The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities.
Pathetic saber rattling from a backwards dictatorship to boost popularity for a fat retard son of a another retard
If one nuclear weapon is detonated anywhere near the continental United States then North Korea will be wiped off the map
"Arch-enemy" Really? Do these guys think they're in some sort of movie...
I advise everybody to look at this guys post history before taking him seriously. He first claimed to be Portugese, living in Lisbon, then he switched to being North Korean when a thread about North Korea appeared.
http://www.mmo-champion.com/search.p...057&pp=&page=7
Bush and Cheney must be so pissed that someone is legitimately talking shit now.
I disagree. Well; I won't say Martin is objectively very good (which he isn't, really, but then: He doesn't explicitly SAY so in his forewords, either).
Jordan is much, much deeper. Though the main plot is predictable since it's already been told by just about every religion ever, and is the staple of Zoroastrian theology, the world behind it is much deeper. Where Erikson's world has magic 'because it's cool and fantasy and stuff,' the magic in the Wheel of Time has a purpose, and ties in directly with the physics of said world. Not surprising, of course, since Jordan was a physics major.
Erikson, however, just throws gods about like candy, and everything happens because of, ultimately, Deus Ex Machina. His prose is winded and lacks rhythm, colourful and descriptive though it is. His 'more magic' approach really merely serves to take the actual magic out of it. When every conundrum and plot problem is solved by 'Gods! Magic! I want it to happen THIS way, and logic be damned,' then the flair quickly vanishes. There is no pseudo-scientific reason for this magic to actually be possible; the least Erikson could have done was make the fabric of reality interactive to some degree by ways of human interference, but it merely ís.
There is a reason I compared him to Kim Jung Il. I'll agree that Erikson writes better and more coherent than Kim Jung Il ever could, but both make promises they do not live up to.
I'm going to check up on Abercombie and Wolfe, as I am unfamiliar with their works (and will therefore not judge them), but if you want to respond to this, I invite you to take our dual to PM, since I'm out of analogies to tie our little fun to the topic itself.
My friend, you are too optimistic...
12th place would be an improvement. Try rank 35th....
Household Download Index
Based on millions of recent test results from Speedtest.net, this index compares and ranks consumer download speeds around the globe. The value is the rolling mean throughput in Mbps over the past 30 days where the mean distance between the client and the server is less than 300 miles.
http://www.netindex.com/download/allcountries/
So, this is as close as the practical real data it gets.. It's what the turn out is on a daily basis. Not idealized.
And there's a heap of information to be found, if someone just looks for it.
http://www.techspot.com/news/45566-u...umber-one.html
http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/9/323...internet-speed
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1855054.html
So, for an American who doesn't know that yet. You need to get out of your bubble .
Learn that whenever you hear someone (usually politicians) says, USA #1 country, they lie to you. There's only 2 rankings where the USA holds that spot.
1. Economy. It's the largest in the World (doesn't mean the most successful tho)
2. Military Spending.
Anything else... Other countries outperform the USA more and more..
Internet is part of the infrastructure, and that goes to shits since decades. Land pockets where local community improves the infrastructure aren't unfortunately the measure for the entire country. Some 40 miles from me, they've installed fiber optic wiring for an entire county. Nice results. 100Mbps internet, for 5 bucks a month.
Well, here where I am it's more back to normal. 6Mbps max.
As for NK.... hell I dunno what their deal is. I was really surprised by those news. Especially since they recently "changed" all of a sudden with rather pleasant tidbits of news, which pointed towards an opening and reasoning. And now that. I have no clue what to make of that.
They attack the U.S, this results in the U.S military, Canadian Military, European Military, as well as possibly several other large countries to get involved and storm North Korea.
Forget Iraq, they only went there to get oil, imagine if you will the consequences of targeting U.S soil. Forget China for a moment, North Korea would be wiped off the map before they could even counterattack the U.S's Counterattack.
That being said if that does come to light, i wouldnt deny the possibility of a WW3, I hope it never happens though
The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities.