Well then get your shit together.
Get it all together. And put it in a backpack. All your shit. So it’s together. And if you gotta take it somewhere, take it somewhere, you know, take it to the shit store and sell it, or put it in a shit museum, I don’t care what you do, you just gotta get it together.
Get your shit together
umm no even in the paper work at the time the Militia was every able body person and you still didn't answer my question who trains equips and holds the guns for the "militia if it's not meaning for people just to have their own? and again properly function for them was for all free man to be armed and ready to come to the defence of the state (or against the state to keep it free)
Well then get your shit together.
Get it all together. And put it in a backpack. All your shit. So it’s together. And if you gotta take it somewhere, take it somewhere, you know, take it to the shit store and sell it, or put it in a shit museum, I don’t care what you do, you just gotta get it together.
Get your shit together
Just as an aside, the FN 5.7...kinda sweet...and expensive:
Try again:
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/a...health/553430/
"The modern origins of the impasse can be traced to 1996, when Congress passed an amendment to a spending bill that forbade the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from using money to “advocate or promote gun control.”"
There is a difference between researching gun violence and taking a political stance of advocating gun control. The amendment is just another misrepresentation of the NRA and it's initiatives.
Also, such legal/criminal matters are more appropriate for things like the NIJ, but meh, better to pay some docs to be political?
"I only feel two things Gary, nothing, and nothingness."
If it is legal in some states, which it is, then hard to blame someone for exercising a right they have. I myself, am not going to carry a firearm out in the public. I do not want anyone to know I am carrying. But I am not going to condemn those who do. And the NRA is a strong advocate for the Second Amendment, this is evident by the liberals hatred of them. You are entitled to your opinion of them however, but 5+ million members happen to disagree.
- - - Updated - - -
They did in 2013 as directed by President Obama. Look it up. They concluded that firearms are a important self defense tool. http://www.gunsandammo.com/politics/...ires-on-obama/
" If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.." - Abraham Lincoln
“ The Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to - prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..” - Samuel Adams
I'm not sure if there are any smaller crimes with them, but the only large mass shooting with a bump stock was the Vegas shooting. Certainly a terrible tragedy, but easily achieved with nearly any firearm. Literally like shooting fish in a barrel.
For myself, I think it's more of a rural/ urban thing, but I wouldn't carry openly anyway. Most of the open carry guys are doing it to prove a point and confront the stigma directly, a "protest" of sorts.I know about guns as much as I do fixing cars, no doubt about it. Look, I understand that people want to feel safe. I get that. But doing stupid shit like the gun owners "expressing their right to free carry" and then end up coming in fully loaded to a police station or carrying 5+ guns and an AR-15 in public is just absurd.
Because it's not a simple matter of "every gun imaginable", you can't just ban the bad guns. Australia/ UK banned all semi-automatics, but during that time the USA actually decreased crime by a larger percentage. The image that an ar15 is more lethal than a mini14, or that a handgun can't achieve similar numbers or a shotgun, or...Having events like Sandy Hook shooting or the events in Las Vegas shouldn't happen, and people shouldn't argue that being able to have every gun imaginable is more important than protecting the lives of children.
So now you're not just restricting specifics, you're restricting everything, because no one really "needs" any of it. And when you do away with millions of rifles to reduce the annual deaths from 300 to 100, you'll not worry about rights you don't care about.
That's a misrepresentation of the Social Security debate about due process. The biggest obstacle to mental illness vs background checks is HIPAA.People arguing that even though someone has mental illnesses or mentally unstable people should still be allowed to have guns? Why? How?
Guns are allowed in the venue, except for specific areas that are controlled by secret service when the president or vice president gives a speech.The NRA is a joke of an association and is nothing more than a terrorist group at this point. (The kicker about that group? Anytime they have a get-together, it's conveniently NO GUNS ALLOWED in the venue)
"I only feel two things Gary, nothing, and nothingness."
https://www.nap.edu/read/18319/chapter/3#15
"Many of these factors are confounding, and careful analysis is required to understand the independent and interactive effects, supporting the need for rigorous research."
Nice research overview. Not actual research.
Furthermore, I thought the US was a developed nation. Even the low estimate of required self-defense is appalling.
https://www.investors.com/politics/e...dia-narrative/
maybe you should try again
Well then get your shit together.
Get it all together. And put it in a backpack. All your shit. So it’s together. And if you gotta take it somewhere, take it somewhere, you know, take it to the shit store and sell it, or put it in a shit museum, I don’t care what you do, you just gotta get it together.
Get your shit together
The conclusion of the study is what you failed to see, or is that on purpose?
And now your real motive becomes clear. Since you are not a US citizen, your opinion on this matter weighs a lot less, considering you have no input into our system of laws. Being the most powerful nation on earth in both terms of economics and military, the world knows who is the leader.
Having a low estimate for self defense (in terms of the need for?) sounds like a good thing. How would that be appalling? The odds are extremely low in the whole range of causes of dying to have a need to use self defense. The important thing is, we have the right to choose how within the law.
- - - Updated - - -
There are ways they can make that harder without resorting to restricting the Constitutional rights of the citizens. A lack of proper security was the reason he was able to pull that off. Same with the school shootings. But to be clear, I am not against stricter restrictions on bump stocks or such type devices.
- - - Updated - - -
Do you wear your seat belt when driving? Or have smoke alarms in your apartment or house? If so, is that paranoia of something bad happening?
" If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.." - Abraham Lincoln
“ The Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to - prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..” - Samuel Adams
Couple more former "good guys with guns". $25k bail when arrested and charged with murder, insanity.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/crime...az_most&wpmk=1
" If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.." - Abraham Lincoln
“ The Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to - prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..” - Samuel Adams
The conclusion of the research is more research is required.
My opinion of US social is problems is that you're a major trading partner and I'd rather not have you guys killing each other. And quite frankly, widespread gun use in the US partially stems from white people wanting to keep themselves safe from black people.
Its appalling because self defense incidents occurring as often as it does implies widespread crime is happening. Just because it was stopped doesn't mean there wasn't an attempt.
Ought to throw that contraption in the trash.
Look, I'm not for banning them or anything - but they're just the dumbest damned things.
Only things they're good for is putting excessive wear on your rifle and wasting ammo.
If you claim to support the second amendment, and have to qualify it with preconditions, you don't support the second amendment.