i really don't see why people try to suggest "spellbreaker" as a seperate class

[skannerz22]

when a prot paladin already is a spell breaker
it's tinker vs gnomish engineering all over again

i can silence 4 players and 4 npc's seperately
i can interupt 1 npc/player
i can stun 1 npc/player
i can knockback(interupt) infinite amount of players in range
i can become immune to spells
i can absorb all damage
i can be immune to all damage
i can reset my shield cooldown then silence more npc's(or wait to silence players)
i can block spells and they deal damage to the attacker



early legion prot paladins were out healing every healing class with infinite mana in pvp(it got nerfed in 7.2)

prot paladins are spell breakers
and if you have been asking for spell breakers and didn't play a prot paladin
well shit you missed out big time

[Deleted]

so much work, but nobody cares

[skannerz22]

so much work, but nobody cares

i guess you're a nobody that cares
thanks for caring mister nobody

[Eazy]

Probably because this is Spellbreaker:



And this is a paladin:


But to be honest - I'd like to have mail melee class. I mean the pure anti-mage. It could have even the ranged spec(dark ranger) and another half-melee/half-ranged - warden spec, or something like it...

Runemaster/Infiltrator
-Spellbreaker(dps or tank(?) spec),
-dark ranger(ranged)
-warden(melee/ranged(?))

[skannerz22]

Probably because this is Spellbreaker:



And this is a paladin:


But to be honest - I'd like to have mail melee class. I mean the pure anti-mage. It could have even the ranged spec(dark ranger) and another half-melee/half-ranged - warden spec, or something like it...

Runemaster/Infiltrator
-Spellbreaker(dps or tank(?) spec),
-dark ranger(ranged)
-warden(melee/ranged(?))

that's not a spell breaker that's a warrior gaurd they have like 1-2 abilities
and that's not even a paladin that's a private server

do you even know what world of warcraft is?

[op3l]

How about a pure buff class? Something like the Bard from Ragnarok.

The play style would be to target different classes and use your skills on them. Like you would have AoE buffs that you can use to buff an area, and single target buffs where you have to collect combo points or what not on a friendly target, then use a big finishing buff on that target to increase DPS or survivability for that target.

I feel like WoW is limited in a way that doesn't give more play styles. Spell breakers sounds fun and all, but what you gonna do when you meet an arms warrior or a outlaw rogue? Just wave your hand and die? Plus it wouldn't make much sense PvE wise cause can't really lock down a raid boss.

Meh

[A Chozo]

But to be honest - I'd like to have mail melee class. I mean the pure anti-mage. It could have even the ranged spec(dark ranger) and another half-melee/half-ranged - warden spec, or something like it...

Runemaster/Infiltrator
-Spellbreaker(dps or tank(?) spec),
-dark ranger(ranged)
-warden(melee/ranged(?))

Spellbreaking could be a Warden spec. They are very agile, but their armor looks plate, which could translate into a Mail class.

Spellbreaking
Tracker
Glaive Expert

[Eazy]

that's not a spell breaker that's a warrior gaurd they have like 1-2 abilities
and that's not even a paladin that's a private server

do you even know what world of warcraft is?

Wtf? That's a spellbreaker. The official spellbreaker from the Warcraft site.

"warrior guard" - Hahaha

It seems it's you who don't know what WoW is.

Spellbreaking could be a Warden spec. They are very agile, but their armor looks plate, which could translate into a Mail class.

Spellbreaking
Tracker
Glaive Expert

Yeah, that was just a fast idea. Though that could be a thing.

[tristannarutofan]

so are you saying that paladins shoudlnt exist because priests and warriors do?

or are you saying because i can become immune to damage , silence people and disrupt magic my mage, demon hunter, Hunter, rogue are also spellbreakers.

If you simply things enough you can make any point.

A rock and the universe are the same because they both exist and neither is a potato. /thread

[skannerz22]

How about a pure buff class? Something like the Bard from Ragnarok.

The play style would be to target different classes and use your skills on them. Like you would have AoE buffs that you can use to buff an area, and single target buffs where you have to collect combo points or what not on a friendly target, then use a big finishing buff on that target to increase DPS or survivability for that target.

I feel like WoW is limited in a way that doesn't give more play styles. Spell breakers sounds fun and all, but what you gonna do when you meet an arms warrior or a outlaw rogue? Just wave your hand and die? Plus it wouldn't make much sense PvE wise cause can't really lock down a raid boss.

Meh

bards are a rogue
http://baldursgate.wikia.com/wiki/Bard
all these "bards" doing buffs in other games aren't bards
baldurs gate existed way before the other games and was heavily influenced by dungeons and dragons

- - - Updated - - -

Spellbreaking could be a Warden spec. They are very agile, but their armor looks plate, which could translate into a Mail class.

Spellbreaking
Tracker
Glaive Expert

a legion prot paladin is a spell breaker *facepalm* we already have it
go log in and make one

- - - Updated - - -

Wtf? That's a spellbreaker. The official spellbreaker from the Warcraft site.

"warrior guard" - Hahaha

It seems it's you who don't know what WoW is.



Yeah, that was just a fast idea. Though that could be a thing.

i guess you missed the news where paladins are warriors that cast spells *cough* spell breaker *cough*
/cast avengers shield
*silences you* shh

wow and warcraft aren't the same game
YOU clearly don't know what world of warcraft is
wow is a spin off of warcraft
paladins are spellbreakers
http://baldursgate.wikia.com/wiki/Bard
technically paladins are bards as well in wow but what ever

- - - Updated - - -

so are you saying that paladins shoudlnt exist because priests and warriors do?

or are you saying because i can become immune to damage , silence people and disrupt magic my mage, demon hunter, Hunter, rogue are also spellbreakers.

If you simply things enough you can make any point.

A rock and the universe are the same because they both exist and neither is a potato. /thread

spellbreaker is a sub class spin off of a prot paladin

i posted 9 screenshots of abilities a spell breaker would have to you know..break spells *rolls eyes*
legion prot paladins=spellbreaker
if you didn't make a prot paladin then it sucks to be you right now you're missing out on playing a spell breaker in wow

[A Chozo]

a legion prot paladin is a spell breaker *facepalm* we already have it
go log in and make one

A Prot Paladin is a shield-wielding protector of the weak, deliver of justice.

A Spellbreaker is a warrior'ish-type who dabs into the arcane arts to empower himself, AND has control over his opponent using potent spellcraft and melee tactics. The spellbreaker is, as the name implies, a specialist into negating the mage-types.

"Holy Protector of the Land and the Weak" =/= "Arcane Knight, magical-disabler of maverick wizards".

You think it's all about the spells - the spells aren't even half of the fantasy.

[Gaidax]

We totally need another melee that shits on casters.

[Darktbs]

Op, when people bring up new class ideas, they are talking more then just Spells, its about the thematic of the class, the fantasy, things that make them cool and unique among other classes.

If we are just going to say"Spellbreakers are Paladins because silence" "Necromancers are Dk because SUmmoning undead" 'Tinkerers are Engineers because they can make stuff"we would end up with...5 classes, a casters, a dual wielder, a ranger , a sword/shield wielder and a 2h Wielder.Because anything else can be placed/expanded under these categories.

[Lochton]

Spellbreaker wouldn't be a class if anything, it would be a specc. And no, Paladins don't count as spellbreakers.

[skannerz22]

Op, when people bring up new class ideas, they are talking more then just Spells, its about the thematic of the class, the fantasy, things that make them cool and unique among other classes..

A legion prot paladin is a warrior'ish-type who dabs into the holy arts to empower himself, AND has control over his opponent using potent spellcraft and melee tactics. The legion paladin is, as the name implies, a specialist into negating the mage-types.

see what i did here *facepalm*

- - - Updated - - -

We totally need another melee that shits on casters.

give warriors a 4th arcane spec
poof
a second "spell breaker" is born even after that people would still be crying out for a "spell breaker" "class"

[Micronetic]

i really don't see why people try to suggest "spellbreaker" as a seperate class

Which people? You and this thread are the first I ever heard and read of this "spellbreaker"?

