J-LO's Naughty Movies, I'm conflicted

[downnola]

Dat ass?????

[Naoto]

How can you compare free porn to a sex tape of a celebrity? what would you rather see, naked pictures of a random chick or naked pictures of one of the biggest names in the world? J-lo is famous because she has a big fat ass which isn't my cup of tea, but she still has a cute face and I'd love to see her tits, anyone remember the vid where she has some dude playing with her nipples under her top to get them harder for a music shoot? yea, show those paps.

Regarding the case, you need to look at it like this, he had the camera, she agreed to be filmed so there really isn't much, if anything, she can do since she did agree and he didn't take the video illegally, hopefully this turns out to be true and people think twice before turning into sluts, there is no need to film sex and you only open yourself up for future problems, especially when you're a celebrity.

[OtisJay]

EVERYBODY wants to see ANYBODY fuck. I hate Rosie O'Donell, but if somebody said "I got a tape of Rosie O'Donell getting fucked stupid" I'd be like "Why the fuck aren't we watching that right now?" ...

... you just made my day with your fine humor
/clappy clap

[Dave131]

...No. I have better things to do with my time than watch a Rosie O'Donell sex tape. How old are you?

To be fair, age doesn't have much to do with wanting to watch stuff you're not supposed to see.

[Sumatran]

...No. I have better things to do with my time than watch a Rosie O'Donell sex tape. How old are you?

Its called a quote sir, from a little movie called Zack and Miri make a Porno, with Seth Rogan. You really never heard of it?

[Herecius]

Wouldn't it not matter since at the time of taping she consented to him taking the video? Then as of devoice he obviously owns the tape so I don't think she can legally do anything...

She consented to the taping of the video, and the sex, but wouldn't have consented to selling the video for profit, basically.

Not that even appealing and winning the court case would stop something like this from finding a way to be released and getting leaked, but that's just how it works.

[Shockzilla]

Pretty sure it's just that the law states if you're in a video and you consented to being in that video, the owner can do what they like with it.


Once again, It's just proof that laws are stupid, and we need to use a little more common sense.

The law is fine, if you don’t want the world to see you in a porn flick don’t make one. The law is not stupid at all it’s the morons making these things.

And woman please don’t give a copy to your boy friend because he is GOING to show his friends as soon as you break up, guaranteed!

[Weightless]

Its called a quote sir, from a little movie called Zack and Miri make a Porno, with Seth Rogan. You really never heard of it?

Doesn't matter if it's a quote or not, you still used it, so I assume that you meant it. People just don't blurt out random quotes for no reason, you're using the quote to push what you mean.

[masti]

EVERYBODY wants to see ANYBODY fuck. I hate Rosie O'Donell, but if somebody said "I got a tape of Rosie O'Donell getting fucked stupid" I'd be like "Why the fuck aren't we watching that right now?"

its essentially the truth.

[h8stylist]

She'll appeal the court case and I would be shocked if she didn't win it. Videos are not simply somebody's property because they own the tape; if other people besides yourself are in it, you MUST obtain permission from those in the video to use it in a commercial venture.

It was a honeymoon video, i seriously doubt j-lo did not know it was being taped, let alone give consent. If she consented for the video to be taped, the tape is proven to be his property, then he can sell it to whomever he wants without giving anything to j-lo. only time someone has to be given royalties is because there is no outright ownership of the property.

[Sumatran]

Wouldn't it not matter since at the time of taping she consented to him taking the video? Then as of devoice he obviously owns the tape so I don't think she can legally do anything...

This. She is a willing actress in the movie. She does not have to sign a waiver of any sort, she knew the taping was going on and consented to creating it.

---------- Post added 2011-06-02 at 06:14 PM ----------

Doesn't matter if it's a quote or not, you still used it, so I assume that you meant it. People just don't blurt out random quotes for no reason, you're using the quote to push what you mean.

It was a response to the second post asking why the OP wants to see a porn with J-Lo in it.

