Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
LastLast
  1. #1

    Isn't the WoW movie about 5 years too late?

    Had this movie come out when WoW was at it's peak, both in terms of popularity and public interest, I get the feeling it would have been a much bigger deal.

    As such, I just don't see the movie doing anything, it will probably not bomb, but likely not do anything of note at the box office anyway, probably just make it's money back.

    Seems like they missed their window.

  2. #2
    Missed it by a mile.

  3. #3
    Development started early 2006 and was in development hell for quite a while. The convenience and technology of CGI was one big factor and they had disagreements during preproduction. Remember the infamous Uwe Boll wanting to direct it a long time ago and blizzard's response?

  4. #4
    The Lightbringer
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    3,235
    No its not. Many movies were based on the books, movies and franchises that were released 10-20-60-100+ years ago and some of them were quite good and popular.
    So no, the movie is not late.

  5. #5
    Would've been great if it had come out around Wrath's peak, when Blizzard's advertising machine was at its strongest - what with the celebrity commercials and mountain dew promotions and stuff.

    Now it's coming out literally just a few months short of a decade after it was announced... should be interesting to see how much interest is still there. Judging by the initial WoD numbers though (the three million jump), it should do just fine. And if it doesn't, China will make up for it.

  6. #6
    Epic!
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,583
    Quote Originally Posted by Zaqwert View Post
    Had this movie come out when WoW was at it's peak, both in terms of popularity and public interest, I get the feeling it would have been a much bigger deal.

    As such, I just don't see the movie doing anything, it will probably not bomb, but likely not do anything of note at the box office anyway, probably just make it's money back.

    Seems like they missed their window.
    Absolutely right, but they kept delaying it and delaying it. Plus it looks far too CGI heavy, like they cheaped out by only making a handful of real sets.

  7. #7
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by tangers58 View Post
    Absolutely right, but they kept delaying it and delaying it. Plus it looks far too CGI heavy, like they cheaped out by only making a handful of real sets.
    You do know a good CGI is harder to make than build a set, right?

  8. #8
    Spam Assassin! MoanaLisa's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Tralfamadore
    Posts
    32,405
    Yes, I think it's late. I also sense that people believe that Blizzard has total control over the project. I can tell you they don't. They don't set the release date and it all had to wait until everything lined up properly in Hollywood. Hollywood got it into turnaround for a number of years and Hollywood is the one that got it out. They did so with Blizzard's help, support and encouragement but once a production/distribution company and a director were named, Blizzard had much less control over this than people generally think.
    "...money's most powerful ability is to allow bad people to continue doing bad things at the expense of those who don't have it."

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Zaqwert View Post
    Had this movie come out when WoW was at it's peak, both in terms of popularity and public interest, I get the feeling it would have been a much bigger deal.

    As such, I just don't see the movie doing anything, it will probably not bomb, but likely not do anything of note at the box office anyway, probably just make it's money back.

    Seems like they missed their window.
    It's not a WoW movie first off.

    Second, the market:
    Anyone who's played the original RTS 1-3, any Blizzard fans, gaming fans in general who want this to succeed just to be the first good adaptation, to break the door down for the rest of good video game movies just like what Marvel and DC did with comic books, anyone who's ever played WoW, 40 million Hearthstone players, fantasy fanatics in general, curious new audiences who want to see something new, and the foreign markets where WoW is still beloved like China/Korea. China alone will make this movie hundreds of millions.

    Not to mention Duncan Jones' fanbase and David Bowie's. I know people who will see this just for David Bowie.

    People will see this just because it has Travis Fimmel from Vikings.

    As if China wasn't already insane about Warcraft, their sex symbol Daniel Wu plays Gul'Dan.

    No it's not too late. Was LOTR 50 years too late? That argument is ridiculous.
    Last edited by tangocash; 2016-02-06 at 08:42 AM.