[Darktbs]

see what i did here *facepalm*

No, the only thing i see you do is hurt your own face, stop doing that you will end up creating a hole bigger then the silithus one.Maybe if that happen you will see how your logic is dumb.

[skannerz22]

sub classes are stupid for wow it's not the type of game to have them

give paladins a 4th spec that is named spell breaker and have it revolve around anti magic and silencing abilities

give warriors a 4th spec that is named tinker and have it revolve around engineering

give rogues a 4th spec that is named bard and it has 2 attack abilities+ 1 heal+ 15 to 20 buff spells

these 3 literally do not need their own classes to function in wow
just make it a 4th spec and be done with it

+shaman tanks as a 4th spec of course☺

druids were a 2 dps and 1 heal class back in vanilla,bc,wotlk,cata,(mop?)
they were the first class to get a 4th spec
time for some other 4th specs to satisfy QQ

- - - Updated - - -

Which people? You and this thread are the first I ever heard and read of this "spellbreaker"?

you missed out...pre-blizzcon fan posts

[Azerate]

sub classes are stupid for wow it's not the type of game to have them

give paladins a 4th spec that is named spell breaker and have it revolve around anti magic and silencing abilities

give warriors a 4th spec that is named tinker and have it revolve around engineering

give rogues a 4th spec that is named bard and it has 2 attack abilities+ 1 heal+ 15 to 20 buff spells

these 3 literally do not need their own classes to function in wow
just make it a 4th spec and be done with it

+shaman tanks as a 4th spec of course☺

druids were a 2 dps and 1 heal class back in vanilla,bc,wotlk,cata,(mop?)
they were the first class to get a 4th spec
time for some other 4th specs to satisfy QQ

- - - Updated - - -



you missed out...pre-blizzcon fan posts

Feral was both dps and tank depending on player choice.

Also, death knights, demon hunters, monks could also be specs of something else. It all depends on how they set it up. I'm all for new classes and looking forward to more.

[GRAMMARAXIS]

Spellbreaking could be a Warden spec. They are very agile, but their armor looks plate, which could translate into a Mail class.

Spellbreaking
Tracker
Glaive Expert

As I understand it, Spell Breakers are trained by the Arcane Sanctum (I remember mass producing those just because they looked cool) and are Elven Warriors that are trained to manipulate and shut out the arcane and then further develop such abilities to hunt Necromancers and unlawful wizards. I don't recall them having any master of light, and their most famous spell is "Spell Steal", which belongs to the Mage. Besides that, I don't know what is cannon: in some RPG sources I seem to recall them having the ability to make other people forget spells, and they're supposed to be masters of double blades, tracking, etc. Depicted also with giant shields.

The Warden would be a perfect fit to have a Spellbreaker, especially since the Warden also comes from Elven customs and the Spellbreaking could be a part of that ancestory -- especially how they constructed runes to hide their arcane usage around Silvermoon. Tailored to necromatic hunting, perhaps. The Jailer could also be a spec. focused on CC's in some way. A CC tank might be interesting.

Not even sure where someone would think warrior = tinker would be good (hunter would probably fit this best with guns and tools to fling complex traps and gadgets -- as well as mechanical pets now being a thing. Though I imagine after seeing the High Tinker that one would expect a giant robot to control). They've been known for shutting down spell casters in PvP for almost the entirety of WoW until charge was made a root, heroic leap was brought back to one use and demon hunters were introduced. But I guess that's besides the point of what was trying to be emphasized.

The problem thereof is that they'd have to release spec. specific armor for Warden, Jailer and Spellbreaker to really sell the fantasy. Or make the Alliance Version look like the Wardens and the Horde version look like Spellbreakers in terms of aesthetics.

Additionally, if we are going this far, then we might as well just combine everything. There should only be a Warrior, Rogue and Wizard class. Which can then specialize. Because a tank is a tank, a leather wearer can use martial arts or have a bow or be a bard, and cloth just screams magi... there need not be 12+ classes. Hybrids are the most guilty, like Druids. So as a whole, no fun allowed at all and limited choice. Something seeming like it overlaps is irrelevant as we have seen with the Demon Hunter and Death Knight, with them taking skills from existing classes since it's a part of their lore.