Unbearable? Because of what? That silly optional dialogue everybody is needlessly upset about?
He has a very reason to distrust Alliance, since Dealin Proudmore was following Darkspears since they left Stranglethron Vale, He sent his fleet on Echo Isles, to give them extra traumatic experiences. Darkspears were the most humble and intelligent among tribes, and Alliance soldiers were hunting after them for the sake of hunting them becuase they're "Evil trolls".
And later they still had some troubles with Kul'Tiras who stationated on Durotar. He had very bad experiences with Alliance, and he has much more reson to keep them at bay. The question was:
- why should he outright tell Alliance soldier in what deep trouble and stress he is?
- why would he be nice, if so far they had been fighting for so long.
All he did was being straight with them, there was no room to be extra polite.
And really Vol'Jin did a favour to Alliance by telling them about the Zandalari uprising. He is much more fair than Garrosh and Sylvanas. And yet people get to this ridiculous statement that he is far worse than those two becuase he acted mean. Big shock- he is a troll after all. They're meant to be sarcastic, distrustful and foul at some point.
I disliked Vol'Jin for not siding with Zandalari, beceause as a huge fan I wanted to see at least one Empire to get restored, and brought back to it's former glory, msot troll players wished this to happen, wished to see all tribes united, and yet we're forced to fight them.
but as Horde leader he is at the moment the most balanced among the rest of the leaders (Baine is too peaceful imo, and i'd be afriad that we would have Thrall 2.0)
He distrust and yet respect the enemy, to the point he can see thier purpose.
So again? Why is he "unbearable" while Garrosh and Sylvanas did much more harm to the Aliance, and are open threat to them?