Uranium One Deal - Grand Jury Indictment

[Saucexorzski]

You claim to not be a Trump supporter, but spend a lot of time supporting Trump.

Just the same amount of time as you do supporting him.

- - - Updated - - -

This is total non-response to what he said.

It's the truth. If you think other wise your personal bias against me is clearly blinding you.

[Mormolyce]

Russian companies are dodgy money launderers? Who knew?

It was their duty to give away our Uranium to our enemy? Interesting.

You are aware that that uranium is still in the United States, yes?

[Garnier Fructis]

It's the truth. If you think other wise your personal bias against me is clearly blinding you.

We barely interact on this forum, so you have to have a pretty inflated sense of self if you think I actually have a personal bias against you.

As to the 'truth', we have a post suggesting connections to Trump's administration, Green Jesus dropping "administration" and going 'Y U BLAME TRUMP?' and a sarcastic comment.

Who's blaming this on Trump?

[Saucexorzski]

We barely interact on this forum, so you have to have a pretty inflated sense of self if you think I actually have a personal bias against you.

As to the 'truth', we have a post suggesting connections to Trump's administration, Green Jesus dropping "administration" and going 'Y U BLAME TRUMP?' and a sarcastic comment.

Who's blaming this on Trump?

Edge did on the first page. And you do have a bias. Just like everyone else.

[Edge-]

Edge did on the first page.

Please quote where I blame Trump.

[Bdatik]

Edge did on the first page. And you do have a bias. Just like everyone else.

Not sure you're aware of this, but Flynn and Trump are not the same person.

[Garnier Fructis]

Edge did on the first page. And you do have a bias. Just like everyone else.

I just explained to you that the post you're talking about very careful said members of his administration, and not the man himself.

And here you go doing exactly the same thing that as OP. And you accuse *me* of bias and blindness?

[Saucexorzski]

Please quote where I blame Trump.

If you didn't mean to blame Trump on this you wouldn't have invoked his administration, but really I don't care that you blamed them, I find it funny, like how everything was Obama's fault or bushes fault or Clinton's fault.

[Garnier Fructis]

If you didn't mean to blame Trump on this you wouldn't have invoked his administration, but really I don't care that you blamed them, I find it funny, like how everything was Obama's fault or bushes fault or Clinton's fault.

Ah, proof by lack of imagination.

[Edge-]

If you didn't mean to blame Trump on this you wouldn't have invoked his administration, but really I don't care that you blamed them, I find it funny, like how everything was Obama's fault or bushes fault or Clinton's fault.

I mentioned they were members of his campaign and administration because some of their actions were taken during their time in both groups.

So again, link where I actually blamed Trump.

[alexw]

Sometimes the stupidity of people makes my eyes bleed. This is one of those cases.

[Saucexorzski]

I mentioned they were members of his campaign and administration because some of their actions were taken during their time in both groups.

So again, link where I actually blamed Trump.

Easy, by association. If you don't want to blame him just say you are not blaming Trump, I'll believe you.

[Edge-]

Easy, by association. If you don't want to blame him just say you are not blaming Trump, I'll believe you.

I'm not blaming Trump for the sale.

Does that satisfy your arbitrary requirement?

[Saucexorzski]

Ah, proof by lack of imagination.

If you lack imagination that's on you man, personally I don't think you do. Come on give yourself some credit.

- - - Updated - - -

I'm not blaming Trump for the sale.

Does that satisfy your arbitrary requirement?

Cool, guess my sarrcasim was misplaced. My bad.

[pathora44]

Republicans and Trump supporters on Mueller investigation: "How dare you commit this witch hunt on Trump he is totally innocent. You are politically going after our president and wasting millions of the taxpayers money."

Republicans and Trump supporters on Clinton investigation: "Yes, take down Crooked Hillary this will be the one. This maybe the 7th, 8th, possibly double digit investigation we have tried to get her on even though every other one has been found to not indict her, but this will be the one to get her. All those millions upon millions upon millions of dollars we have spent will all be worth it when we get her. If we don't then we will put our hopes on the soon to be coming next investigation because we need to find her guilty of something."

[Garnier Fructis]

If you lack imagination that's on you man, personally I don't think you do. Come on give yourself some credit.

Not accepting your interpretation is not me lacking imagination. You going "I can't imagine any other reason why he would do it, so he clearly did it for that reason" is you lacking imagination.

This was nothing more than a failed "no u" on your part.

[Cthulhu 2020]

We should probably follow the money of the Russian money launderers involved in this deal and see where the string leads. Oh it leads to Trump?

NOTHING TO SEE HERE, INVESTIGATION CLOSED.

[Saucexorzski]

Not accepting your interpretation is not me lacking imagination. You going "I can't imagine any other reason why he would do it, so he clearly did it for that reason" is you lacking imagination.

This was nothing more than a failed "no u" on your part.

Yep, i already cleared it up with Edge, you are late to the party but ill still give you 1/2 an internet point, Lucky you!

[LaserSharkDFB]

So, looking over the article, I notice that it isn't at all clear what this indictment actually has to do with the Uranium One deal. This Lambert guy was bribing a Russian who works for their nuclear power corporation, but why? For what purpose? Did he have any connection to the Obama administration, or did they just stumble across his bribery by accident during their broader investigation? The article includes a quote from Grassley, but it's an old quote and has nothing to do with this indictment.

This article appears to be two-thirds fake news. The first third is news; some Maryland guy got indicted. However, the author then brings up the movement of uranium to Europe, which doesn't seem to be directly related to the indictment (unless there are other details that the author left out), and then to make it anti-Clinton he brought up the Grassley quote. Without showing a direct link between thus guy and the Obama administration, this is just a badly-made hit piece.

[NYC17]

It was their duty to give away our Uranium to our enemy? Interesting.

Well, they didn't give away uranium, so maybe it's time for you to move on to subjects that don't require you to have the basic facts of subject correct, or even known. Perhaps something more pressing, such as video game emotes...