Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
I would personally like to keep what freedoms I have. China is notorious for human rights violations on numerous occasions. I will agree that no one has a one size fits all system. I personally would ascribe more socialist ideologies with a capitalist way of life, and therefore keep my freedom. Maybe one day we will get the proper balance of caring for our population vs what it would actually cost.
The capitalist system has exacerbated the problem of income inequality in America to the point where people are genuinely getting pissed off about it in general conversation. I pretty much get tired of having a single person have more wealth than they could feasibly spend in a single lifetime complain about how much tax they pay.
On the topic of the scientist, from what I have read he pretty much knew he was going to fast with the research. The problem was he just didn't care about what happened to the children the popped out. He just wanted his name in the history books as the first person to use this technology to shape a human genome. Hubris was a heavy influence on this guy. While I don't think he should be put to death I do think they should set certain rules on what CRISPR can be used for. When you start messing around with genomes you are affected the evolution of an entire family, not just the baby that is born with edited genes. This can have unintended consequences that we just don't fully understand. We certainly need to look into it more before it gets out of hand.
Hope he gets released or broken out, this great man shouldn't be put to death for doing something needed.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
Damn, we got ourselves a real-life Professor Hojo.
But in all seriousness, it would be excessive for him to get the death penalty. Some good years in prison and stripping of his position with denial of any state funding for future projects would be enough. Probably.
Also hope the babies grow up to be healthy and fine. And, y'know, hopefully not die within a few years or something.
If the technology could produce significantly better people, as far as factors like IQ and longevity/disease resistance goes, don't you think the elites of most societies will want to keep that technology for themselves? If you suddenly have a whole generation of super people running around, it would threaten the power structure in any society where this happened.
Most people would rather die than think, and most people do. -Bertrand Russell
Before the camps, I regarded the existence of nationality as something that shouldn’t be noticed - nationality did not really exist, only humanity. But in the camps one learns: if you belong to a successful nation you are protected and you survive. If you are part of universal humanity - too bad for you -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
He's probably already dead.
A soldier will fight long and hard for a bit of colored ribbon.
No matter how you look at that guy on moral stand point, but without people like him science would not have evolved so drastically over the past 30 years. But communist countries are famous to repress or execute scientists, so no wonder he might be executed.
There is so many things done in today's hospital on a daily basis that if you went back in time to learn "how" they came up with that solution you'd tell youself it's impossible, they shouldnt have allowed that and other stuff like that.
Alot of important discovery are made in back alleys, in shady places, outside the normal channels or in place you dont even want to know what is going on in there and then, 20-30 years later we're thanking the guy that took the chance of doing it.
They might kill that chinese scientist, but he'll be for ever knew at that first person to have done it and maybe it will be thanks to him that in XX years we'll be able to remove bad genes and save even more people.