Muslim Teacher SUES School Over 9/11 Film

[CMartel]

Muslim Teacher SUES School Over 9/11 Film ByPamela Geller on September 25, 2016 - See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2016/09/musl....A723KqAh.dpuf

Mind you, this is only 15 years after 9/11. Considering how fast Western elites are caving and submitting to Islamic demands, how many more years do you think it will take before all mention of Allah, jihad and Islam are scrubbed from 9/11 histories? Five? Ten at most.

The last martyrdom letters of the 9/11 jihadis invoked Allah over 90 times — how many people are aware of that salient fact?


Muslim teacher is suing a school for ‘race discrimination’ after she was sacked for objecting to a video of 9/11 being shown to 11-year-olds
Suriyah Bi was assisting the class at Heartlands Academy in Birmingham
The pupils were shown the horrifying video which was rated for over-18s
Ms Bi said the clip was inappropriate as it could distress the youngsters
She claims she was dismissed after expressing concerns to headteacher

By Alex Matthews For Mailonline, 25 September 2016:

Muslim teacher is suing a school for ‘race discrimination’ after she was sacked for objecting to a video of 9/11 being shown to 11-year-olds

Suriyah Bi was assisting the class at Heartlands Academy in Birmingham
The pupils were shown the horrifying video which was rated for over-18s
Ms Bi said the clip was inappropriate as it could distress the youngsters
She claims she was dismissed after expressing concerns to headteacher

By Alex Matthews For Mailonline

Teaching assistant Suriyah Bi claims she was sacked for objecting to children being shown a clip of the 9/11 attacks
+4

Teaching assistant Suriyah Bi claims she was sacked for objecting to children being shown a clip of the 9/11 attacks

A Muslim teacher is taking legal action against a school over claims she was sacked for objecting to children being shown a video of the 9/11 terror attacks.

Suriyah Bi, 24, lost her job at Heartlands Academy in Birmingham, after just a week of being a teaching assistant in a year seven class there.

She claims that she was shown the door after she complained it was not appropriate for the 11 and 12-year-olds in her class to watch the ‘X-rated’ clip – that showed the horrors of the attacks on World Trade Center in New York, in September 2001.

Ms Bi, an Oxford University Graduate, from Yardley in Birmingham, is now pursuing claims against the school for unfair dismissal and religious discrimination.

The video was not mentioned in detail during the brief preliminary hearing which dealt with technical and legal matters.

But outside the hearing, Ms Bi said: ‘It was shown to some 30 children during class. I understand the video was shown without the permission of the authorities.

‘It raised questions about what safeguards there are in schools to protect children.

‘These were children aged 11, of whom many knew little, or nothing, about the 9/11 horror.

‘They were subjected to graphic scenes and some were shocked and upset. The video not only showed the plane crashing into the Twin Towers but also showed people committing suicide by jumping to their deaths from the tower blocks.

‘Such young children should not been shown things like that because it is well-known that it can play on their minds and even induce them to kill themselves.




bi-teacher-911



Ms Bi, an Oxford University Graduate, from Yardley in Birmingham, is now pursuing claims against Heartlands Academy for unfair dismissal and religious discrimination




Ms Bi said footage of the 9/11 attacks was too upsetting to show the year 7 class she was helping at Heartlands (stock picture of the tragic incident)


Ms Bi said footage of the 9/11 attacks was too upsetting to show the year 7 class she was helping at Heartlands (stock picture of the tragic incident)

‘I was in the classroom when the video was shown and I quickly objected. Later, I was told to leave the school.

‘There was an investigation into the matter but I was dismissed for making a whistle blowing complaint.’

Ms Bi said she believed no action was taken against the teacher who screened the video, but some people regarded the showing as ‘misguided’.

The class had been studying a poem called Out of the Blue, by Simon Armitage, about a victim of the 9/11 terrorist attack. The poem is part of the AQA GCSE syllabus.



E-Act, who run the Heartlands Academy, told the tribunal judge Ron Broughton that the teacher left because she no longer wanted to work for themE-Act, who run the Heartlands Academy, told the tribunal judge Ron Broughton that the teacher left because she no longer wanted to work for them

E-Act, who run the academy, told the tribunal judge Ron Broughton that the teacher no longer wanted to work for them.

They complained there had been no need for the preliminary hearing and were considering making a claim for costs against Suriyah for causing delays.

Mr Broughton said she could go ahead with her legal claims at a full hearing later this year and he would not consider a claim for costs at this stage.
- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2016/09/musl....A723KqAh.dpuf

[Azadina]

The only place I know of, where you can sue for whatever stupid reasons, and completely absurd amounts. The great freedomland.

I know it's a strange concept to some, but sometimes having some regulations won't hurt.

[Breccia]

Considering how fast Western elites are caving and submitting to Islamic demands

I'd say "citation needed" but this thread is religion bashing and going to get locked.

EDIT: Locked like literally half your threads. At this point, you're asking to get banned, too. You're certainly not being taken seriously.

[zenkai]

bi-teacher-911

Uh, what? I Think you need to edit your post and just not copy and paste everything.

[Ealyssa]

Nice narrative going on in your head OP.

[Kalis]

The only place I know of, where you can sue for whatever stupid reasons, and completely absurd amounts. The great freedomland.

I know it's a strange concept to some, but sometimes having some regulations won't hurt.

This is Birmingham, England. Not sure Birmingham has ever been described as 'The great freedomland', it has been called 'The great shithole' once or twice.

[Belize]

Holy crapples, edit your post a little bit after copy an pasting.

Also, half of the article is nonsensical ranting.

[Deleted]

I agree with the teacher. Showing 9/11 footage to 11 year olds is stretching it quite far.

[Azadina]

This is Birmingham, England. Not sure Birmingham has ever been described as 'The great freedomland', it has been called 'The great shithole' once or twice.

Oh, it was? I only read halfway or so of the rambling

I agree with the teacher. Showing 9/11 footage to 11 year olds is stretching it quite far.

How's that any different from me personally having watched it happen on live TV back when it did?

[Reg]

While I agree with the teacher that showing the footage to 11 year olds is not a good idea, I don't think her firing was due to racial discrimination unless there is more to the story.

[Kalis]

While I agree with the teacher that showing the footage to 11 year olds is not a good idea, I don't think her firing was due to racial discrimination unless there is more to the story.

I can see the justification in her refusing the show an 18-rated video clip to 11 year olds, the religious discrimination claim is likely an attempt to throw a load of shit in the hope that some sticks and will probably be dismissed or dropped, basically a negotiation tactic.

[Jotaux]

If she was let go for objecting to showing the video that was clearly not suitable for children then I think its a valid law suit. For a movie like that don't you need parent's permission?

[Garnier Fructis]

Given that this is a CMartel thread, anyone mind giving me the reality instead of the almost guaranteed bullshit narrative in the OP?

[Mystrome]

How's that any different from me personally having watched it happen on live TV back when it did?

It's different in the sense that it was your (family's) choice to (let you) watch. When it's part of class the 'choice' option is gone.

Not saying it's bad that you did or not btw.



Personally, I don't think letting young teens watch terrible things in detail is very constructive. A picture of the planes hitting the towers and/or the towers collapsing is more than enough to demonstrate what happened.

[Shinzou]

The article, especially the title, is misleading.

She didn't sue because of the film. She sued because she believes she was discriminated against when she was fired. Very different things. The article doesn't provide any evidence in opposition to her claims. Of course lack of evidence is not evidence. So she may have been fired for a justifiable reason. The article is shit and you should feel bad for treating it like journalism. Just a ranting opinion piece.

[Azadina]

If my 11 year old daughter/son were to be shown +18 vids in school I'd be suing the school to.

Can you explain to me why that footage is suddenly 18+, when it was shown on national TV across the world I would assume, to people of any age. I was 11 and watching it from TV as it happened. My sister was 10, and brother 5. We all saw it.

It's different in the sense that it was your (family's) choice to (let you) watch. When it's part of class the 'choice' option is gone.

Not saying it's bad that you did or not btw.



Personally, I don't think letting young teens watch terrible things in detail is very constructive. A picture of the planes hitting the towers and/or the towers collapsing is more than enough to demonstrate what happened.

You can't just blast 18+ content during mid day to all audience. So, it obviously wasn't rated that, since it was shown live to anyone watching. Not a replay during night hours for adults only.

[Mystrome]

You can't just blast 18+ content during mid day to all audience. So, it obviously wasn't rated that, since it was shown live to anyone watching. Not a replay during night hours for adults only.

Yeah that's mostly true I suppose, though some of the 'live' stuff was definitely adult-only material.

[zenkai]

I like the click bait title. So which is it, is she suing because it's a 9/11 film or because it's an adult film showed to children?

[Azadina]

I haven't seen the video shown to those school children, so I'm in no position to comment on its certification.

Neither have I, but the picture in the link would imply it's the same footage that was on TV.

[Deleted]

18+ documentary about 9/11, really ? Did they edited hardcore porn in to it or something ?