Could you have kids with someone of another race?

[Kurioxan]

Yeah that's by definition discriminating based on race, not to mention that you said explicitly you dislike dark skin and general facial features (not actually sure what this means).

Not really, i dislike tanned white women as well, if its too much. I just dont like dark skin, little to do with race.
Facial features is... kind of self-explanatory? every ethnicity has specific cranial shapes, you can tell where someone is from/what race that person is by looking at their skull or facial features. I have seen some black women who didnt have specific racial shapes, which whom i was fine with but still dont like dark skin.

Also, racism is inherent to humans, or better yet, xenophobia.
As long as you dont harm anyone with it, there is nothing inherently wrong with it, especially regarding sexual and reproductive freedom.

[Doctor Amadeus]

Women not selling me a donut because my skin color is a racist, not selling me the donut because I'm not good enough racism. A women not wanting to have kids with me because of my race is possibly racist not racism.

[grexly75]

Yes, I know I would.. One of the main reasons is that you need to have genetic diversity for some species to survive.. And humans as such need that diversity, in order to continue its existence..

[Kraenen]

Perhaps, but the same could be said if eye color. The reason it isn't is because racist never choose it as defining much if anythink. Skin color is another matter. Both can be a preference and nothing else attached to it other than that person doesn't find that skin color attractive.

In a way I'll concede a bit of a point to you. Race is a built up construct anyway, which extends past just skin colour into things like IQ or physical size or personality - and into inherent differences. So in that way, just disliking skin colour is merely disliking skin colour. Just like you are discriminating based on eye colour. I mean I do the same, I won't pretend I'm above all this, but the morality of it is a different question altogether. That said, I'd be suspicious of someone who says they're just not attracted to black people and that it's not racist.

As others have mentioned I doubt anyone can't find a single person of a different race they find attractive.

[Eats Compost]

Women not selling me a donut because my skin color is a racist, not selling me the donut because I'm not good enough racism. A women not wanting to have kids with me because of my race is possibly racist not racism.

racist
[rey-sist]

noun
1.
a person who believes in racism, the doctrine that one's own racial group is superior or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others.
adjective
2.
of or like racists or racism

"Racism" and "racist" don't have some kind of divide between their definitions. Something can't be racist but not an example of racism, which is why that line of argument is just bizarre. If we conclude that the their reason for not having kids with a person is racist, then it's racism. If we conclude that their reason is not racist, then it's not racism.

[Doctor Amadeus]

Not really, i dislike tanned white women as well, if its too much. I just dont like dark skin, little to do with race.
Facial features is... kind of self-explanatory? every ethnicity has specific cranial shapes, you can tell where someone is from/what race that person is by looking at their skull or facial features. I have seen some black women who didnt have specific racial shapes, which whom i was fine with but still dont like dark skin.

Also, racism is inherent to humans, or better yet, xenophobia.
As long as you dont harm anyone with it, there is nothing inherently wrong with it, especially regarding sexual and reproductive freedom.

Now you're just flat out spewing propaganda. Cranial head suez and features much like skin tone or eye color have fuck all to do with anything skin color.

Plenty of people like exotic more. It's just preference.

[Aphrel]

Refering to humans with diffrent skincolor as another race. Is very racist imo. And worse, very unscientific. There is only one human race.
Now if we change the question to something more specific, scientific and less racist like.
"Whould you wanna have sex with some1 that has a different skincolor then you?"

My answer whould be the same as if some1 asked me if id fuck any1 girl. Yes if i find her attractive, no if i dont. Its as simple as that. I know of several celibritys of diffrent skincolor then mine that is incredibly good looking. and i know of some white girls that i whuldnt touch with gloves.

[Jester Joe]

if you found someone attractive but refused to because of their race, what other reason would there be?

Well. What would be the point of the question if you're not including attraction? Of course biologically you can.

[Deleted]

Ofc. Why dafuq not?

[Vea Lea]

Well. What would be the point of the question if you're not including attraction? Of course biologically you can.

how can you find all the individuals of another race not attractive?

