Originally Posted by
therealstegblob
I've spoken in defense of Cataclysm before, as I think the social stigma towards it is both undeserved and largely manufactured by people just parroting 'the popular opinion' at the time. It is my belief that Cataclysm was scorned because of two primary reasons: First of all, the expansion got off to a rocky start with players when Blizzard massively spiked heroic dungeon difficulty. This was something that hyped people the fuck up for the expansion, but once it dropped, the silent majority went apeshit. Subs dropped and, due to the advent of RIFT and SWOTR, the two latest "WoW Killers, For Sure(TM)", popular opinion started to be that WoW was literally dying, and obviously Cataclysm (the recent expansion) was to blame for it.
Things blew over a bit and I remember people starting to say "hey this expansion isn't so bad" with the release of Firelands. A brief period of people again decrying the game as dying when Abyssal Maw was announced as scrapped, but then all was quiet until Dragon Soul. People bitched relentlessly (not that they were entirely wrong to do so) about the recycling of models and raid environments, and it seemed like Cataclysm both started and ended in a swell of negative pushback, again only compounded by the fact that the entire expansion was accented by lots of players talking about how 'totally dead' it was because RIFT and SWOTR killed it.
Personally, it's my favorite expansion. I really loved that they continued with the WotLK-style of Rep grind, as it didn't time gate rep gain and let you get it at your leisure. Same with dungeons. Instead of logging in once a day to get your daily dungeon badge, you instead were able to do 7 dungeon runs each week. Again, not just taking away some of the time gating but also letting you play the game at your leisure. These two things alone were fucking great for me, but the raids were all really, really well done. Dragon Soul might have had some unimpressive bosses, and even if both Deathwing fights were visually spectacular, they got very fucking repetitive to do week after week (which I think was the real nail in the coffin for Dragon Soul's reputation).
All in all, Cataclysm was a really great expansion. It gave us a revamped old world, decent leveling experience (I feel I should mention that negative criticism towards Vashj'ir also contributed to a lot of Cataclysm's early tarnished image) and very memorable raids. The first tier of Cataclysm raids was three raids, for a total of 13 bosses, AND they originally planned for Firelands to be part of the launch tier, too. Cataclysm was certainly one of, if not the most, ambitious of the expansions. It was everything good about WotLK and TBC gameplay theories, only perfected a bit more.
All in all, I completely refute and do not understand anyone who actually, unironically, tries to call Cataclysm one of the worst expansions. Rather I think most people just mindlessly parrot opinions everyone else was parroting at the time and I almost never see anyone actually explain their stance on Cataclysm, they just say CATA SUCKS I HATED IT MORE THAN WOD EVEN LOL and expect people to just nod along with them. I feel, even, that most people who just parrot how bad they thought the expansion was probably weren't even playing when it was current content.
So, I ask you: Explain why you didn't like Cataclysm. I'm not saying people aren't allowed to not like it (WoW is inherently a shit game, after all) and I understand why people might criticize it, but I do wonder why people so easily, and with seemingly so little consideration, claim it's one of the worst expansions in comparison to the others.