Wells did the legwork for both of us. My point was that the issue is more nuanced than people make it out to be.
I'm not trying to prove it to you, because I don't really care that much. I was pointing out that there's more to the issue than an average pay gap.
Men working in female dominated professions tend to get paid more, sometimes for good reason because of their career choices. Sometimes for no reason. If a man is getting paid more to do the same job as a woman, in a profession usually dominated by women, I think that makes a fairly clear point that something is amiss.I also don't understand why the jobs being female dominant somehow implies sexism more than male dominant jobs. Just because somebody said so?
Human progress isn't measured by industry. It's measured by the value you place on a life.
Just, be kind.
“Humanism means that the man is the measure of all things...But it is not only that man must start from himself in the area of knowledge and learning, but any value system must come arbitrarily from man himself by arbitrary choice.” - Francis A. Schaeffer
I actually looked up nursing and teaching and found valid reason for averages. Now specific scenarios it don't mention, Google took me to lots of anecdotal stories.. true or not isn't something I can make the call on, but as far as averages go two previous posts explain it.
Secutaries... not a clue though. Given those were your three examples.
“Humanism means that the man is the measure of all things...But it is not only that man must start from himself in the area of knowledge and learning, but any value system must come arbitrarily from man himself by arbitrary choice.” - Francis A. Schaeffer
Why don't more employers hire more women if they can get them for so much cheaper? I mean all things being the same as men, like work performance, work ethic, work qualifications, it should be a no-brainer? Right?
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
What people call impartiality may simply mean indifference, and what people call partiality may simply mean mental activity.
There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism.
-GK Chesterton
“Humanism means that the man is the measure of all things...But it is not only that man must start from himself in the area of knowledge and learning, but any value system must come arbitrarily from man himself by arbitrary choice.” - Francis A. Schaeffer
That isn't how these figures come about. Like for like, they earn the same. But individual cases create these statistics that people think apply all cases.
Take the 12% less figure from early in the thread. Women might be earning 88% of what men earn because a variety of factors. Men do more overtime, take less sick days, less career breaks, less toil days, more unpaid overtime to advance careers, spend less time with their families voluntarily.
Goverment control of healthcare.... what could POSSIBLE go wrong with that...
Donald trump meme:
Let me get this straight...
We're going to be "gifted" with a health care plan we are forced to
purchase and fined if we don't, which purportedly covers at least ten
million more people, without adding a single new doctor, but provides for
16,000 new IRS agents, written by a committee whose chairman says he
doesn't understand it, passed by a Congress who didn't read it but
exempted themselves from it, and signed by a Dumbo President who smokes,
with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes,
for which we'll be taxed for four years before any benefits take effect,
by a government who has already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare,
all to be overseen by a Surgeon General who is obese, and financed by a
country that is broke!!!! What could possible go wrong
Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
donald trump has downs
“Humanism means that the man is the measure of all things...But it is not only that man must start from himself in the area of knowledge and learning, but any value system must come arbitrarily from man himself by arbitrary choice.” - Francis A. Schaeffer
“Humanism means that the man is the measure of all things...But it is not only that man must start from himself in the area of knowledge and learning, but any value system must come arbitrarily from man himself by arbitrary choice.” - Francis A. Schaeffer
Well on nursing if men only make up 7 percent of the force yet 45 percent of one of the highest paying fields in nursing is men (couldn't find the numbers on what percent of men total it is in that field) coupled with the average of men working more hours and apparently these things don't take into consideration 30 hours is full time and that if more men work 40 plus hours and a chunk of women work 30 hours (still FTYR) then yes that would help explain the difference.
I am not going to pretend that there is a gap of 0. But without getting into specific fields in nursing/teaching and the like then averaging it on hours-earned wages then figuring out what the average 40 hour week earned, I don't think it is as unlikely as you think.
Small anecdotal example, I asked a friend of mine about this anesthesiology field I read about. She works as a nurse at University of Louisville hospital, she typically works 32-32-42 hours per week cycles. The people in the anesthesiology field work significantly more, because there are less of them available. Yet as a whole nursing of all fields get lumped together.
Once again not saying that it explains any and all specific examples, and maybe not all 20 percent, but I would believe that it covers a fair bit.
Also not directed to Wells here, but people pay attention to Donald Trump?
This bill is nothing new, it has been going around for a while and keeps getting shut down. Probably because it's a waste of time for a problem that doesn't even exist, especially not the way it's portrayed in the media and such. The government already knows about this and the people pushing this shit just want votes from the professional victims.
http://www.consad.com/content/report...l%20Report.pdf
And here are some reasons why this type of bill is terrible and why it will cause more problems than it fixes (none):
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/op...22Sommers.html
http://www.forbes.com/sites/docket/2...-anything-but/
Boggles my mind that the professional victims pick this kind of stuff up and run with it as some kind of institutionalized sexism; completely ignoring the fact that we are a sexually dimorphic species, different genders make different choices.