harder in the first place. Provide some other reason than, "I want a cool title/mount/achieve on this toon, without the effort."
    1. why get it on a fresh toon when i already have it on my main?
    2. I worked hard to get certain titles/mounts on my main why can't i get it on my alts?

    You say the scorpion mount is okay so why aren't other mounts/title's ok? i spent time to get it..

  6. #6
    I'm not so sure about FoS and titles so I'll stay away commenting on that, but at the very least normal achievements should be account wide.

    A small example, I have done the baradin hold boss on my alliance mage several times and have a horde death knight that are over geared for it but have a very hard time finding a group since people want me to link the achievement.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Matchu View Post
    If anything, I'd argue the lack of ability to switch things about encourages people to never ever playing anything but that one character. Which is bad, because rolling other classes can give you a great insight into them that say merely reading a guide doesn't.
    I concede that I may have worded my previous post incorrectly.

    However; Mounts, Titles, and Achievements do not prevent anyone from rolling another class.

    A Tawny Wind Rider gets you from A to B just as fast as Invincible from Heroic LK or Mimi's Head. Titles, Achievements, and Feats of Strength serve no real purpose other than vanity. Does Nef have a "must have this many Nerd Points to kill" sign around his neck? Is there a [Hero of the Zandalar Tribe] requirement to enter the new Rise of the Zandalari Heroics?

  8. #8

  9. #9
    Yes lets give achievs to toons that didn't earn them, hell if you have leveled to 85 every toon you make should automatically be 85 cuz you know you did it already, you got grand marshal on your leet ass warrior so your healer druid should have it too, the wrecking ball you got on your rogue your healer shammy should get it automatically too.

  10. #10
    Deleted
    I think its a great idea, at least in the case of normal achievments and titles.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Dystrukshun View Post
    Terrible idea! There is no real value to having account wide achieves, feats, or sharing special "earned" mounts (scorpion and blizz store mounts obv are a different situation).

    1. If its obtainable, go get it on your fresh toon.
    2. If its unobtainable, you should have worked harder in the first place. Provide some other reason than, "I want a cool title/mount/achieve on this toon, without the effort."
    I see what your saying but, I have played my rogue since the start of BC untill the end of wrath. I was such a huge acheivment nerd when they came out and I have over 10000 points on him and many unbtainable mounts on him I would Love to have on my main today which is my Paladin which I didn't even create untill the start of Cata and I stoped playing my rogue because the blizz dps Queue times + I hated how like 95% of the fights in cata are like anti melee dps. So I heal now.

  12. #12
    there should be a tab on your character sheet in game that gives all the achieves that have been gotten on your account, but nothing you didn't earn on that toon should show up on that toons achievement page.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Dystrukshun View Post
    I concede that I may have worded my previous post incorrectly.

    However; Mounts, Titles, and Achievements do not prevent anyone from rolling another class.

    A Tawny Wind Rider gets you from A to B just as fast as Invincible from Heroic LK or Mimi's Head. Titles, Achievements, and Feats of Strength serve no real purpose other than vanity. Does Nef have a "must have this many Nerd Points to kill" sign around his neck? Is there a [Hero of the Zandalar Tribe] requirement to enter the new Rise of the Zandalari Heroics?

    Dude you don't understand do you? When you have these unique titles/mounts you get attached to your character and don't want to reroll a new toon even tho you don't like your current class.

  14. #14
    Deleted
    Would be great if i could link my mains dungeon/Raid achieves somehow but FoS are in some way bonded to the character and i totally agree with that.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Dystrukshun View Post
    Terrible idea! There is no real value to having account wide achieves, feats, or sharing special "earned" mounts (scorpion and blizz store mounts obv are a different situation).

    1. If its obtainable, go get it on your fresh toon.
    2. If its unobtainable, you should have worked harder in the first place. Provide some other reason than, "I want a cool title/mount/achieve on this toon, without the effort."
    I played a dps for many years, racking up 10k achievement points. I want to switch to my priest to heal, to help the guild. I'd also like to wear my sweet titles on my new toon. Why should I not be able to wear something that I worked hard for and earned? I mean, it's just a title/mount.
    White Knights on mmo-champion.com forums: Able to troll with no repercussions!

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Senaelanna View Post
    I played a dps for many years, racking up 10k achievement points. I want to switch to my priest to heal, to help the guild. I'd also like to wear my sweet titles on my new toon. Why should I not be able to wear something that I worked hard for and earned? I mean, it's just a title/mount.
    Because you earned it on your dps, you have not earned it on your healer.
    I don't understand why people think toons who didn't earn something should have it, YOU the real life player should get credit for it, on a seperate tab to show you did it, but if the character you are on didn't earn it he shouldn't have the title, mount, FoS whatever it is.

  17. #17
    Blizz wants you to play the entire way on your alts cause time spend ingame = income for the company.


    Look @t it that way. More logic.

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Trolldruid View Post
    Dude you don't understand do you? When you have these unique titles/mounts you get attached to your character and don't want to reroll a new toon even tho you don't like your current class.
    I understand completely. Absolutely nothing you've said PREVENTS you from playing a new class, other than being able to look cool while doing so.

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Nocturnes View Post
    Blizz wants you to play the entire way on your alts cause time spend ingame = income for the company.


    Look @t it that way. More logic.
    Actually that isn't true at all. It costs them more as you keep playing. They'd much rather you pay the 15 dollars and only log in once a month.

  20. #20
    The hard part would be the difference between a FoS and something really rare.
    For example, loremaster is not FoS, while The Insane is. On your new toon, you get the insane only, WTF BLIZZ, Y U NO MAKE THINGZ PROPERLY!

    There are also many many mounts that does not award FoS, or achievements at all, that are equally hard as many others that are FoS'
    Quote Originally Posted by Emothianes View Post
    Omg dude vanilla was so awesome because I was awesome and other people weren't awesome and it made me happy to be special because it was so awesome and I was happy.
    Sé onr sverdar sitja hvass!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •