Am I the only one to think they are imp skulls? Based on the size of them, they would be small even for a baby.
nope, someone posted on page 2 :P I think Imp.
Last edited by Eon Drache; 2014-02-25 at 06:54 PM.
My best guess is that they didn't really thinked about it.
But thoses could be orc skulls anyway, without their under jaw.
Last edited by mmocafdd20634a; 2014-02-25 at 07:57 PM.
Don't you have anything better to do with your time? lol
They're gnome skulls you numb skulls.
Skull on the bottom right of that picture fits the bill as a human skull.
Blizzard doesn't give a shit about lore anymore anyways.
My Nintendo FC is 2208-5726-4303.By Blizzard Entertainment:
Part of the reason is that Battlegrounds are like ducks.
Maybe thats a picture of Gul'dan from ANOTHER time line.
So... someone makes a thread about the size of Gul'dan's skulls.
And yet no one complains about Grom's stripe tattoo, instead of Full-Jaw?
Midgets have close to regular sized heads. That's why they look a bit weird proportionally compared to non-midgets.
and you didn't think alike. You came to a weird illogical guess, Compstance made a logical one. Baby skulls (judging by the size) is a lot more likely, unless it's a race of a small humanoid creature.
Not what i was expecting when i clicked.
You guys have too much time...
maybe they are rocks carved into skulls.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead