You can.
And I'd refute it by pointing to my replys to Tiwack
Hay @Tiwack I'm a nazi aparantly.
Yea don't fall into the logical fallacy of assuming refuting and argument is support for the opposite.
- - - Updated - - -
Technically not. Because part of the definition of peaceful is law abiding and if wearing the mask as against the law they are not peaceful
Last edited by Tiwack; 2018-04-24 at 05:44 PM.
If you knew the candle was fire then the meal was cooked a long time ago.
Well, here's the definition:
1.
free from disturbance; tranquil.
2.
not involving war or violence.
Another:
2 : untroubled by conflict, agitation, or commotion
3 : of or relating to a state or time of peace
4 : devoid of violence or force
And another:
1.
characterized by peace; free from war, strife, commotion, violence, or disorder:
2.
of, relating to, or characteristic of a state or time of peace.
3.
peaceable; not argumentative, quarrelsome, or hostile:
YOU. Are. Welcome.
I accept your full retraction, and admission you were wrong.
- - - Updated - - -
Wrong.
/10char
- - - Updated - - -
You said:
"Because part of the definition of peaceful is law abiding and if wearing the mask as against the law they are not peaceful "
Please, back it up. I have provided multiple sources that say you are full of shit.
Pfft who cares. Born king or elected and screened rich kid what's the difference really?
OoooOooOoo I get the choice between 1 of 2 ass holes instead of just the one but these 2 also haven't been raised to rule correctly and have some radical ideas there gonna push as fast as they can in 4 years no matter how shit they end up in practise.
Democracy is a lie and we know it.
- - - Updated - - -
Actually you've only put up one source for one claim... And it proved you wrong remember.
Also you Do know saying Wrong does nothing?
People can look back over the thread and see for them selves chuck.
If you knew the candle was fire then the meal was cooked a long time ago.
Oh wow I read up haha you did it again.
Quarrelsome, disorder, agitation and commotion.
- - - Updated - - -
Yea i just spotted that in proving me wrong he proved me right. God I love @Machismo he's such a littel scamp
I checked out lots of definitions, and yet, I did not see "law-abiding" anywhere in there.
Does that mean I'm not peaceful when I drive one mile over the speed limit?
- - - Updated - - -
So, you made a baseless claim, and refuse to back it up? I'm noticing an ongoing trend. Let me know when you can back up all those claims.
"Because part of the definition of peaceful is law abiding and if wearing the mask as against the law they are not peaceful "
back it up.
It can express one's desire to wear a mask. That's it, that's all it should take. Why do goths wear black?
The existence of a law is never a justification for it.
- - - Updated - - -
Prove that I don't.
Also:
"Because part of the definition of peaceful is law abiding and if wearing the mask as against the law they are not peaceful "
Back it up.
I did we have already established with evidence you have a mask fetish.
And we established you don't know what the freedom of expression is
And we established you don't hold all freedom equally
We established you don't have clue about the UK government
And now we know thanks to your evidence you don't know what peace is.
Doing well chuck.
And it's all up in this thread for people to browse at the pleasure.