Fastest way to level, 1-60 in under 2 minutes

[Destroyed]

Don't post exploits, please.

[Deleted]

Thanks to blizzard not thinking these events through

Yeah, well. Color me surprised that software has bugs, or that a hours-fresh patch has an exploit. Unheard of. You might want to report this to Blizzard as well. Also, I'm not 100% sure posting exploits is allowed on the forums. Might be safer just to remove the video and explanation, unless you want to gamble with infractions.

[Mamut]

People will always find a way to exploit (maybe a bad word but nvm) some mechanics. I hope blizz will fast fix this.

[Dezerte]

Seems more like an case of 'clever use of game mechanics' than 'exploit'.

[Deleted]

Seems more like an case of 'clever use of game mechanics' than 'exploit'.

It's obviously unintended. When something is unintended and it is clearly apparent to you (as is in this case), and you still go ahead and use it, it's considered an exploit. Bugs and coding errors aren't considered game mechanics, at the very least not intended game mechanics, and the "intended" -part is key here.

You can feign ignorance on anything. That, however, changes nothing.

[Asmekiel]

It's a cursed chest event. They kinda exist to give a boost to exp and probably gear, why else would it want you to defeat 100 monsters in a minute?

[Dezerte]

It's obviously unintended. When something is unintended and it is clearly apparent to you (as is in this case), and you still go ahead and use it, it's considered an exploit. Bugs and coding errors aren't considered game mechanics, at the very least not intended game mechanics, and the "intended" -part is key here.

You can feign ignorance on anything. That, however, changes nothing.

That's really up to the developers, whether it's deemed an exploit or not, though.

[Deleted]

And here I thought that 1-60 in two mins was for WoW, not diablo 3 :P

[Deleted]

I'm too inexperienced with Diablo3 (only played through it once to see the story), but this surely can't be intended?

[Arkenaw]

Well considering there are basically infinite levels now it's probably intended, but only blizzard knows...

[Deleted]

I know what I'll be doing this afternoon, thanks.

[xenogear3]

And here I thought that 1-60 in two mins was for WoW, not diablo 3 :P

That will never happen.
Blizzard wants $60.

[xytech]

How's the risk? Think it's likely receiving a ban? Personally I doubt it as it won't really affect anyone else, but I've no experience with such.

[Gallahadd]

Myeh, just strikes me as the old Shrine Farming Bug MkII.

Will probably be fixed sooner or later, but in the grand scheme of things it's not THAT vital or game breaking.

[Asmekiel]

I can see Blizzard reverting to the D2 method of experience, where you get the most experience per kill from mobs around your level. That will completely remove boosting lower levels though with the way mob levels work now.

[Fencers]

Rather irrelevent. The core gameplay is not leveling. Completely minor that it can be done quickly from a gameplay POV. Its just an time extension device, leveling.

[Hottage]

If this is intended I'll be all over it like a tramp on chips.

[Djuntas]

Rather irrelevent. The core gameplay is not leveling. Completely minor that it can be done quickly from a gameplay POV. Its just an time extension device, leveling.

This. Have people seen what paragon levels does anyway? Not that huge difference. But I'm sure its fixed within 48 hours.

[Arkenaw]

Anyone online right now? I want to try this but haven't played in like 6 months so no friends online.

[Haven2011]

I don't see this as problem or anything you start of on master at lvl 1 now so this isn't really and issue