Since we can't call out Trolls and Bad Faith posters and the Ignore function doesn't actually ignore it. Add
"mmo-champion.com##li.postbitignored"
to your ublock or adblock filter to actually ignore ignored posters. Now just need a way to ignore responses to them as well.
This is not a one-sided matter, like for example stemcell reasearch is. Unproven drugs might as well give the patients 2 days to live instead of the six months previously estimated, then again, I guess it should be their own choice, just like the right to "pull the plug" if their existence is hopeless pain and misery. This is the first positive thing to come out of the current administration, that I can remember.
Mother pus bucket!
Unfortunately the results of any drug tests on terminally ill patients taking experimental drugs won't be useable to any large degree. Terminally ill patients usually have multiple things failing and are most likely already or recently on a laundry list of other medications and chemo treatments. Trying to find if a drug is effective or whether it kills the patient would be hard to determine in these cases.
Not saying the terminally ill shouldn't try, just don't expect the drug to get approval just from their applications on the terminally ill and dying. It's one of the reason drug companies haven't pushed for this in the past.
More half-assed legislation really just allows big pharma to use human test subjects.
If it was really about the who was about to patient, like others have said, they'd legalize medicinal marijuana and options to terminate on your own terms. Current options are what, pumping the patient full of narcotics anyway. At least let them take something thats not going to make them feel even worse, so then they have to take a bunch of other shit to off-set the opiate.
Resident Cosplay Progressive
This is something were he should have put regulations in place to protect people because you will have pharmaceutical companies take advantage of people so they can get data. An experimental drug yes but at what stage? what are the standards to allow humans to test it? we are talking about desperate people here there's just too much room for abuse. But I am sure you don't care, this is a more gray situation than black and white.
I will happily shit all over Trump 365 out of 365 days, but I don't actually have a problem with this. Yes, I acknowledge that statistically this is unlikely to help anyone, but it gives them hope and sometimes that's enough. Hopefully some of the people desperate enough to participate can also leverage their guinea-pig status into obtaining some palliative care funding from the pharmaceuticals in order to defray leftover costs for their families in addition to the drugs they're sampling.
So this is bad how? If you're a terminal patient you're doomed anyway, if the unproven drug kills you, so be it. If not you survive. Sounds like a rational choice.
In other words, pulling from the actual bill, it is required that they complete the phase 1 clinical trials (ie drug safety trials where general populace take it and observe side effects). This is several steps beyond animal trials in the chain.(c) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Biological product.--The term ``biological product''
has the meaning given to such term in section 351 of the Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262).
(2) Device; drug.--The terms ``device'' and ``drug'' have
the meanings given to such terms in section 201 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).
(3) Experimental drug, biological product, or device.--The
term ``experimental drug, biological product, or device''
that--
(A) has successfully completed a phase 1 clinical
investigation;
So, since people don't like reading the article and love to just hate on pharma, the pathway to gain access to unapproved treatments for critically ill patients existed before under the FDA's compassionate use program:
https://www.fda.gov/ForPatients/Othe...cm20041768.htm
This removes the need to get FDA approval. There are pros and cons to that but this is not really a game changer for most people.
To repeat in special bold font for the tl;dr crowd the ability to get unapproved treatment existed before this.
broken clock is right twice a day, wonder what messes will occur for the next twelve hours
Yep. This isn't a totally bad thing.
The only part that concerns me is this bit:
If used correctly, this could simply eliminate a bureaucratic hurdle. But given that most things aren't done correctly in CAPITALISM, this will also inevitably mean that a lot of absolute junk will be marketed to the terminally ill by preying on their weaknesses. It'll really be up to regulators to make sure it doesn't get abused.The measure gives people diagnosed with life-threatening conditions who have exhausted treatment options access to unproven drugs without needing permission from the Food and Drug Administration.
I was wondering why this sounded too good to be true.
This was penned and passed by congress, and then passed the Senate, and Trump then got to put his signature on it. Trump taking credit for someone else's work though, what else is new. Must be a day ending in Y.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"