india has been whining for years, they aren't the ones that are building the jet or providing any sort of expertise, they keep making new demands n have for years wanted a 2-seat plane. But, they have never pulled out of the project. Have seen plenty of articles declaring india is leaving the project, year after year, well, why don't they?
- - - Updated - - -
Yes, very much 5th gen, go cry in a corner about it.
Btw the article writes,
Btw the jet has a new engine, I supposed the article was going to have issues about the jet but there was hardly any mention of it.Nevertheless, a panel instated by the Indian Ministry of Defense, headed by retired Air Marshal Simhakutty Varthaman, purportedly recommended in August 2017 that the project, despite its high cost, proceed.
Last edited by mmocced9c7d33d; 2018-02-25 at 05:30 PM.
Ah alright, no analogous system in the universe, Russia is ridiculously behind on it's electronics but if it makes you happy call it a 5th gen
Nevertheless, a panel instated by the Indian Ministry of Defense, headed by retired Air Marshal Simhakutty Varthaman, purportedly recommended in August 2017 that the project, despite its high cost, proceed.
heh
Plz tell us all what you know about its electronics.
Can't you read?heh
Nevertheless, a panel instated by the Indian Ministry of Defense, headed by retired Air Marshal Simhakutty Varthaman, purportedly recommended in August 2017 that the project, despite its high cost, proceed.
Reported, again, you are obviously talking nonsense and they have plenty of drones.
https://sputniknews.com/military/201...ke-drone-2018/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan_Skat
http://defence-blog.com/news/russia-...maks-2017.html
What is a "proper drone" btw? Most of ur drones hit civilians more than terrorists.
Last edited by mmocced9c7d33d; 2018-02-25 at 06:26 PM.
I'll be putting you on ignore since you are only capable of making one-liners.
Don't talk about 5th gen when you cannot say anything about it, btw Russia is making a 2nd stealth jet, the Mig41
as for drones, you don't know much about them, hell even artillery comes with them.
and then there's development of submarine drones armed with nukes
I hope you are not replying to me, since like I said I can't see your post, but then again like you proved with the indians, reading isn't your strength
Oh hey look, its pissing match about who has the bestest plane! I am not sure what it has to do with Syrian Army supporting kurds (except in fantasy dogfights between Su-57 and F-35 over Syria), but oh well, I'll put my two cents here.
It does NOT matter how good or better than F-22 and F-35 it might be (or is, if that makes you feel better, whatever). It does not. What does matter is that there are 10 flying prototypes versus 3+ times more F-35's in USA service (with 260+ made overall) and ~180 F-22's.
There is not going to be 100 Su-57 this year. There is not going to be 100 in next one too. It's basically guaranteed that there won't be 100 planes in service 3 years from now on and most likely even more. How many F-35 there are going to be after 3 years, though?
Same as with Armata. Russia potentially has one advantage over NATO, which is the amount of main battle tanks. However, majority of those are T-72 in multiple variants. Most of those haven't been upgraded to the latest and greatest - T-72B3 and all of them won't be anyway. Read, they have crapload of old tanks, without modern targeting systems (which in war would end oh so well...) and armed with decades old ammunition (pretty sure that Mango is still in use as main ammo). It will take A LOT of time to rearm at least half of them to T-14's, more than decade for sure, most likely two, it takes manufacturing capacity which does not exist anymore. Russia is not USSR which could stamp tanks like hotcakes.
Note - I am not counting T-55/T-62/T-64. All of them are in reserves since 2014, IIRC, and are being actively sold off to other countries. Even with them T-72 still takes half of the total tank forces.
You do not want to meet M1A2/L2A6/whatever in T-72xxx. You just don't.
I will not argue whether Su-57 is the bestest stealth 5th gen plane ever made (though I have my doubts about it's radar crossection). However, USA has decades and decades of actual experience, of using stealth planes in war. Russia does not. Catching up just in "few" years? Decide on your own how possible that is.
1) Load the amount of weight I would deadlift onto the bench
2) Unrack
3) Crank out 15 reps
4) Be ashamed of constantly skipping leg day
The SAA doesn't want the Hatay scenario to repeat itself when it comes to Afrin and Idlib. Syria was a victim of Turkish landgrabbing once before and landgrabbing is what the whole operation looks like. Russia demands territorial integrity for Syria on paper, but we all know that the land won't be given back; at least not untill Assad steps down and even then it's a stretch to go by. This is why I believe the SAA is trying to act on it's own, but is essentially powerless as Russia sold a piece of Syria out to Turkey by greenlighting this invasion; it is hard for me to believe that Russia is naive enough to not understand that the land taken won't be given back. Russia is simply trying to play around with a rift between Turkey and the US, hoping to further isolate them from eachother, but we all know that won't work. What will essentially happen is that Syria loses more land.
Last edited by Magnagarde; 2018-02-26 at 06:54 PM.
Yeah shithole in Syria is all Turkey desires. I mean if it was Latakia, I could understand but fucking Afrin, al-bab and Idlib...giant shitholes with the least educated populace on earth. No, we do not want that.
I doubt Turkey wants it. Syrians barely want it.
Assad has to play nice with the Kurds though. Once Turkey leaves, they still have to be dealt with and he can’t afford to fight on another front. I’m sure he also hopes that the Kurds will want revenge against the Turkish-backed Syrian opposition.