Infowars one strike away from YouTube ban

[rda]

To give you the benefit of the doubt, I went and Googled for "Google conservative blacklist". Ever result for pages was just referencing the Damore class action lawsuit, which you already cited.

So I added "-damore" to the search terms, to exclude discussion of that lawsuit. No results regarding any such blacklist any more.

You're not "leaving me guessing". You don't have anything, and you know it.

And to repeat an earlier point; you aren't the audience I'm speaking to. My goal here isn't to convince you that you're wrong. It's to convince everyone else that you're wrong.

Jesus, you can't do anything.

Here is a link about watchlists that Google managers keep about their *employees*:

https://www.msn.com/en-sg/money/tops...ogl/ar-BBI8A3O

Took two searches.

There was a similar link earlier about their watchlist for visitors.

As always, you know nothing, cannot search if your life depended on it, yet are loudly accusing *others* of not having the info. You are just shameless.

[Machismo]

I will leave you guessing. Frankly, it is amazing how little you actually know / have seen or read yet how much weight you put into your opinions, especially compared to those of others. You basically say "it's X" and then spend pages constructing reasons to reject everything talking against that. In the end, it's your loss. Ten years ago I would have happily butted heads for days, but I grew out of it, so we are out of luck here.

So, is that basically saying that people are not as "woke" as you are?

I'll patiently await your evidence.

- - - Updated - - -

It is amazing that even after I mentioned the example I gave specifically for the second time, you manage to spend two paragraphs talking about how I provided nothing.

"GamerGate" isn't evidence, it's a fucking word. I saw GamerGate forums, including the ones on this site... and they were downright hostile and vitriolic. Once aain, I'm going to need some evidence... other wise, I will continue to refute you with another "word."

/The_Donald is still up.

[rda]

So, is that basically saying that people are not as "woke" as you are?

I'll patiently await your evidence.

You were "patiently awaiting evidence" in the other question, too, not noticing the example I provided for two pages, even after I cited it specifically. You are an experienced waiter, so please wait here, too, I don't mind.

[Endus]

Jesus, you can't do anything.

Here is a link about watchlists that Google managers keep about their *employees*:

https://www.msn.com/en-sg/money/tops...ogl/ar-BBI8A3O

Took two searches.

There was a similar link earlier about their watchlist for visitors.

As always, you know nothing, cannot search if your life depended on it, yet are loudly accusing *others* of not having the info. You are just shameless.

That's literally just about the same single lawsuit. And, like the claim about visitor watchlists, there's not really any evidence in their filings that such blacklists were partisan in nature. They claim such, but don't provide evidence of such.

I'll also note that while said lawsuit likes to cite the statements suggesting some managers were keeping personal blacklists of employees behaving poorly (not having right-wing views), there's no indication those were either company-wide nor does the lawsuit include the statements which provoked the responses it quotes, which it really should, if they were so innocent. It makes it look like the exclusion is deliberate, because those statements deserved the responses they earned.

And without that kind of full context, this still is not proof of anything. It's a deliberately weighted accusation that has not been shown to have any merit whatsoever.

[rda]

"GamerGate" isn't evidence, it's a fucking word. I saw GamerGate forums, including the ones on this site... and they were downright hostile and vitriolic. Once aain, I'm going to need some evidence... other wise, I will continue to refute you with another "word."

Oh, right, so you also don't know shit about anything, you just know how to demand things. No, dear, I will leave you to do your own research to determine what Gamergate has to do with Reddit.

[Ryme]

How to convince conspiracy nutjobs they're right: prevent them from talking.

[Machismo]

You were "patiently awaiting evidence" in the other question, too, not noticing the example I provided for two pages, even after I cited it specifically. You are an experienced waiter, so please wait here, too, I don't mind.

Thanks for not backing up your baseless claims, you are doing my work for me.

[Selastan]

No idea what Infowars is, but I hate YouTube so I'm outraged.

