Yeah I thought that was good:
"This is actually incorrect. You actually had a pretty good application and made it through our initial round of pruning as well as the first round of actual rejections, you most likely as well would've made it into the final round. We removed you at your request but we had no ill will against you. I was actually looking forward to your application because it seemed like you were legitimately interested.
For some transparency in our review process, we've actually hid the names until the end so that we don't know who it is we're reviewing. We wanted a 100% clean slate as both Orynx and I were obviously not around in the original MVP creation. With it having a new role and members, we didn't want anybody to carry past judgments into this new program.
We've actually been specifically looking for people that challenge us, as an MVP is not someone that should just be blinded by us being Blizzard. We should be called out if you disagree with something we're doing and an MVP is a person that should be an example of a way to do that respectfully and eloquently."