[Kraenen]

Not really, i dislike tanned white women as well, if its too much. I just dont like dark skin, little to do with race.
Facial features is... kind of self-explanatory? every ethnicity has specific cranial shapes, you can tell where someone is from/what race that person is by looking at their skull or facial features. I have seen some black women who didnt have specific racial shapes, which whom i was fine with but still dont like dark skin.

Also, racism is inherent to humans, or better yet, xenophobia.
As long as you dont harm anyone with it, there is nothing inherently wrong with it, especially regarding sexual and reproductive freedom.

I just don't agree with those who say since it's your sexual attraction it's therefore not wrong or that it's not discriminatory.

Aren't those facial/skull features based on old old pseudoscientific anthropology (or scientific racism)?

[Doctor Amadeus]

racist
[rey-sist]

noun
1.
a person who believes in racism, the doctrine that one's own racial group is superior or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others.
adjective
2.
of or like racists or racism

"Racism" and "racist" don't have some kind of divide between their definitions. Something can't be racist but not an example of racism, which is why that line of argument is just bizarre.

No I described them as you just put being racist by itself is nothing to do with racism until you act. And by not acting meaning having kids with someone of a race you are not engaging in racism.

[Kraenen]

Now you're just flat out spewing propaganda. Cranial head suez and features much like skin tone or eye color have fuck all to do with anything skin color.

Plenty of people like exotic more. It's just preference.

See I just don't get why it being "just a preference" makes it not racism anymore.

[THE Bigzoman]

How is it possible to find every single person of a particular race unattractive?

Maybe not every single one.

But I don't like dark skinned girls unless their features are porn star status.

[rayden54]

Yeah, in that specific situation, it is racism or cultural pressure.
But the thing is, so what?

Depends mostly on your motives. Race by itself is a social construct. Someone of a different race than you is likely going to be from a different cultural background as well. Unfortunately for Dr. Seuss, real racism isn't as simple as with the star-bellied Sneetches.

I just don't agree with those who say since it's your sexual attraction it's therefore not wrong or that it's not discriminatory.

Aren't those facial/skull features based on old old pseudoscientific anthropology (or scientific racism)?

You don't seem to understand that "sexual preferences" are not voluntary things. For the same reason that not everyone is bisexual, not everyone is going to be attracted to every race.

(Unless you actually think that every straight person is homophobic and every gay person is hetrophobic that is)

[THE Bigzoman]

I just don't agree with those who say since it's your sexual attraction it's therefore not wrong or that it's not discriminatory.

Aren't those facial/skull features based on old old pseudoscientific anthropology (or scientific racism)?

It not wrong, it's a matter of preference.

A lot of things are discriminatory. I grab a red popsicle instead of a blue one cause I like watermelon.

There, I just engaged in discrimination. Who does someones personal attraction harm?

[derpkitteh]

not wanting to have a child with someone of a different race does not have to be racism. it can be because of racism, but not always. it's not inherently racist or racism in anyway, it's a fucking preference.

[Easo]

Yeah, since I find other "races" attractive.

[Doctor Amadeus]

In a way I'll concede a bit of a point to you. Race is a built up construct anyway, which extends past just skin colour into things like IQ or physical size or personality - and into inherent differences. So in that way, just disliking skin colour is merely disliking skin colour. Just like you are discriminating based on eye colour. I mean I do the same, I won't pretend I'm above all this, but the morality of it is a different question altogether. That said, I'd be suspicious of someone who says they're just not attracted to black people and that it's not racist.

As others have mentioned I doubt anyone can't find a single person of a different race they find attractive.

Yeah but the question is asking about having kids.

[Eats Compost]

No I described them as you just put being racist by itself is nothing to do with racism until you act. And by not acting meaning having kids with someone of a race you are not engaging in racism.

The only thing dividing "racist" and "racism" is that one is an adjective and one is a noun. To claim that an act can be racist in motive but not an act of racism is preposterous, because it must be racism by definition.