Sen. Rand Paul assaulted at his Kentucky home, man arrested

[Doctor Amadeus]

The worst dispute I had was a neighbor blocking my driveway. We worked it out and everything was cool and all my neighbors are Democrats with the same way exception to one who is a libertarian. All in the neighborhood watch. A big reason I would never move to Alaska when I retire. If I do I’m going to be picky as to who I sell to. In fact I’ll sell a little under if it’s on of my neighbors kids coming back from college.

Guess poor Rand got a crappy one. Goo think he’ll live.

[Daelak]

Well, if we are being historically accurate, the racists of the 1940's were Democrats. That is just a fact. Every KKK member who ever lived, was a Democrat, at this point in history. /shrug

It's pretty sad when a bunch of posters are all up in arms over my statement that all riots are Democrats, then they can't produce a SINGLE counter fact. One would think this would lead them to reconsider but, nope. They double down and keep digging back to things their own party did, and try to pin it on Republicans.

The irony of your statements about how confident you are that "these people" (read: poor blacks) are democrats even though they are statistically more likely not even allowed to vote in any election due to their inability to get an ID, or they are felons, is telling. You want it both ways, and in your eyes, they will forever be despised because whatever they do to redress their grievances or engage in civil disobedience as a form of showing society how aggrieved they are, you will still consider them lesser because you have the obvious inability to empathize with them, which is from you being brainwashed.

[Travis B]

Well, if we are being historically accurate, the racists of the 1940's were Democrats. That is just a fact. Every KKK member who ever lived, was a Democrat, at this point in history. /shrug

In the post that I replied to, you said "Just link ONE group of Conservatives rioting." I provided such a link. It's sad to see you move the goalposts like this.

[Tijuana]

In the post that I replied to, you said "Just link ONE group of Conservatives rioting." I provided such a link. It's sad to see you move the goalposts like this.

Two links were provided. One is a demonstration that is jokingly called "The Brooks Brothers Riot", and the other was a riot of random ass Californians, that had nothing to do with either party, according to what was linked. So again, I ask you, show me ONE riot of Republicans, or Conservatives, or even by groups of people that self identify as such. You can't. Because it's not a thing. You have THOUSANDS of riots to choose from, but the problem is, they were all full of Democrats. I think that is a point worth making, but I'm not sure I want to argue it until the end of time. The bottom line is, I'm right and you are wrong.

[Travis B]

Two links were provided. One is a demonstration that is jokingly called "The Brooks Brothers Riot", and the other was a riot of random ass Californians, that had nothing to do with either party, according to what was linked. So again, I ask you, show me ONE riot of Republicans, or Conservatives, or even by groups of people that self identify as such. You can't. Because it's not a thing. You have THOUSANDS of riots to choose from, but the problem is, they were all full of Democrats. I think that is a point worth making, but I'm not sure I want to argue it until the end of time. The bottom line is, I'm right and you are wrong.

You keep thinking that Ransath.

[Tijuana]

You keep thinking that Ransath.

Uh, I'm not Ransath though. Although we often agree, I'm offended that you could confuse us. It's like calling Yoda, Luke Skywalker.

[Stop Pretending]

Two links were provided. One is a demonstration that is jokingly called "The Brooks Brothers Riot", and the other was a riot of random ass Californians, that had nothing to do with either party, according to what was linked. So again, I ask you, show me ONE riot of Republicans, or Conservatives, or even by groups of people that self identify as such. You can't. Because it's not a thing. You have THOUSANDS of riots to choose from, but the problem is, they were all full of Democrats. I think that is a point worth making, but I'm not sure I want to argue it until the end of time. The bottom line is, I'm right and you are wrong.

YOU keep proving that YOU have a hard time reading and comprehending. Oh look, you're banned again, I guess you kinda kept your word.

[Travis B]

Uh, I'm not Ransath though. Although we often agree, I'm offended that you could confuse us. It's like calling Yoda, Luke Skywalker.

Sure, whatever you say Ransath.

[Breccia]

If we're done pointing out how TJ is an admitted troll and liar, it's worth reminding everyone that blindsiding a US Senator carries some legal penalties, surprise surprise.

Paul’s injuries and his aide’s statement do not bode well for Boucher. Currently, he is charged with assault in the fourth degree, which is a misdemeanor. But that could change — so could the potential consequences if he is found guilty.

A defendant is guilty of assault in the fourth degree if he is found to have intentionally or wantonly caused physical injury to the victim. “Physical injury” is defined as substantial physical pain or impairment of physical condition, under Kentucky law.

The difference between this misdemeanor assault and felony assault in the second degree comes down to one word: “Serious."

A person commits felony second degree assault when he intentionally causes serious physical injury, according to Kentucky law, which is more than just physical injury. It includes prolonged impairment of health, or impairment of the function of any bodily organ, and broken ribs and impairment of the lungs appear to qualify. Ultimately, whether an injury is serious or just a misdemeanor injury is up to the jury at trial.

Paul’s newly-reported, more serious injuries could lead the state prosecutors to charge Boucher instead with the more-serious felony assault. The difference is punishment is massive. The misdemeanor assault carries a maximum term of a year of confinement, while a felony assault conviction carries a minimum of five and a maximum of ten years.

Could Boucher be charged with a federal crime? Ordinarily, an assault on an ordinary citizen does not involve federal law. But Paul is a U.S. senator, and federal law criminalizes assaults on members of Congress. Lesser assaults, like throwing a punch without landing the blow, or a slap that doesn’t injure, are punishable by one year of imprisonment and a fine.

Assaults that result in any personal injury are punishable by up to ten years of imprisonment.

[Glnger]

Paul was boinking the guy's wife, the flower dispute story is already unraveling

[Breccia]

Paul was boinking the guy's wife, the flower dispute story is already unraveling

I'm just going to say "nope" to that one.

[Glnger]

I'm just going to say "nope" to that one.

would it be more believable if I tried to sell vitamins and supplements after my outrageous claim?

it's more than flowers... believe me, bigly!