Jesus fucking christ man get off your cross. It was a joke, a funny as shit joke and many ppl got it. Remove the sick and carry on.

[Tore]

The way I see it and have seen it for every celebrity sex tape ever released--

You agreed to record it, therefore you're an idiot. You let him keep it and hold on to it, therefore you're a bigger idiot.

[sluddyazin]

She has no case for a few reasons. 1) No right to privacy. She knew he was filming everything and gave him the OK. 2) The individual who makes the tapes is automatically considered the owner. It doesn't matter who is in it. 3) He does not need her permission to sell the tape. She gave her consent to the taping. If she didn't know about the taping he would need her to sign a consent form to sell it. However, again, she consented to the taping. That is all he needs.

She could probably sue civilly and get some money though. I'm sure in some way she is entitled to some of the profits.

[Naoto]

Put it this way, if everyone took someone to court because they appeared in a video they agreed to be part of but later regretted you'd have MILLIONS of cases and the courts would get fucked up BIG TIME, she should've thought twice before agreeing to this and if this puts a dent in her career then it's her own fault, I still don't see why you need to make a sex video but who cares, as long as I get to see it.

[Statix]

As a celebrity, don't move home videos. As a girl, never let a guy tape you having sex with him. If you do, you're asking for it.

Howmany times have their been sextapes of celebrities? You'd think they'd learn, but they keep taping their sexfests.

What's the point of taping it anyway? What do you wanna do with it? Wifey: 'No hunny, I'm not in the mood today.' Hubby: 'Oké dear, let's watch the sextape we made yesterday then.' Wifey: 'Sure.' I can't stand watching myself on videos of our family holidays or hear myself speak, imagine watching myself have sex... Do you wanna let your friends see it? You: 'He guys, I made a sextape.' Guys: 'Oooooh, let us seeeee!' But when you are in a locker room, you try to hide your little general in every possible way. Or, do you do it to hold something over someone. Girl: 'You're breaking up with me? Nah uh, I'll release this tape you mofo! Don't you dare leave me!' That it?

[Poppasan]

I honestly can't wait

[Dave131]

Put it this way, if everyone took someone to court because they appeared in a video they agreed to be part of but later regretted you'd have MILLIONS of cases and the courts would get fucked up BIG TIME, she should've thought twice before agreeing to this and if this puts a dent in her career then it's her own fault, I still don't see why you need to make a sex video but who cares, as long as I get to see it.

Yeeahhhh. I just hope its better then Kim Kardashian's tape.

[h8stylist]

Doesn't matter if it's a quote or not, you still used it, so I assume that you meant it. People just don't blurt out random quotes for no reason, you're using the quote to push what you mean.

I really hope you aren't understanding what you wrote. It would seem to me that if you actually do understand and mean what you say, you are being short-sighted, close-minded, and not understanding the impact of the post from Sumatran. Either that or you are just trolling. However, saying that, i can see by your signature that you probably just like to see yourself posting.

The quote is completely valid and as most examples used as a reference (as is the case with this quote), the example given is a exaggeration to give more impact.

[Luciferstwin]

Welcome to

www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZIzD0ZfTFg

[Deleted]

Her X is a jackass if he releases videos like that, Just proves that type of man he is. Some things are better left to the imagination.

Im not saying its either way but since you do not know full details of the events between these two people, you cant judge one of them to be a jackass.

Perhaps she has been telling people he doesnt last more than 30 seconds in the bedroom and he has decided to release the proof that he does... you simply do not know. He could have been the perfect boyfriend and had her treat him like dirt. What does stand is the fact that she participated in those tapes willingly and allowed him to keep them after they split, reliquishing any claim to ownership to them she might have had and passing on the opportunity to destroy them

If this were any normal couple it wouldnt be going to court, its only because she is a multimillionaire and can afford lawyers. I dare say its more about protecting her commercial image than her modesty, she aint got anything you wont see (or be bombarded with if you stray off the beaten path) anywhere else on the net*

*unless ofc she has both male and female genitalia, i would conceed that wouldnt be so common