Article: http://gothamist.com/2014/10/28/woma...or_10_hour.php
Video:
So...
This person goes out and walks through NYC for 10 hours. Her friend walks a few paces ahead of her with a backpack on, and a camera hidden in the backpack which is constantly recording. Over 100 instances of street harassment took place, not including winks, whistles, etc.
I'm going to get the "Some of these aren't even harassment!" stuff out of the way right at the start. Yes, we all have different definitions of harassment. Some of you may not consider things like "smile, beautiful" or "Hey gorgeous" as harassment while other people would. I get that and no one is going to change anyone's mind on it, however there are a bunch of things in there that constitute street harassment by most people's definition. Also please try to consider that, even if you don't consider one person shouting "Hey sexy!" after you as you walk by to be harassment, or telling you to smile or whatever, these things don't happen in a vacuum. I think it's difficult to understand the cumulative impact of what's happening from the other person's perspective, because like, you just said one small thing and they "totally ignored me! how rude!" - but if you can't go out for an hour without 10 people trying to stop you in the street, it starts to add up, you know? One thing like "Hey beautiful" may not seem much like a big deal, but if two minutes ago someone else said "Somebody's acknowledging you for being beautiful—you should say thank you!" then what you've said takes on a different tone. Will talk a bit more about this in a moment.
Anyway, let's take a proper look at this. So, the article is pretty... Well, I realise that it's tackling male -> female street harassment, but it comes off a bit too much like "Men never understand this because they are always the ones doing the harassing!" which I don't really think is fair, women can be just as bad, although it probably happens with more frequency to women than from them (I'm sure there is evidence to support this but I'm just going to assume it's true and not bother checking - if someone wants to correct me on this, please do!) so in terms of this cumulative weight that the video, I feel, is trying to highlight, it's probably more relevant to this side of the discussion.
Now, this whole issue of the cumulative impact of harassment... Like I said earlier, it's important - I think, to realise that what you're saying isn't said in a vacuum. I mean, we are pretty aware of this in other aspects of our life, like, if you're at work and you go out on your lunch break to the shop down the road to get a sandwich. If someone from greenpeace stops you and tries to talk to you and you don't have time, you might be like "sorry I can't right now" and that's cool and we just sort of forget about it. On the other hand, if while you are out for your hour lunch break, 10 people (Taking 100+ people in 1 hours, divide that down to 10 people in 1 hour) tried to stop you to donate to charity, maybe one is greenpeace, one is friends of the earth, one is oxfam, one is guide dogs for the blind, one is british red cross, one is Médecins Sans Frontières, etc etc etc, almost anyone would start to get pissy about it. Now imagine that happened every day for 10 days straight. Even though none of them may be doing anything "over the line" it would still probably bother most people. But what if some of them DID do something that crossed the line. In the UK charity people aren't allowed to follow you for more than 2 or 3 steps, by law, I believe. What if one of them followed you for 5 minutes talking at you while you were totally silent, trying to get you to donate. The next one might do nothing wrong, but your view of them is going to be tainted by it. I think people sort of forget this when it comes to talking at other people in the street trying to flirt with them or attract their attention. I'm not sure if it's fair to hold someone in a bad light because of something someone else said a few minutes ago, but it's quite difficult to not be at least bothered by it, you know?
So, what do you think?