Atleast I'm willing to admit that fire will do better than arcane on some fights. I'm not trying to say that arcane will be #1 for every fight absolute top dps always, I know it won't. But people acting like fire (for another patch) is the only choice and that fire is super op, and that arcane can't touch fire and that fire will beat arcane every fight is just -wrong-. It is wrong. If you believe that (not you Imnick, fearist) then you have another thing coming. Arcane will excell on certain fights, fire won't do bottom of the chart dps, but arcane will have an edge on quite a few fights. Same with fire, it will have an edge on a few fights. It depends the fights.
People saying that arcane is 100% un-viable are just wrong. Both specs will be playable next tier. This arguement is stupid at this point.
This thread has kind of depleted it's purpose. PTR is ending soon, fire got nerfed. Arcane and fire will be viable next patch. Let's leave it at that and close this thread.
Yeah this is getting pretty pointless. Its obvious that fire and arcane both have a place and saying otherwise is just silly. I'll be playing arcane week 1 just because I've been playing fire for a long ass time and its getting boring. I will however have fire gems ready and waiting because there will be a day/boss that it has to happen.
#1 fire mage US. u mirin'?
"Aaah ah ah ah ah ah ah yea, f*ck me, ah, f*ck, aah yeah"
- Jenna Jameson
ok my last post on this matter since its really off topic and i dont want to get banned for "trolling".
ok i mean i can see how they are similiar, i mean theyre both made of lava so i can kinda see how you would make that connection but hmmm im just not seeing it my man. i think the set is just suppose to look like a fire mage.
#1 fire mage US. u mirin'?
"Aaah ah ah ah ah ah ah yea, f*ck me, ah, f*ck, aah yeah"
- Jenna Jameson