I don't really understand why it's 2 and half weeks delay between launch and raids, imo 1 week delay we had in mop felt good enough.
I don't really understand why it's 2 and half weeks delay between launch and raids, imo 1 week delay we had in mop felt good enough.
Ok, so, let me get this straight: people are surprised and upset about the final boss of an ocr-themed expansion being an orc? hmmmkay.
Goes against the whole ability pruning idea.Warlords will have more activated trinkets compared to Mists of Pandaria.
Very simple: Don't make neon color dyes... Sometimes the excuses Blizzard gives are so stupid...Players coming into the game shouldn't see everyone wearing crazy neon colors or something like that.
Well it is somewhat surprising seeing as how this panda/chinese themed expansion's final boss was an orc. It shows that Blizzard can have a completely different final boss from the initial theme and could all work out. Also, not using Grom would be in line with their earlier statement that the final boss of WoD wouldn't be an orc. However, it seems that yet another internal problem arose in Blizz and they changed it to Grom. Shame really.
"Don't unsub or we'll give you a price raise"
Quality strong arm tactics you got there Blizzard, getting a wee bit desperate lately?
1£ more?! Holy crap, might have to stop playing.
Seriously, it's wierd the price raize hasn't come until now.
Anyone noticed the lack of dragons in this expansion? lol
And that happened in Warcraft 3. That cinematic was set before Warcraft 1, which is approx 20-25 years BEFORE Warcraft 3. C'mon it says 35 years ago in the cinematic! Know your lore people! I don't understand why people keep confusing those events. It's not even remotely similar to what happened in Warcraft 3. The Orcs arn't even the same colour!
Killing Grom, even in the past wouldn't fix anything. Y'know, because they've already not drunk the blood, Garrosh wasn't there, they didn't have Iron Horde technology and plenty of other stuff that didn't ever happen. The orcs arn't even attempting to invade for the first war, they're attemping to invade NOW. Killing Grom in the past would just further pollute the timeline, as there would be a man dead who was alive before.
Everyone raging about no new content and still paying sub fees is amazing to me. Blizzard really has done something truly amazing, synthesized virtual crack that has a physical effect.
Their restricting view on transmog is really disappointing.
All the ones insulting others who are annoyed about the price change should pay me 1 £ every month. $_$
I would be happy if every WoW subscriber would give me a £ once. C'mon, it's only one pound, it won't kill you... :P
While I understand that wages and other cost rise so the subs need to rise at some point too I would like to see prove if its really needed or just greed. They can easily claim that the increase is needed even when it's not. Seeing the ingame shop, my bet is on greed.
Yeah, I think this is something people need to really come to grips with. 5 and 10 levels are arbitrary numbers. The real numbers come from the amount of XP needed to achieve a level along with the amount of XP given per accomplishment (harvesting, questing, killing mobs, exploration, etc.) If the 5 levels need a total of 5 million XP, but you're only getting an average of 500 XP per accomplishment while 10 levels need a total of 10 million XP and you're getting 2,000 XP per accomplishment, it's going to take longer to attain that 5 level goal as opposed to the 10 level.
So the claims that 10 levels automatically means longer leveling than 5 is dumb.
No, it's a damn stupid argument. Being able to afford it doesn't make an 11% increase in price justified. We're receiving no more content than we used to, the cost of running the servers has done nothing but fall since the game was initially released and the value of the Pound is higher than its been for nearly 6 years.
I could easily afford to pay £100 per month to play WoW. If they increased the sub that high would you still be parroting this nonsense?