Originally Posted by
The Madgod
In other words, you're a nitpick. If you want to say why that 9% depression across the board lessens avoidance's value, show us the math, with both direct and relative values, please. Both are important in the deduction of a loss in value, especially if you want to compare it to something else. You only get part of the picture if you use one. This isn't bringing up the debate, this is stating ground rules. We both have to do the math we don't like as much, seems fair, no?