I am a little disappointed about the lack of critical thinking that goes behind analyzing these logs.
Elpadrino- Yes 104k for Imperial is awesome. But lets dig deeper.
1) You are doing normal in 496 gear. Where does your item level compare to other people parsing for Normal Imperial?
-Even if top guilds killed normal Imperial first week in your item level, how many more weeks of practice have you gotten vs. how many they got?
2) Pyroblast was your top damage critting 55% of the time. Is this normal for you or lucky?
3) Did you get exhaled or mc'ed?
4) I'm not saying you don't have skill, it takes more than RNG to parse top 100; however, how certain are you that you could reproduce the results?
Also, it is awesome that you are still top damage in your guild, and that fire is treating you well so far... but that does not mean it is as good as you make it out to be.
Top 5 specs (best ---> worst) for each fight that aren't mage specs. (what percentile people that play those specs in your guild are)
Protectors... You were 75% percentile
Aff Lock (74%)
Balance (none)
S Priest (71%)
Combat (87%)
Frost DK (60%)
Tsulong... you were 89%
Frost DK (63%)
Warrior (39%)
Aff Lock (33%)
BM (78%)
Windwalker (39%)
I could go on, but I would imagine the picture would remain the same. You are consistently outperforming other top specs for each fight. Would your place @ number 1 in your guilds charts continue if your guildies performed better?
Again, I'm not doubting your skill as a fire mage, but a lot more is going on than the "fire is fine" picture that you created. Have you gotten any bad streaks? I played fire post hot fix, with a 493 ilvl and haven't gotten anywhere close to the results you have. Some fights my fb/pyro crit percentage is as low as 35%. Some other fights my highest ignite has been just shy of 40k. It's not like I'm a terrible player (
http://worldoflogs.com/reports/rt-iebx9ml234olwbzd/).
But in the end, like GC says, small sample sizes are small.
Cheers and GL with RNG,
Heisen