ok gnoring the obvious racism of the post, you do realize, im just assuming based on the racism, and im 99% sure right you support donald trump, you do realize donald trump made it illegal for none profits to talk about abortion, contraception or sex education in africa and india, also he wants to illegalize abortion which would actually increase the african american population by about 5 million a year, so......... I guess ur really owning the libs here.. lol
Farmers are a greater threat to the biosphere than most would like to admit. 70% of the land deforested in the Amazon is used to raise cattle and most of the species that have been extirpated from great portions of the Great Plains like bison, pronghorn, horses, cougars, brown bears and gray wolves were removed or pushed off by cattle ranchers. Outside of poaching, a great deal of threat to elephants comes from farmers who shoot at bull elephants who will eat their maize crops (although there are non-lethal ways to drive them off like those makeshift chili pepper-condom bombs).
yes because economic development has been linked to lower birthrates, but this guy is a stefan molyneux viewer who probably beliefs this debunked race IQ theory, which is also weird since according to his own racist theory asians have higher IQ than whites, which makes me thinks hes not even trying to rationalize it, he straight up hates brown people.
Last edited by arandomuser; 2018-09-18 at 04:03 AM.
I vote that the property culling start with every global alarmist. Lets see them put their livelihood where their mouth is..
My bet is that civilization will keep expanding into the far future until the natural ecosystem is a quaint idea that people will view through documentaries.
You say that, but he pretty accurately pinpointed the regions which houses the most peopel and produce the most people, is already where the largest populations are.
I'm not saying that his opinion isn't grounded in what you say it is, but that doesn't make it any less true.
Well they mention oceans, and water covers over 70% of the earth's surface so it might not be terribly onerous. Plus the oceans are looking kind of sickly lately. Not to say they won't sustain some new form of life, just that the change may not be beneficial to humans. They might have a point.
And you think that's ever stopped countries like the US, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Russian, and China to name a few?...
Hell, the US and Saudi Arabia are in Yemen genocide civilians as I type this... You think these people give a fuck about "right" and "wrong"? Those concepts are entirely subjective.
If they ever have the ability to enforce a quarantine on 50% of the planet, they're not going to just stop at that...
- - - Updated - - -
Hah, wouldn't that be something!? But, they'll NEVER do that. There's a reason these politicians and celebrities advocating for "Climate Action" aren't practicing what that preach, and giving up their multiple mansions, dozens of cars, and private jets. They only want action to be taken against the "little people", while they get to continue living large and uneffected.
Last edited by Synros; 2018-09-18 at 07:17 AM.
ON WEDNESDAYS WE WEAR PINK
Long before any of that we will be mostly wiped out by some plague im sure.
Culling indeed
Can we also call for 50% of the planet to be Sterilised? Some places just have people that breed due to stupidity and not knowing any better about over population.
Actually. lets make that 75%.
- - - Updated - - -
Can't overtake another Countries majority population if you can only have 1 child
3.55B people would be half the population even that is still too many people.
- - - Updated - - -
I think that anyone with an IQ under 130 should have to take a multi-page test that tests their intelligence and home care and parenting skills.
"You know you that bitch when you cause all this conversation."