I have no advice for you on what to do with a pregnancy--you asked what alternatives there are if you don't view abortion as an option. Since keeping it is already being covered ad nauseum, I covered adoption.
I have no advice for you on what to do with a pregnancy--you asked what alternatives there are if you don't view abortion as an option. Since keeping it is already being covered ad nauseum, I covered adoption.
No I was merely showing you how illogical your argument is.
"Each person was a willing participant in an action where they should have known the possible consequences". Ok so they're responsible. They knew the consequences. Why is it that they're allowed an abortion again ? Yeah in your world, they wouldnt be allowed to.
The core of your cognitive dissonance is laid out pretty clearly here. You jump from the procreation act, then to the birth, then to the possible divorce. Dont you think you missed a step ? Ever heard of pregnancy ? Ever heard of abortion ?
That's pretty much the core of your cognitive dissonance. You completely ignore that abortion exist and how it changed parenthood.
That your personal way of handling the classic gear shift between men and women. Big talk about responsability and how people knew the consequence, but only for the man.
Because you wont dare apply that hard logic to the woman : so she can unilaterally abort at anytime, or she can unilaterally carry the prgenancy to terms no matter what the father want. And if so the father have to pay. What are his wishes ? Nobody care. Not exactly a clear cut of equal rights here.
And of course you have to end your post with, wait for it ""take some responsibility"". The more I read you, the sadder it get.
That doesn't make me a woman hater. I would support the same if the genders were reversed.
- - - Updated - - -
And the law is wrong and oppressive of men, which is how you get cases like this or worse, because men are unwilling to be oppressed by it.
" Helped conceive "
Fucking please, you just donated DNA. No different from a sperm donor.
The matter here is that you and the other feminazis just want to punish men for wanting to have a sex life, like any woman can have without this risk.
If you want to argue against abortion, them that is the argument you should make. If you want to argue in favor of mandating abortions... Then you are a true authoritarian, and a terrible person.
Th e part that you fail to grasp, is that the pregnancy is inevitable if no other actions are taking. In reality, you want to have the male avoid responsibility, because the female did not take a second action.
I have stated multiple times that both men and women bear the responsibility. You are continuing to argue against something I am not saying.
If the man gets custody, the woman pays. Both people take responsibility.
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah, it really does. You are consistently whining that men have to be responsible for the consequences of their actions. You are blaming women at every turn..
Right. Overall I feel like people quoting my post are missing the point. If you're 100% sure you do not want a child with a person, then YOU as an individual need to take it upon yourself to make sure that you do not take your partner on their word regarding birth control. Wear a condom, use spermicide, pull out, use whatever means at your disposal. If you place your faith in another person regarding birth control measures, then you're equally accountable for what happens if one half of the couple gets pregnant. You're also increasing the risk of pregnancy by not doing everything you can to avoid an unwanted pregnancy on your end. Personal accountability is important here, for BOTH parties. Of course, no birth control is 100% effective, but if both parties are truly doing everything possible to avoid pregnancy, then it greatly mitigates the risk.
Getting the snip just means you're covered for an entire lifetime of total reproductive control for like $2k or less. Of course you don't HAVE to, but why wouldn't you? The positives far outweigh the negatives.
women will have to accept that its not fair to make such a decision alonehaving an abortion, which I didn’t want to do
How is that oppressive? Enlighten me please? I mean have you ever heard of condoms ( even though they are not 100% solution )?
I mean if im willing to have sax without condom ( and most men are ) then i accept the risks. I can't ask a girl to be on a pill because its not normal to do that jsut so you can fck without it.
If you don't know the difference then i bet you are still a virgin...
Don't fuck or get sterilised? Those are the options men need to take to have the same security a woman does? As I said, the law is sexist and needs to change. Until it does don't be surprised when cases like this happen.
- - - Updated - - -
Nah man never heard of them. But I bet they'd have a failure chance.
Also I have to express one more time how much I love it when some nu-male or feminist tries to throw in a personal insult because my arguments are getting them way too salty.
It's simple, as long as it's 100% the woman's choice to carry to term you cannot and should not expect the man to shoulder half the cost.
Okay, I'm getting real tired of this " Nu uh, you doooo " game. So you can cut the crap or get blocked, I don't have time to explain ten times that being against the actions of someone doesn't mean you are against said someone's gender.
It's not my fault the feminists brainwashed you into thinking that if you disagree with something a woman does you're sexist.
- - - Updated - - -
The father who tells you outright he wants no part in the kid's life.
If you're driven by the conviction that women are out to wallet rape you for your sperm and you're adamantly against supporting a child you helped conceive, then yes, by all means you should exercise the choices available to you instead of looking to the law to absolve you of your financial responsibility.
Last edited by Levelfive; 2017-12-16 at 08:53 PM.
I know it's not like this in Eastern countries, but here in the US if you become pregnant then you're basically on your own a good portion of the time in regards to raising it. Some people have more or less supportive families. Our safety net programs for mothers is not that great, although there is the WIC program for low-income mothers and subsidized child care.
Well you might heard of them but i bet you never used them.....
You need to google and learn what insult is and then use that word, before that i can't take you serious.
Ofc its should be 100% her choice, its her fcking body, her health in question, her risk, you as a man don't bare any health related problems when it comes to being pregnant.
I'm not arguing against abortion. I'm just trying to understand what are you arguing for.
Because right now your ass is between two chairs :
The "Personal responsabilities, they knew the consequences" of the Anti-abortion.
And the "Individual freedom, my body my rules" of the Pro-abortion.
That situation make it rather easy for me to keep kicking you in the balls, repeatedly, in the same spot because you cant adress it. If you really believe that abortion should be legal, then you gave up the right to invoke "They fucked, they're responsible" as your leitmotiv.
Also I'm very much a pro-abortion myself, because I believe individual freedom should prevail here, and LOGICALLY, that lead me to believe that if the man doesnt want the child and express his wish to renounce his right and duties to it and to child support, then he should be able to.