Republican Election 2016 - Donald Trump Megathread [OFFICIAL]

[Zan15]

lol drain that swamp....

oops, 5 former congressmen already part of the plan.


damn hillary and her pay to play.

oops,Stephen Bannon billionaire donator and supporter.
Peter Thiel another huge giver.
Rebekah Mercer, the daughter of hedge-fund nillionaire and Republican mega-donor Robert Mercer
AG of Florida Pam Bondi, who dismissed his investigation after he gave to her...now its payback time




not looking good so far.

on top of the things he's already flipped on promising

total aca repeal
sending hillary to jail
not touching medicare
wall being kinda sorta scaled down, THE WALL JUST GOT 10 FEET LOWER.


lol, not even Jan yet.

[JadedTauren]

Ya - and Trump is NEVER going to be President and I am the one who is delusional for emphatically stating, over and over, that he would crush her in the GE. LOL

He is going to drain the swamp and lock up Hillary (unless that slippery little bitch gets away again.)

- - - Updated - - -



That was probably my most favorite part of the campaign,watching the main stream media (and others) stomp their feet like little children DEMANDING that Trump release his taxes - and he never did. Instead, he basically lifted his middle finger and said "Fuck You" - and he crushed Hillary in doing so. LOL

If he's draining the swamp why is he giving out positions to special interest lobbyists and his own children?

[Zandalarian Paladin]

Seeing how things go, I'm still warry of speaking too quickly, but seeing how he speaks, his plans and where he's going, seems like he's going to be marginally more moderate than expected.

That's even more amazing.

[Elegiac]

Seeing how things go, I'm still warry of speaking too quickly, but seeing how he speaks, his plans and where he's going, seems like he's going to be marginally more moderate than expected.

That's even more amazing.

I'm not sure what part of Republican 'moderation' is amazing, exactly.

[Masark]

If he's draining the swamp why is he giving out positions to special interest lobbyists and his own children?

He's draining the swamp, digging it 10 feet deeper, then refilling it.

[Zandalarian Paladin]

I'm not sure what part of Republican 'moderation' is amazing, exactly.

I'm sorry you can't be sure about what's amazing about that.

[Zecora]

you will when you no longer have a job, homeless because the world economy has crashed and your out on the street begging for food.

I've got enough money put by to last me a few years, I grow quite a bit of my own food and my job is not one that's likely be cut this side of the apocalypse. So bring it on!

[Elegiac]

I'm sorry you can't be sure about what's amazing about that.

Largely because Republican 'moderation' only benefits rich white people. This has been the case for the past half century, I'm not sure why you'd think it'd be any different under a demagogue surrounded by establishment hacks.

[Bullettime]

Largely because Republican 'moderation' only benefits rich white people. This has been the case for the past half century, I'm not sure why you'd think it'd be any different under a demagogue surrounded by establishment hacks.

Meanwhile Kansas and Louisiana, live experiments for near unregulated trickle down, are going to shit so fast that people are in a panic.

(in agreement, not arguing)

[Zandalarian Paladin]

Largely because Republican 'moderation' only benefits rich white people. This has been the case for the past half century, I'm not sure why you'd think it'd be any different under a demagogue surrounded by establishment hacks.

Well you wanted Hillary in, so I'm not so sure to what extent your argument is valid.

[Elegiac]

Well you wanted Hillary in, so I'm not so sure to what extent your argument is valid.

Because she is not a demagogue and equally as importantly, not a Republicans. Democrats have a better track record of social and economic policy.

[Zandalarian Paladin]

Because she is not a demagogue and equally as importantly, not a Republicans. Democrats have a better track record of social and economic policy.

Obama* has. But then again, Obama was ethical.

[Nanaboostme]

My favorite tweet from Trump.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...rc=twsrc%5Etfw

[Invrlose]

If you were in contact with reality you'd realize that this will have negligible effect on the election. Its too minor and there is no smoking gun. Moreover voters perceptions are already baked in, and very few voters remain undecided. From early voting data its easily going to be a 300+ electoral vote win for Clinton. Right now she is leading by 15% among early voters, if that continues its a democratic landslide and democrats will hold all branches of government. So I have to say from the bottom of my heart, thank you, really truly thank you. Without you Trumpists and your nutjob candidate we could never have done it.

Boy you were wrong.

[Stop Pretending]

If you were in contact with reality you'd realize that this will have negligible effect on the election. Its too minor and there is no smoking gun. Moreover voters perceptions are already baked in, and very few voters remain undecided. From early voting data its easily going to be a 300+ electoral vote win for Clinton. Right now she is leading by 15% among early voters, if that continues its a democratic landslide and democrats will hold all branches of government. So I have to say from the bottom of my heart, thank you, really truly thank you. Without you Trumpists and your nutjob candidate we could never have done it.

About your comment.

[alexw]

Boy you were wrong.

Yup I was wrong. I believed the polls and that the Obama coalition would turn out for Clinton. They didn't. I believed that Trump being the nutjob he is would be enough to turn them out, instead democratic voter totals dropped 5 million relative to 2012. Trump didn't get them they just stayed home.

But the first bit is correct. Voters perceptions were baked in. Lots of Obama voters were not going to vote for Clinton the polls just didn't capture that.

[PC2]

Just finished Sargon's saltmining vid. The Laci Green part was satisfying.

[zenkai]

California history teacher placed on leave after comparing Trump to Hitler


It's people like her the cost Hillary the election, any sane person knows this is bullshit. How can you take anyone seriously who talks like this?

[Instrument]

Yup I was wrong. I believed the polls and that the Obama coalition would turn out for Clinton. They didn't. I believed that Trump being the nutjob he is would be enough to turn them out, instead democratic voter totals dropped 5 million relative to 2012. Trump didn't get them they just stayed home.

But the first bit is correct. Voters perceptions were baked in. Lots of Obama voters were not going to vote for Clinton the polls just didn't capture that.

even in defeat you can't accept the fact that all of the statement was wrong

[Cerilis]

California history teacher placed on leave after comparing Trump to Hitler


It's people like her the cost Hillary the election, any sane person knows this is bullshit. How can you take anyone seriously who talks like this?

Uhm, I'm not saying that I "agree" with him and I also dont see his "facts" (neither do you, at least from that article), but "any sane person knows this is bullshit" is not exactly a well-founded challenge of a comparison.
I mean, without even seeing the facts, how can anyone say it's bullshit. And comparing someone with someone else is not exactly saying "xy is literally Hitler", too. If he just shows similarities, which might not be wrong but really based on facts (again: we can't see that just from the article though), why would there be a reason to fire him?