Substances and sexual preference aren't the same.
- - - Updated - - -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correc...ion_of_America
Substances and sexual preference aren't the same.
- - - Updated - - -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correc...ion_of_America
Last edited by Drusyn; 2015-09-02 at 09:20 PM.
hey, you said i cant change what i like. I proved that you can change. Have you never heard of recovered sex addicts?
My sexual attraction(straight) keeps the human race alive. Without Male to female sexual attraction MOST of you people would NOT be born. To make a human YOU NEED A MAN AND A WOMEN to come together.
To answer your question. I never thought about sex until i was 10 years old. I was with my mom at the grocery store and I saw a beautiful blonde lady walking with her massive tits hanging out and i popped a boner.
- - - Updated - - -
ill bet you $100!
Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
People can change sexual preference. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/ma...on-is-possible
- - - Updated - - -
if they stop doing things they used to do. IT HAS CHANGED THEM. They no longer do things they once did, therefore CHANGE has occured within them......
Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
From your link
“These results do not prove that categorical change in sexual orientation is possible for everyone or anyone, but rather that meaningful shifts along a continuum that constitute real changes appear possible for some,” states a press release announcing the study. The release also emphasizes, “the results do not prove that no one is harmed by the attempt to change, but rather that the attempt does not appear to be harmful on average or inherently harmful.”
No, but when he resorted to petty attacks on me on a personal level instead of attacking my ideas, he lost the debate. That's why he got banned. He couldnt control himself.
- - - Updated - - -
Yea, which is different from what you claimed to be fact. Which was that sexual preference cannot be changed.
Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
Your link makes it sound like the study was essentially a waste of time sinceWhich means they did nothing but prove that it may be possible, "may" doesn't mean that it is. Let me know when you find a study that actually changes peoples preference.“These results do not prove that categorical change in sexual orientation is possible for everyone or anyone, but rather that meaningful shifts along a continuum that constitute real changes appear possible for some,”
But homo sapiens sapiens females are fertile from the point of first ovulation, and a homo sapiens sapiens males produce fertile sperm throughout the life, thus the mating could easily produce offspring regardless of male age.
Thus are homosexuals more evil, since their mating won't produce offspring in contrast to heterosexual pedophiles?
This discussion is a time machine and takes me back a good decade. I remember people asking back then: Imagine you popped a boner to a dark haired man's huge butt instead. Would you call yourself evil?
I asked for evidence, not your opinion and your comparison of sexual release to drug abuse.
Last edited by mmoc1c1d6a1668; 2015-09-02 at 09:47 PM.
That website makes me sick. I'd like to know who the people buying that stuff are and why and how they get permission to sell the clips/vids.. I can't think of any other reason than pedophilia. Also, those pictures are only a sample of the site. Sure, they are just naked pictures of children, nothing out of the ordinary to a regular person but if someone is attracted to young children I can easily see this turning them on. I have 0 tolerance for that behaviour or attitude towards innocent children.
If the child isn't being hurt, forced, maimed or otherwise placed in a sexually provocative pose or whatnot I can't really make an argument against it that doesn't tread ground on "Eww".
People beat off to my little pony, plastic figurines, worms all kinds of freaky shit.
If the intent is to sell these pictures to paedophiles directly then it might catch a distribution charge in certain countries and states.
But intent is the key and sole factor here in this example where no abuse has been proven and no exploitation has been proven.
Did you even read the study Drusyn?
"Jones and Yarhouse’s results show the majority of candidates were successful in their goal of changing sexual orientation, and that the attempt was not harmful on average.
Of the original 98 subjects, 61 were successfully categorized for general outcome at the last assessment. Fifty-three percent were categorized as successful outcomes; specifically, 23 percent reported success in the form of an essential change to heterosexual orientation and functioning, while an additional 30 percent reported no longer identifying as homosexual while maintaining stable behavioral chastity. "
Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
Because nudism is a lifestyle to some people and they want to celebrate it, simple as that. We should write to the pedo's in prison and ask them what they have gotten off to in life. I think the results would show that any depiction of a child was enough to do it for them. Just imagine the most attractive person you can, then imagine them in any situation a kid could be in (at the pool, at a wedding, at wal-mart, etc) then ask yourself if you would still be attracted to them. If the answer is yes then pedo's probably find kids in those situations just as attractive as they do in legit CP. If you wanted to completely remove all masturbatory material for pedophiles then you'd probably have to ban any image of kids and ban cameras too because they probably take their own candid pictures as well.
I agree it would be a bitch to have pedophiliac urges and no way to satisfy them, but want can you do what can be done to help them? Conversion therapy doesn't work at least that is what we have been told when used on homosexuals and it has been said it is actually harmful. so do we still allow them to live freely in society and hope that their urges don't get the best of them and thy go rape some poor child. what's is the answer?