[Machismo]

Oh, right, so you also don't know shit about anything, you just know how to demand things. No, dear, I will leave you to do your own research to determine what Gamergate has to do with Reddit.

You made the claim, and used a single word to back it up. I refuted it with a single word (We'll call /The_Donald a single word with the underscore).

Thanks for refusing to back up your baseless claim.

- - - Updated - - -

How to convince conspiracy nutjobs they're right: prevent them from talking.

they are still free to talk.

https://www.infowars.com/

[rda]

... there's no indication those were either company-wide ...

Some were company-wide (eg, the security one), others personal. Other company-wide things included providing extra interviews to women, for example. Totally unbiased, of course. (ROFL)

[Martymark]

How to convince conspiracy nutjobs they're right: prevent them from talking.

Google's company motto is "don't be evil". I used to think this was meant for google. Now it seems like it's a threat against their users.

[Machismo]

Google's company motto is "don't be evil". I used to think this was meant for google. Now it seems like it's a threat against their users.

Would you be this upset if a Christian website refused to advertise porn, or if a bar tossed out a drunk patron who was bothering the other customers?

[DenniZ]

If what they are saying is so dumb and outrageous why not just counter it with hard facts?
The fact that the government wants to silence them is very suspicious to me.

[vipers]

No idea what Infowars is, but I hate YouTube so I'm outraged.

He is just one big joke and there only to sell over priced products

[Machismo]

If what they are saying is so dumb and outrageous why not just counter it with hard facts?
The fact that the government wants to silence them is very suspicious to me.

Well, that's simple... ignorant people don't care about facts. On top of that, it's not Youtube's job to fact check the people posting their ignorant bullshit. They simply chose to stop giving the fake news peddlers a platform. Luckily, you can always visit InfoWars on their very own website.

I'm going to let you in on a little secret, people don't give a shit about facts, they care about a narrative that makes them happy.

Also, it's not the government doing it. f you didn't know that, then it means you didn't read. if you did, it means you are pushing a bullshit narrative.

[Martymark]

Would you be this upset if a Christian website refused to advertise porn, or if a bar tossed out a drunk patron who was bothering the other customers?

I'd be upset if a city banned Martin Luther King from being allowed to march because he would "incite violence".

[Machismo]

I'd be upset if a city banned Martin Luther King from being allowed to march because he would "incite violence".

This isn't the government doing it, it's a private company choosing to stop doing business with another private entity.

Feel free to actually answer my question.

[minteK917]

If what they are saying is so dumb and outrageous why not just counter it with hard facts?
The fact that the government wants to silence them is very suspicious to me.

No, google is a private entity, they dont have any reason to do anything but to remove your content. Google in not a governmental institution, they owe you nothing but fair services. Then again i feel you are exactly the type that would listen to something this nut job says lmao. Because hes going around whining youtube is removing free speech, making it clear he and his follow dont actually know what free speech is.

[Snorkles]

InfoWars peddles all sorts of made up bullshit with the express purpose of making people scared enough to spend $100 on some sugar pills. If YouTube decides that isn't the sort of content they want then fair enough.

[pathora44]

If what they are saying is so dumb and outrageous why not just counter it with hard facts?
The fact that the government wants to silence them is very suspicious to me.

For starters for your second point. What government is silencing Alex Jones? Youtube is not a government, Google is not a government and they don't have to abide with the 1st Amendment because an admitted liar peddles in lies, conspiracy theories, and shit they plaster Conservative imagery all over to sell. Alex Jones has his own damn website to push all the lies and conspiracy theories he wants Youtube isn't required or forced to give him a soapbox to preach from. No matter how much Alex Jones or Reddit tell you Conservatives are the most persecuted class of humans to ever walk the Earth it isn't true.

Which brings us back to your first point. The literal brainless retards who listen to Alex Jones and his ilk do not care about fucking facts or truths. They mean nothing that only get in the way of their narrative in which they get from Alex Jones and his ilk. It has been proven multiple times that actually giving cold hard facts to them only strengthens their belief in the shit Alex Jones peddles.