fucking crazy bitch
fucking crazy bitch
That's not what I meant. Yeah, sure she shouldn't be treated as if she had stomped his face in. She should be treated the same way she would if she was a he, and he (the 16 year old boy) was a she. That's all, really. I'm just saying that just because she didn't manage to leave him battered and bruised back then, doesn't mean she should get off without issues. She should still be punished the way a male would be if they assaulted someone and THEN even lied about it and turned the story around.
- - - Updated - - -
So.. your brother was Superman? Because that's bullshit, really. Try talking to him and kick his shin at full force. Chances are he'll be in pain, even if he won't show it to keep up this guise of "big strong man" that was created by society.
all i'm saying is that her punishment seems fine, considering that the guy wasn't even hurt. if she really beat the shit out of him, then it'd be too light. also, if she wasn't charged with assault on a minor then she should be.
Only manlets lose in fights against women. That is why nobody gives a shit if they see something like this. If you're a real man, you should be capable enough to defend yourself against a women.
Nobody is going to show sympathy for genetically inferior males. That is the way we are hardwired as humans.
Stop butchering the word "bitch." The bitch here is the manlet and not the women.fucking crazy bitch
Women that fly off the handle at every little perceived wrong are, indeed, bitches. Stop trying to make masculine everything that doesn't need to be.
also, a skinny 16 yo vs a chubby adult? Yeah that's fair. Thats like me picking on an elementary student, and then blaming the student for being beat up.
Last edited by Crissi; 2014-06-09 at 09:49 AM.
Don't forget that she also lied about the story. She turned the roles around and made him the aggressor. The only reason that was overturned is because he had incontrovertible camera evidence. Imagine if he didn't? The police would have probably believed her. And imagine what the reaction would have been then? He'd be screwed.
So that should count too, her blatant lie.
And really. When about punishment, it should just be blind to sex or skin-colour. It should just be a standard that only shifts when there are certain circumstances. Those circumstances aren't "but my god it's a girl and we can't do that to her, she deserves better even though she cut off her husband's genitals!". Really, it should be neutral regarding sex or skin-colour. The fact that it's not is just.. y'know. Kind of sad.
Yeah. Doesn't even realize that it's sexist to both sides. If he didn't care about being sexist to men, I'm sure he would about being so to women, as he's treating women like shit by being sexist to them.. which is -- a manlet thing, no?
It relegates men to the eternal role of the aggressor and women to the role of victims. Neither men (except perhaps some macho boys) nor females (except perhaps some who can benefit from it) like that. Both want to be treated with respect. You do that through equal opportunity and equal punishment for the same crimes. Not handling women with kid gloves and saying she's too prissy and fragile to deal with the punishment. Lesson taught, Mr. Machohands. Do you even lift.. women's rights?