Let me call you a liar, okay? You can prove me wrong by pointing to this putative evidence with more than a "dig around a bit".
Oh, and I'm going to want evidence that pictures are CLASSIFIED, not that NASA just hasn't released them. Very different things!
And I remind you that you stated "pictures of the [far] side are classified". Not SOME pictures -- pictures in general. That is demonstrably false:
Last edited by Osmeric; 2014-07-25 at 06:35 PM.
"There is a pervasive myth that making content hard will induce players to rise to the occasion. We find the opposite. " -- Ghostcrawler
"The bit about hardcore players not always caring about the long term interests of the game is spot on." -- Ghostcrawler
"Do you want a game with no casuals so about 500 players?"
Because people are arguing about this for some reason. Here is one of, if not the most highly detailed real-color images of the entire Lunar surface.
http://laps.noaa.gov/albers/sos/moon...lor_brim16.jpg
That links directly to the Lunar map hosted by NOAA - The National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration who are the people who track and categorize oceanic and weather phenomena: hurricanes, tornadoes, tsunamis, and such. The image is a massive 8k resolution. Pretty friggin detailed. Can we stop arguing about what the far side of the moon looks like now?
Please show me the evidence that would refute the reasonable inference that you are insane.
- - - Updated - - -
You said "picture of the [far] side are still classified". Not "some" pictures, but pictures as a category.
In english, when we make a simple present tense statement like "Dogs are mammals", the statement is treated as universally quantified, with an implicit "all".
http://www.ehow.com/facts_7317901_ca...tatement_.html
Last edited by Osmeric; 2014-07-25 at 07:12 PM.
"There is a pervasive myth that making content hard will induce players to rise to the occasion. We find the opposite. " -- Ghostcrawler
"The bit about hardcore players not always caring about the long term interests of the game is spot on." -- Ghostcrawler
"Do you want a game with no casuals so about 500 players?"
Actually, this.
Bringing an asteroid back to the moon and deliberately throwing it into the surface (if a way that most of the bigger bits would stay rather than bouncing off) would be pretty viable (if a little extreme). We move mining operations in and they have a fairly viable amount of gravity to work with (much easier than space). Eventually building a "space dock" in lunar orbit, bring down a few more asteroids and building ships would get a reasonable bit easier.
Originally Posted by BoubouilleOriginally Posted by xxAkirhaxx
Human progress isn't measured by industry. It's measured by the value you place on a life.
Just, be kind.
Just because you don't believe it, doesn't mean everyone shares your same view. I have been researching this kind of thing for years because it fascinates me. There are a plethora of websites and resources out there with all kinds of information related to this phenomenon. Not just the oddball conspiracy websites either. There are a lot of high quality well-written and well-researched documents floating around. Perhaps if you open your mind and spend a little while reading through it, you may start to see some pretty compelling evidence. Or at least you can admit to the fact that it's not out of the realm of possibility.
It's a must if we ever want to get off this rock. Establishing a colony on the moon is the first step to spreading through the solar system and then the galaxy.
Putin khuliyo
Just not any that you can link to. Convenient, that.
Most likely, you are either lying outright, or your "evidence" is BS bouncing around the fringe internet echo chamber, and you don't want to link it because deep down you realize how absurd it is to call that "evidence".
"There is a pervasive myth that making content hard will induce players to rise to the occasion. We find the opposite. " -- Ghostcrawler
"The bit about hardcore players not always caring about the long term interests of the game is spot on." -- Ghostcrawler
"Do you want a game with no casuals so about 500 players?"
Every time I come around this topic, I think about this:
All you have to do convince America that there is a cost effective oil supply on Pluto. Then you just sit back and watch the Freedom Train roll out.
Once 'Murica takes to the stars, China and Russia will follow just so as to not be outdone by we filthy Americans.
Japan will come along also, because they have a Napoleon complex.
"There is a pervasive myth that making content hard will induce players to rise to the occasion. We find the opposite. " -- Ghostcrawler
"The bit about hardcore players not always caring about the long term interests of the game is spot on." -- Ghostcrawler
"Do you want a game with no casuals so about 500 players?"