  10. #10
    Legendary!
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    If you knew you would run the other way.
    Posts
    6,763
    Quote Originally Posted by tangocash View Post
    No it's not too late. Was LOTR 50 years too late? That argument is ridiculous.
    This ^ exactly the Lord of The Rings was published and released in three parts from July 1954 to October 1955, and when Peter Jackson finally was allowed to make the movie he had to cut a lot of what he filmed out due to the wishes of Tolkien's family..

    But it is true the argument that the Warcraft movie is years late is really stupid, some people have no idea how long it can take to get a movie to be made.. From getting permission from the original owner of the IP to deciding how it should go, to writing a script, casting the characters and so much more..

  11. #11
    I am Murloc! Zoaric's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The United States of America, Rapture, or Orgrimmar
    Posts
    5,935
    Quote Originally Posted by tangers58 View Post
    Absolutely right, but they kept delaying it and delaying it. Plus it looks far too CGI heavy, like they cheaped out by only making a handful of real sets.
    In what world is 110 real sets a "handful of real sets"?
    Quote Originally Posted by Yvaelle View Post
    You can't fight porn on the internet, you may as well declare war on something overwhelming like water on Earth's surface - or something ephemeral like "terror" (lol sorry, had to do it) - or something both overwhelming and ephemeral... like porn on the internet.

  12. #12
    Yeah but then we wouldn't have such state of the art graphics.

    Oh...

  13. #13
    What WoW movie? It's just Warcraft.

  14. #14
    No? Now WoW is in decline, good time for a movie.

    Also advances in tech...
    Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/djuntas ARPG - RTS - MMO

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Kurgath View Post
    You do know a good CGI is harder to make than build a set, right?
    Ultimately the idea is to use as much practical effects and set as much as possible and to only use CGI for those that cant be achieve with practical fx due to money, resource, etc.

    Visual Effects and Practical Effects take a majority of time planning during pre-production. Financially, they both are toe to toe. Majority of the money for V.FX goes into post while Practical FX mostly goes into pre-production.

    James Cameron could've had much more of a convenient and simple time using CGI for Titanic but instead chose to rebuild the Titanic; not only that it was larger than the original Titanic. In this case, I would consider it much harder approach he decided to take but in compensation for better realism.

  16. #16
    The Lightbringer Bosen's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,431
    It's never too late for a good movie. If it turns out great, maybe it'll change things for the better in-game.

  17. #17
    Since the population is in decline, now is a good time for the movie to arrive. It will be a massive promotion for WoW.

  18. #18
    Yes, it did come out later than what would have been the best for it.

    Had this movie come out during its peak, around 2008-2010, it would have had been completely insane.

    But due to all the issues, delays, change of direction, etc (all for valid reasons), it just didn't happen. It will probably still be a success, but it would have had a lot more impact and success had it come out at the peak of players and popularity, without a doubt.

    That's impossible to disagree with...

  19. #19
    Legendary! Frolk's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Norway, Lørenskog
    Posts
    6,546
    Maybe not 5, but around 3 years to late in my opinion
    PROUD TRUMP SUPPORTER, #2024Trump #MAGA
    PROUD TRUMP CAMPAIGN SUPPORTER #SaveEuropeWithTrump
    PROUD SUPPORTER OF THE WALL
    BLUE LIVES MATTER
    NO TO ALL GUNCONTROL OR BACKGROUND CHECKS IN EUROPE
    /s

  20. #20
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by tangocash View Post
    It's not a WoW movie first off.
    ...
    No it's not too late. Was LOTR 50 years too late? That argument is ridiculous.
    It's still going to be lumped into the same category. Yes, it is still a wow movie, because it's basically a story from a developer from blizzard who just so happens to work on wow.

    Not really seeing how wow compares to LOTR, but at least it was good for a laugh.

    That being said, I don't think it's going to bomb (short term at least), but it's not going to break the box office by any means. I think the biggest thing they have going for them is the selected cast members, give it a year and nobody will be talking about the movie. Unless they decide to go the land before time route and milk it, at which point only the die-hard fans will nerd out on it.

    One final thing before I'm out:

    I LOL'd at the money-grab attempt. Blizzard is basically considering bribing people with in-game items to go see the movie.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •