China CAN invade the US... it will scare you with how possible this is.

[Deleted]

Oh AK-47's are nice. My buddy owns 2. That's what they'd be coming over with. No sweat.

I can assure you, Your 'buddy' would not have the same type of AK-47 as the Chinese would.

[Chronius]

This aint easy mode setting COD mate

You don't just approach a squad of trained soldiers wielding heavy weapons and expect to win just because youre fighting in your shopping strip.

Nope, you wait and make them pay for every inch they take. A sniper on every corner halts the advance.

[FearXI]

Only US does that these days it seems

Difference is China would keep it.

[Defengar]

This wouldnt happen for 10-20 years (until the chinese economy has plateaued and they no longer need money from the US) the only way for them to from further will be by gues what?... invading other nations. They will not atack their neighbors first because america would retaliate. They would attempt to cripple us to ensure success in the attacks on russia, Japan, SK, and anyone els they want. They would hit us harder later.

one million troops spear out in 5-7 american coastal cities armed with rockets, grenades, bazookas, armor piercing rounds in their automatic weapons, and wearing body armor and possibly even light tanks as support would be a nightmare. They would burn the cities and disperse before we could send in troops to kill them (airstrikes would be hazardous because there could be millions of potential civilian deaths from it)

[Pappahealar]

What the fuuuuuck is up with all these America is gonna get invaded topics. You are so gullible. It must fucking be Modern Warfare 2 and 3. Two big games where scenarios of America getting invaded and these topics pop up all over the place. God damn it. America will not get invaded any time soon. Someone considering invading USA is stupid, since you guys got by far the biggest army in the world. And if they would have Nuclear warfare their country would be bombed to space before even nothing else than New York or Washington D.C would've been blown away.

So stop with these US invaded topics please.

[FearXI]

I can assure you, Your 'buddy' would not have the same type of AK-47 as the Chinese would.

So you've seen his AK's? How could you assure me of that?

[Kuntantee]

I'm pretty sure OP watched Battle: Los Angeles

[WaitingforSWTOR]

You realize that if they actually did this, they'd probably just nuke China, right?

Lets see the scenario:

1-China nukes USA
2-USA nukes China
3-Taking the chance, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, and most Islam countries wich hate USA send their nukes, troops and hatred to USA.

Four muslims with two planes blew up the Twin Towers. Didnt you all learned anything from that? you are not immune

[Rec]

Even -if- China could invade the USA successfully, not sure it would be in their best interest.

[Begrudge]

How do you know this? The AK-47 and klashnekoff are the most reliable weapons in the world, people have used them for 60 years for a reason.

because they are accurate right? lol i was in the military in a weapons squad, i was a javelin gunner for the US army, once u use a targeting system as advanced as that u come tell me who has good weapons and i have used both of those junk ass old weapons

[Failgasm]

duno why people underestimate US so much lol
was underestimated when they got involved in ww2 but that didn't work out very well ok

[Murkantilism]

umm one nation has

If you mean the US that certainly doesn't count. They didn't start any land offensives against Japan until the war in Germany had come to an end. I don't think it counts as fighting on two fronts.

[BatteredRose]

2012 end of the world!

Our lord and savior Mr. Camping changed the date yet again?

Edit:

Even -if- China could invade the USA successfully, not sure it would be in their best interest.

And this, at least for now. Who knows what change the future will change. Sure, world peace would be nice and all, but I don't see that happening, ever.

I could go slap crying toddlers in Walmart, doesn't mean I will.

I'd like to think China has a bit more sense than that.

[Deleted]

The United States hasn't fought a war for land since the mid-1800's. In fact, every time the US has invaded another country in the last 150 years, they eventually turn over the country back to its inhabitants. Oxycotton, please meet the Republic of China (you may know it as Taiwan). They may disagree with your point.

What's your point? Your country uses ploys such as the war on terror in order to benefit itself, China may have control of Taiwan and Tibet for that matter. But they don't attack countries for their minerals.

They supported Al Queda in the 1980's.
Allowed Kuwait to be invaded and civilians massacred in the 1990's
Currently fucking up the middle-east with technology such as the internet.

America feeds of destabalizing then exploiting other countries while using such ploys as the war on terror.

[Epock]

This wouldnt happen for 10-20 years (until the chinese economy has plateaued and they no longer need money from the US) the only way for them to from further will be by gues what?... invading other nations. They will not atack their neighbors first because america would retaliate. They would attempt to cripple us to ensure success in the attacks on russia, Japan, SK, and anyone els they want. They would hit us harder later.

one million troops spear out in 5-7 american coastal cities armed with rockets, grenades, bazookas, armor piercing rounds in their automatic weapons, and wearing body armor and possibly even light tanks as support would be a nightmare. They would burn the cities and disperse before we could send in troops to kill them (airstrikes would be hazardous because there could be millions of potential civilian deaths from it)

Damn man, have some faith in your country. How long do you think it takes to burn a city...
How long do you think it takes to get jets loaded with bombs above that Chinese- infested city?
This isn't ancient Rome, we can travel preeeeeeetty quick nowadays.

[saberon]

Israel, all fronts at once.

Yep. It was on what, 4 fronts? And they got within spitting distance of two of their enemies capital cities before a cease-fire was declared.

[Kaneiac]

If you mean the US that certainly doesn't count. They didn't start any land offensives against Japan until the war in Germany had come to an end. I don't think it counts as fighting on two fronts.

Correct. And it certainly wasn't strictly the US in Japan OR Europe either.

In the Pacific there was the aid of the Australian forces, and in Europe there was this coalition called the Allies. I wonder who they consisted of?

[stabetha]

Israel, all fronts at once.

true, so two nations and pretty soon looks like one of those countries are going to have to do it again

[Retributed]

Causing another world war at this point would be a terrible idea for any one country.

[Deleted]

because they are accurate right? lol i was in the military in a weapons squad, i was a javilin gunner for the US army, once u use a targeting system as advanced as that u come tell me who has good weapons and i have used both of those junk ass old weapons

'javilin'
1. You spelt it wrong
2. The US army does not use the FGM-148 Javelin (Which is what you're referring too, that would be the British and your special forces.)
3.EMP's completely disable them, Any idiot can make an EMP.

Your argument is invalid.