Spring 2013 Poll: Democratic Presidential Candidate for 2016

[Nakura Chambers]

God help us if ANY Democrat wins any sort of public office in the near future. This would be like that slut Sandra Fluke becoming President. Great for the Blacks, bad for everyone else.

I'd argue that it's terrible for the blacks. Democrats don't care about the blacks, they only care about their votes.

[LichslayerX]

Right, because the Republican controlled House is making all sorts of headway as regards solving the nations problems. -sarcasm-

Calling Sandra Fluke a "slut" really does nothing to help the Republicans' image as misogynists.

Oh shuddap. The Democrat Controlled House only achieved more socialized bullcrap. The Repubs only got in control because people HATE Obamacare. And she is a Slut. I see no reason to be politically correct when calling people what they are, I aint Rush but I see his point. Same way I see the IRS's crap as more of the same.

[Elegiac]

I'd argue that it's terrible for the blacks. Democrats don't care about the blacks, they only care about their votes.

Which is different from any elected politician, how?

At least the Democrats aren't actively trying to push legislation that marginalizes African-Americans or any minority group for that matter.

[Grizzly Willy]

Oh shuddap. The Democrat Controlled House only achieved more socialized bullcrap. The Repubs only got in control because people HATE Obamacare. And she is a Slut. I see no reason to be politically correct when calling people what they are, I aint Rush but I see his point. Same way I see the IRS's crap as more of the same.

Explain why then.

And do continue the antagonism, you're making yourself look great.

[LichslayerX]

No No, their only propogating the Entitled vibe Blacks use, and setting the Black Panther Party up as the new KKK. Oppressed become the oppressors. Sick sad fact of life. It was the Dems though who wanted to circumvent the constitution and give the pile of crap we currently call President a Third Term. Thank god that failed. I'd hate to see our Campaigner in Chief Bullshit his way to another win. And yes it was bullshit. Benghazi will get him impeached one would hope.

[Elegiac]

Oh shuddap. The Democrat Controlled House only achieved more socialized bullcrap. The Repubs only got in control because people HATE Obamacare. And she is a Slut. I see no reason to be politically correct when calling people what they are, I aint Rush but I see his point. Same way I see the IRS's crap as more of the same.

1) "Socialised" stuff isn't necessarily bad.
2) You realize the basic principles of Obamacare were formulated by Republicans, right? It's a federal version of Romneycare.
3) How does having an active sex life make someone a "slut"?

---------- Post added 2013-05-12 at 12:01 AM ----------

No No, their only propogating the Entitled vibe Blacks use, and setting the Black Panther Party up as the new KKK. Oppressed become the oppressors. Sick sad fact of life. It was the Dems though who wanted to circumvent the constitution and give the pile of crap we currently call President a Third Term. Thank god that failed. I'd hate to see our Campaigner in Chief Bullshit his way to another win. And yes it was bullshit. Benghazi will get him impeached one would hope.

Source please.

Also, what do you expect to happen if he got impeached?

[LilSaihah]

Oh shuddap. The Democrat Controlled House only achieved more socialized bullcrap. The Repubs only got in control because people HATE Obamacare. And she is a Slut. I see no reason to be politically correct when calling people what they are, I aint Rush but I see his point. Same way I see the IRS's crap as more of the same.

do we actually have a record of how many dicks she's sucked as that's the most important quantifier of sluttery there is
i mean, unless you mean it in a more abstract sense, like she's selling herself out to big business or something
in which case you should probably rename congress House of Sluts

[Nakura Chambers]

Which is different from any elected politician, how?

At least the Democrats aren't actively trying to push legislation that marginalizes African-Americans or any minority group for that matter.

No, they're just exploiting minorities and promising them a "salvation" that will never come and that they have no intention of delivering.

[Grizzly Willy]

No No, their only propogating the Entitled vibe Blacks use, and setting the Black Panther Party up as the new KKK. Oppressed become the oppressors. Sick sad fact of life. It was the Dems though who wanted to circumvent the constitution and give the pile of crap we currently call President a Third Term. Thank god that failed. I'd hate to see our Campaigner in Chief Bullshit his way to another win. And yes it was bullshit. Benghazi will get him impeached one would hope.

Not really worth talking to if all you have are regurgitated talking points. Where was this push for a third term? Why will Benghazi get him impeached? How are they propping up a violent racist group?

[Elegiac]

No, they're just exploiting minorities and promising them a "salvation" that will never come and that they have no intention of delivering.

Oh? Which party is the one pushing for equality for homosexuals, for example?

(Hint: It's not the Republicans)

[Nakura Chambers]

No No, their only propogating the Entitled vibe Blacks use, and setting the Black Panther Party up as the new KKK. Oppressed become the oppressors. Sick sad fact of life. It was the Dems though who wanted to circumvent the constitution and give the pile of crap we currently call President a Third Term. Thank god that failed. I'd hate to see our Campaigner in Chief Bullshit his way to another win. And yes it was bullshit. Benghazi will get him impeached one would hope.

