Page 1 of 15
1
2
3
11
... LastLast
  1. #1
    Banned Kontinuum's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Heart of the Fortress
    Posts
    2,404

    US Air Force Unveils New B-21 Bomber

    ORLANDO, Fla. — The US Air Force secretary unveiled the first official rendering of the new Long Range Strike Bomber and revealed its official designation: the B-21.

    In a speech at the Air Force Association's Air Warfare Symposium on Feb. 26, Secretary Deborah Lee James shared an artist's concept design of the next-generation bomber, which will be built by Northrop Grumman. She also announced the plane's long-awaited designation, calling it the B-21.

    However, the Air Force still has not decided on a name for the new B-21, James said. She called on airmen to send in suggestions.

    "So we have an image, we have a designation, but what we don't yet have, we don't yet have a name," James said, "and this is where I'm challenging and I'm calling on every airman today ... to give us your best suggestions for a name for the B-21, America's newest bomber."

    http://www.defensenews.com/story/bre...lrsb/80976160/
    Last edited by Kontinuum; 2016-02-26 at 07:44 PM.

  2. #2
    Merely a Setback Reeve's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    28,800
    Aside from the engines, looks nearly the same as the B-2:



    What woudl be the advantages of this plane? Do we need a long range strike bomber in a world increasingly dominated by cruise missiles and drones?
    'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
    Or a yawing hole in a battered head
    And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
    And there they lay I damn me eyes
    All lookouts clapped on Paradise
    All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!

  3. #3
    I think we need a healthy amount of these in stock.

    My personal Jaegar will be boomerang themed, and these will be super effective when the economic apocalypse happens.

  4. #4
    Deleted
    Lol, Bomberang, Batwing and Budget Buster. I suggested B-21 Presence. Just hit me i could risk naming a stealth bomber though:/

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Reeve View Post
    Aside from the engines, looks nearly the same as the B-2:



    What woudl be the advantages of this plane? Do we need a long range strike bomber in a world increasingly dominated by cruise missiles and drones?
    Do McDonell-Douglass CEOs need gold plating on their ferraris?
    While you live, shine / Have no grief at all / Life exists only for a short while / And time demands its toll.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by verdamte View Post
    Lol, Bomberang, Batwing and Budget Buster. I suggested B-21 Presence. Just hit me i could risk naming a stealth bomber though:/
    I voted for Penetrator. Give those terrorists the dick.

  7. #7
    I'm all for a good defense, but what exactly makes these so much better than our current B2's? Why spend all that money when there is no competition? Is China building a state of the art bomber or something?

    Same with the F16, best plane around but then they have to build a new model for tons of money. There's nothing out there to compete with the F16.
    .

    "This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."

    -- Capt. Copeland

  8. #8
    Merely a Setback Reeve's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    28,800
    Quote Originally Posted by Hubcap View Post
    I'm all for a good defense, but what exactly makes these so much better than our current B2's? Why spend all that money when there is no competition? Is China building a state of the art bomber or something?

    Same with the F16, best plane around but then they have to build a new model for tons of money. There's nothing out there to compete with the F16.
    I honestly have no idea what the difference is, but if I had to make a guess, it'd be this:

    -Smaller radar cross section, which is valuable if you're making strikes against advanced militaries like Russia and possibly China.
    -Longer range, due to lighter weight materials used in the air frame and body.
    -Better guidance packages
    -Badder ass.
    'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
    Or a yawing hole in a battered head
    And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
    And there they lay I damn me eyes
    All lookouts clapped on Paradise
    All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!

  9. #9
    Deleted
    The B2 has been shot down so many times that they had to develop a better one.

    Right? Right?

  10. #10
    looks cool, nothing else to add.

  11. #11
    Banned BuckSparkles's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Planning Next Vacation
    Posts
    9,217
    Codename: "Black Girth"

  12. #12
    wasted money. we should be spending this stuff on power armor and robotic soldiers.

  13. #13
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by BuckSparkles View Post
    Codename: "Black Girth"
    Codename: "Feed the military industrial complex bums some more government money"

  14. #14
    Merely a Setback Reeve's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    28,800
    The B-2 is the Spirit, right? So maybe the Phantasm? Ghost? Phantom? Boggart? Revenant? Specter?
    'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
    Or a yawing hole in a battered head
    And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
    And there they lay I damn me eyes
    All lookouts clapped on Paradise
    All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!

  15. #15
    Titan Tierbook's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Charleston SC
    Posts
    13,870
    Quote Originally Posted by Sydänyö View Post
    The B2 has been shot down so many times that they had to develop a better one.

    Right? Right?
    Only the Spirit of Kansas has been lost to a crash, no lives lost but expensive.


    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by derpkitteh View Post
    wasted money. we should be spending this stuff on power armor and robotic soldiers.
    Look to DARPA
    Quote Originally Posted by Connal View Post
    I'd never compare him to Hitler, Hitler was actually well educated, and by all accounts pretty intelligent.

  16. #16
    Elemental Lord Templar 331's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Waycross, GA
    Posts
    8,230
    Is this one going to cost an ungodly amount like the last few jets we've been developing?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Reeve View Post
    The B-2 is the Spirit, right? So maybe the Phantasm? Ghost? Phantom? Boggart? Revenant? Specter?
    Dementor

    http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/harrypotter/images/4/49/DementorConceptArt.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20150928152038

  17. #17
    Banned Kontinuum's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Heart of the Fortress
    Posts
    2,404
    Quote Originally Posted by Reeve View Post
    The B-2 is the Spirit, right? So maybe the Phantasm? Ghost? Phantom? Boggart? Revenant? Specter?
    Wraith is winning on that site. I assume it's not an official poll.

  18. #18
    Titan Tierbook's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Charleston SC
    Posts
    13,870
    Quote Originally Posted by Templar 331 View Post
    Is this one going to cost an ungodly amount like the last few jets we've been developing?

    - - - Updated - - -



    Dementor

    http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/...20150928152038
    Engineering and development costs for the program estimate 21.4 billion in 2010 dollars over the life of the program, no idea how many they plan on getting for that but it's pretty cheap. According to wiki they plan to buy 80-100 at 550 million a piece, or 1/3 the cost of a B-2
    Quote Originally Posted by Connal View Post
    I'd never compare him to Hitler, Hitler was actually well educated, and by all accounts pretty intelligent.

  19. #19
    Deleted
    Why not the B-21 Micropenis? I mean, that'd reflect it's purpose a lot more.

  20. #20
    Merely a Setback PACOX's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    ██████
    Posts
    26,382
    Quote Originally Posted by Reeve View Post
    I honestly have no idea what the difference is, but if I had to make a guess, it'd be this:

    -Smaller radar cross section, which is valuable if you're making strikes against advanced militaries like Russia and possibly China.
    -Longer range, due to lighter weight materials used in the air frame and body.
    -Better guidance packages
    -Badder ass.
    Most likely what you said.

    Better stealth capabilities, range and altitude probably. Expanded payload capacity.

    Looks sexy

    Resident Cosplay Progressive

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •