No of course not. That would be moronic.
No of course not. That would be moronic.
the only fox i trust is fox at 10 which is the local news for me
because its hard to spin that stuff since its all just events etc
Clearly this is a result of poorly written law and no reasonable judge would enforce him having to pay child support.
I knew something was strange when I read "sperm donor ordered to pay child support" then I read "Craigslist ad for a donor in March 2009. "... That must be one desperate man.
Either way, I hope it just gets thrown out and the lady gets hit with a newspaper and they say, "no...just...no".
This is dumb but for future do it only in hospital, don't trust people, they will fuck you over.
"kansas sperm doner paying child support", is what i googled. Ran ccleaner and regmechanic and im still getting fox #1. I never go to foxnews unless its a single article someone linked, weird.
I'd like to know why he thought providing the sperm for a crazy lesbian couples eight child would work out well... 8! No wonder they are living off the State. That's like giving an eigth cat to a cat lady, but much worse. How many do they need!
When you see someone in a thread making the same canned responses over and over, click their name, click view forum posts, and see if they are a troll. Then don't feed them."Gamer" is not a bad word. I identify as a gamer. When calling out those who persecute and harass, the word you're looking for is "asshole." @_DonAdams
https://www.google.com/search?q=man+...ient=firefox-a
This is what I get. So cool your jets. Not a single fox news article there. A couple conservative cave but who the hell are they.
---------- Post added 2013-01-01 at 12:37 AM ----------
Guess you didn't read the article. They were providing for them until the one "mother" of the donor child was stricken with a personal illness and hasn't been able to work.
An interesting twist would be that if this were a male gay couple who couldnt afford to support the child they would both be thrown in jail.
"This is what I get. So cool your jets. Not a single fox news article there. A couple conservative cave but who the hell are they."
Its all about how you phrase your search apparently
That is why I have never donated Sperm, part of the fine print states that shit like this can happen.
Because that's a silly analogy that has nothing to do with this case. The child is his. It is his genetic material and no informal agreement can waive that responsibility.
That's how it'd work when donating through an approved clinic. Unfortunately, because they decided to ghetto-rig the process by involving a donor from Craigslist there's no valid, legally-binding agreement which frees him of responsibility. To use an over the top analogy (and I hate using these), if you signed a contract that says I can kill you, and I did, I'd still be charged with murder, or manslaughter, or whatever. In the majority of circumstances there is no opt-out when it comes to the law.