This is what conservatives actually believe, you guys!

Protip: Nice avatar.

[Grizzly Willy]

This is what conservatives actually believe, you guys!

Protip: Nice avatar.

I wouldn't be surprised if the two aren't connected, to be honest.

[Nakura Chambers]

I wouldn't be surprised if the two aren't connected, to be honest.

You know, you might be on to something here...

My favorite avatar is the one the LichslayerX is going to have next though.

[Cthulhu 2020]

I think the point of background checks is made completely irrelevant when there's a flea market about 10 miles outside of my city where I can buy fully functional guns for a small mark up from what they cost at wal-mart.

The counter argument I hear to this all too often is "Every American should be armed," without any real hint of exceptions to that.

[Elegiac]

I think the point of background checks is made completely irrelevant when there's a flea market about 10 miles outside of my city where I can buy fully functional guns for a small mark up from what they cost at wal-mart.

The counter argument I hear to this all too often is "Every American should be armed," without any real hint of exceptions to that.

Getting a gun should be as difficult as getting a driver's license and a car, really.

[Cthulhu 2020]

I wouldn't be surprised if the two aren't connected, to be honest.

It's a shame that there are rules on these forums to call something that walks, quacks, and looks like a duck, a duck.

[Nakura Chambers]

I think the point of background checks is made completely irrelevant when there's a flea market about 10 miles outside of my city where I can buy fully functional guns for a small mark up from what they cost at wal-mart.

The counter argument I hear to this all too often is "Every American should be armed," without any real hint of exceptions to that.

If they're "regularly engaging in business" then it's illegal, unless they have a Federal Firearms License. I'm assuming by "gun show loophole," Wells was referring to how individuals can "occasionally" sell their firearms at gun shows (or anywhere else for that matter). Banning this will hurt law abiding citizens who are trying to sell their firearms. If I'm strapped for cash and need to sell my M1 Garand, then why should I be allowed to selling it at a gun show (or as you mentioned, a flea market)? How is this any different from me selling a gun to someone on Craigslist? Or putting up flyers in the local paper? Or selling it to my brother or to a friend?



And, here's the real kicker, if the bills the gun control lobby proposes are to explicitly "close the gun show loophole," then why are there provisions in those bills to ban ALL private firearms transactions, including those that take place outside of gun shows?

Hint: Because it's not about gun shows, it's about banning all private firearms transactions.

[Cthulhu 2020]

That's not a loophole, it's the law. And it's not about gun shows, it's about banning all private firearms transactions.

The gun control lobby uses the phrase "closing the gun show loophole," because it sounds less authoritarian than "banning gun owners from selling/giving their guns to their friends and family." Just like how they use the words "assault rifle" and "assault weapon" to describe semi-automatic and bolt-action rifles, when they know full well that such rifles only fire one bullet when the trigger is pulled. It's all just an attempt by the gun grabbers to use scare tactics to deceive the public.

Or on the flip side, saying "banning gun owners from selling/giving their guns to their friends and family," sounds a whole lot more sinister and fear inducing than saying "banning people from selling guns to potential criminals because there is a market for that."

[Nakura Chambers]

Or on the flip side, saying "banning gun owners from selling/giving their guns to their friends and family," sounds a whole lot more sinister and fear inducing than saying "banning people from selling guns to potential criminals because there is a market for that."

Every human being is a potential criminal. And it's already illegal to sell guns to someone you suspect may be a criminal and/or mentally impaired.

[Cthulhu 2020]

If they're "regularly engaging in business" then it's illegal, unless they have a Federal Firearms License. I'm assuming by "gun show loophole," Wells was referring to how individuals can "occasionally" sell their firearms at gun shows (or anywhere else for that matter). Banning this will hurt law abiding citizens who are trying to sell their firearms. If I'm strapped for cash and need to sell my M1 Garand, then why should I be allowed to selling it at a gun show (or as you mentioned, a flea market)? How is this any different from me selling a gun to someone on Craigslist? Or putting up flyers in the local paper? Or selling it to my brother or to a friend?



And, here's the real kicker, if the bills the gun control lobby proposes are to explicitly "close the gun show loophole," then why are there provisions in those bills to ban ALL private firearms transactions, including those that take place outside of gun shows?

Hint: Because it's not about gun shows, it's about banning all private firearms transactions.

Or you know, it's about making the fact that we have background checks make those background checks still legitimate. This flea market is also, as far as I am aware, 100% legal. Last I heard since these people don't make a significant amount of their income from guns, they don't need a dealer's license.

I realize that you think there's some kind of sinister conspiracy behind any gun control whatsoever, but our current laws are really shitty when you get right down to it.

---------- Post added 2013-05-12 at 03:24 AM ----------

Every human being is a potential criminal. And it's already illegal to sell guns to someone you suspect may be a criminal and/or mentally impaired.

I'm sure you can see the testimony of "The man didn't seem like that bad of a fellow to me."