Not disagreeing. I only point out that the "cost of doing business" for the GOP is to sacrifice its national aspirations for local primaries. To win local office in conservative districts, a politician basically has to placate a majority of white people. To win a nation-wide election, however, requires a much more diverse coalition.
This isn't 1984 anymore. You can't win 70% of the white vote, neglect or turn off everyone else, and simultaneously win the largest electoral college victory in American history. Ask Not-President Mitt Romney how far 70% of the white vote and no one else got him.
Yup, and its left wanting because he can only understand religiosity as expressing itself in GOP values. There's a reason Francis has been so popular. Catholics might trend against the Democrats on abortion and, to an extent, on gay rights, but they're big on a lot of things the GOP hates.
And yet the left constantly attempts to do the same such as forcing their definition of the confederate flag onto people, saying it represents racism, when a lot of people define it as state's rights. And maybe you disagree with that analogy, but a lot of people think that analogy has a ton of merit, and so when you then force your opinions of flags onto everyone but say we cant force our opinions of marriage on everyone, they start pulling the republican lever in the voting booth because they think you're full of crap. They think you believe its perfectly ok to force your opinions ONLY when you agree with them.
Or to put it another way, people see that the left forces their opinions on:
1. the confederate flag
2. school lunch menus
3. christmas
4. the banning of religion
5. health care
6. where parents are allowed to send their kids to school
7. the maximum allowed size of a soda
and a ton of other things. And then they get told oh NO you can't force your opinion on anything because forcing opinions is wrong, they think you are nuts!
Last edited by Grummgug; 2015-09-28 at 04:07 AM.
An overwhelming majority of them are, yes. When 89% of a party is drawn from one group, that group will easily define the political identity of the party.
What I like or prefer is immaterial. What concerns me is reality.Sounds like you just like the white vs brown politics.
Last edited by Slybak; 2015-09-28 at 04:08 AM.
That's a racist oversimplification right there. There's plenty of non-white cultures that engage in hard right religious zealotry and for that they always vote for the right wingers. Not to mention no matter how much the right claims to be against immigration it's just a fucking ruse. More immigration = less competition for jobs = lower wages. Why the fuck would the rich be against that? Hint: They aren't.
^ On the topic of liberal censorship, right here in Canada I was driving home from a family potluck and there was a bigass pickup truck parked on the side of the road with a confederate flag flying out of either window. And I was like "Fuck yeah."
I myself lean to the left on pretty much all domestic issues... But people who think they should have the right to censor everything they don't agree with need to go fuck off and die. Hence it made me smile.... it made me grin..
Yes everyone knows that. The point is that Democrats don't actually do anything to help minorities once they get in office. Which is why we will likely see Hillary for 4 years and if the economy is doing good then great, if not that support for Democrats will go down after a decade+ of being in office.
That's not a record. In 2000, those same nonwhite millennials leaned 32% right. The current 23% right from the same population group is less than 32%.
The right loses a bigger portion with the silent generation dying. 53% of the white population in the US that's 70+ years old plus 21% of the nonwhite portion is much greater than 70% of the nonwhite portion + 37% of the white portion of the same age.
Because I'm not sure you understand the math here.