No, it really doesn't.
it's clear that he died of eating too much sugar from the candy. Or he is allergic to something in the candy, or whatever, but it's the candy. It's not poisonous, not Chinese lead flavored. It's a good quality candy. And it's the amount of it that killed the kid.
What you are doing is trying to change the narrative because you disagree with the answer.
Not as much as the video about a kid who spent $13k on mt.
And that's idiotic, clearly the fault is solely on the drunk. How can a bar even know if he's driving? Should they ask? What if the guy says no?
As idiotic as the bar.