Originally Posted by
Wafffles
You claim it's impossible to win reliably, and then disregard an attempt to show some people can win reliably as "made up bullcrap". It's pretty easy to win an argument when evidence to your claim is automatically deemed accurate, and any evidence to the contrary is automatically deemed fake.
I suppose the possibility that people out there really do have 80-90% win rates isn't even worth suggesting? A deck such as control shaman, for example, which is pretty popular for leveling up from 25 with few losses? He said he'd played less than 50 games, so he doesn't exactly need an elite deck to win a large majority of them. Of course, it's a lot easier to automatically claim a game is broken than to spend half an hour considering the *oh so remote* possibility that you're not playing optimally.